加利福尼亞大學伯剋利分校哲學教授
When it was first published in 1972, Hubert Dreyfus's manifesto on the inherent inability of disembodied machines to mimic higher mental functions caused an uproar in the artificial intelligence community. The world has changed since then. Today it is clear that "good old-fashioned AI," based on the idea of using symbolic representations to produce general intelligence, is in decline (although several believers still pursue its pot of gold), and the focus of the Al community has shifted to more complex models of the mind. It has also become more common for AI researchers to seek out and study philosophy. For this edition of his now classic book, Dreyfus has added a lengthy new introduction outlining these changes and assessing the paradigms of connectionism and neural networks that have transformed the field.At a time when researchers were proposing grand plans for general problem solvers and automatic translation machines, Dreyfus predicted that they would fail because their conception of mental functioning was naive, and he suggested that they would do well to acquaint themselves with modern philosophical approaches to human beings. What Computers Can't Do was widely attacked but quietly studied. Dreyfus's arguments are still provocative and focus our attention once again on what it is that makes human beings unique.Hubert L. Dreyfus, who is Professor of Philosophy at the University of California, Berkeley, is also the author of Being-in-the-World. A Commentary on Heidegger's Being and Time, Division I.
發表於2024-12-22
What Computers Still Can't Do 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
德雷福斯是大陸傳統的現象這一哲學傢,他在蘭德公司做瞭一個研究報告,把60年代的人工智能比喻成煉金術,這本書就是來自於這個報告。 書中對人工智能的尖銳質疑,有些看來由於人工智能學科的發展,已經需要重新審視,有些已經證明瞭哲學傢的正確性,還有一些,主要是牽涉到現象...
評分德雷福斯是大陸傳統的現象這一哲學傢,他在蘭德公司做瞭一個研究報告,把60年代的人工智能比喻成煉金術,這本書就是來自於這個報告。 書中對人工智能的尖銳質疑,有些看來由於人工智能學科的發展,已經需要重新審視,有些已經證明瞭哲學傢的正確性,還有一些,主要是牽涉到現象...
評分德雷福斯是大陸傳統的現象這一哲學傢,他在蘭德公司做瞭一個研究報告,把60年代的人工智能比喻成煉金術,這本書就是來自於這個報告。 書中對人工智能的尖銳質疑,有些看來由於人工智能學科的發展,已經需要重新審視,有些已經證明瞭哲學傢的正確性,還有一些,主要是牽涉到現象...
評分德雷福斯是大陸傳統的現象這一哲學傢,他在蘭德公司做瞭一個研究報告,把60年代的人工智能比喻成煉金術,這本書就是來自於這個報告。 書中對人工智能的尖銳質疑,有些看來由於人工智能學科的發展,已經需要重新審視,有些已經證明瞭哲學傢的正確性,還有一些,主要是牽涉到現象...
評分德雷福斯是大陸傳統的現象這一哲學傢,他在蘭德公司做瞭一個研究報告,把60年代的人工智能比喻成煉金術,這本書就是來自於這個報告。 書中對人工智能的尖銳質疑,有些看來由於人工智能學科的發展,已經需要重新審視,有些已經證明瞭哲學傢的正確性,還有一些,主要是牽涉到現象...
圖書標籤: AI 計算機 人工智能 哲學 計算機科學 科學哲學 計算科學 認知科學
一篇introduction已經把我嚇尿瞭
評分德雷福斯在MIT寫這本書也不容易,忍瞭多少同事的白眼。再版不僅不改口,繼續批評人工智能領域的盲目樂觀,還故意加瞭 “仍然”倆字。第一部分概述人工智能的發展曆史,從機器翻譯到語義識彆的方法轉變,第二部分從神經學、心理學、認識論和本體論四個方麵質疑瞭實現人工智能的假設。
評分其中一個很妙的比喻:計算機智能取得的初步成功和之後遇到的巨大瓶頸的模式不斷重復,如果這點成功也算進展的話,就好比一個人爬到樹上也算登月的一大進展瞭。
評分其中一個很妙的比喻:計算機智能取得的初步成功和之後遇到的巨大瓶頸的模式不斷重復,如果這點成功也算進展的話,就好比一個人爬到樹上也算登月的一大進展瞭。
評分其中一個很妙的比喻:計算機智能取得的初步成功和之後遇到的巨大瓶頸的模式不斷重復,如果這點成功也算進展的話,就好比一個人爬到樹上也算登月的一大進展瞭。
What Computers Still Can't Do 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載