Saul Aaron Kripke is an American philosopher and logician now emeritus from Princeton and professor of philosophy at CUNY Graduate Center. He has been immensely influential in a number of fields related to logic and philosophy of language. Much of his work remains unpublished or exists only as tape-recordings and privately circulated manuscripts. He is nonetheless widely regarded as the foremost philosopher of the turn of the millenium, and was the winner of the 2001 Schock Prize in Logic and Philosophy.
发表于2024-12-18
Naming and Necessity 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书
很难想象,这个年代的 actualist,能把概念和数学逻辑的关系问题搞成这个模样。 四种数学逻辑理论,指着一个模态理论做。就如同一辆四驱车,只剩下一个轱辘。 这,还不原地画圈儿??(← 看在傅里叶级数的份儿上,我厚道点儿) 哲学立场,评论标题我已经点明了。详细说说本书...
评分在集中读德法系的时候穿插读一下英美系的东西,免得想法偏执了。 中译本序 p5 克里普克提出他的历史的,因果的命名理论。按照这种理论,专名是借助于某些与这个名称有关的历史事实去指称某个特定的对象的。 p11 先验命题和必然命题 (如果否认后验的必然命题,就会使得命题独...
评分在大学里,颇有一部分力薄儒的主业是掩饰自己的愚蠢。我相信这本书就是那群人捧起来的。 跟克里普克是智力低下的表现。 克里普克只是在分析哲学内部,披着分析哲学的外衣,重复近代欧陆哲学的谬误而已。 “所有可能的世界” 这是一个令我当场火冒三丈,至今含恨2年的词组。...
评分在大学里,颇有一部分力薄儒的主业是掩饰自己的愚蠢。我相信这本书就是那群人捧起来的。 跟克里普克是智力低下的表现。 克里普克只是在分析哲学内部,披着分析哲学的外衣,重复近代欧陆哲学的谬误而已。 “所有可能的世界” 这是一个令我当场火冒三丈,至今含恨2年的词组。...
评分罗素的摹状词理论是分析哲学中少数几个最重要的理论之一。 罗素认为,名词的指称实际上可以化归为一系列的摹状谓词(descriptive predicate)。意思就是说,当我们用某词A指称某单个物或某类物时,该词A实际上是一个或多个属性的缩写。比如,单称名词“吴承恩”实际上...
图书标签: 哲学 语言哲学 分析哲学 Kripke 克里普克 形而上学 Philosophy 语言
If there is such a thing as essential reading in metaphysics or in philosophy of language, this is it.
Ever since the publication of its original version, Naming and Necessity has had great and increasing influence. It redirected philosophical attention to neglected questions of natural and metaphysical necessity and to the connections between these and theories of reference, in particular of naming, and of identity. From a critique of the dominant tendency to assimilate names to descriptions and more generally to treat their reference as a function of their Fregean sense, surprisingly deep and widespread consequences may be drawn. The largely discredited distinction between accidental and essential properties, both of individual things (including people) and of kinds of things, is revived. So is a consequent view of science as what seeks out the essences of natural kinds. Traditional objections to such views are dealt with by sharpening distinctions between epistemic and metaphysical necessity; in particular by the startling admission of necessary a posteriori truths. From these, in particular from identity statements using rigid designators whether of things or of kinds, further remarkable consequences are drawn for the natures of things, of people, and of kinds; strong objections follow, for example to identity versions of materialism as a theory of the mind.
This seminal work, to which today's thriving essentialist metaphysics largely owes its impetus, is here published with a substantial new Preface by the author.
I should be more proud than otherwise if my opposition to it led to my being taken for an old-fashioned empiricist. (A. J. Ayer 1984)
评分这本书有时间一定要好好读。
评分9月去北大搞本Kripke签名本回来。
评分即使跟有些prof讨论,发现他们有人和Kripke的直觉真的也能够做到完全相反(虽然我的intuition完全认同kripke。很refreshing,但intuition的运用真的是建立在nothing better的基础上么?或者说intuition在哲学argument中占据如此主要的立场是否legitimate
评分I should be more proud than otherwise if my opposition to it led to my being taken for an old-fashioned empiricist. (A. J. Ayer 1984)
Naming and Necessity 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书