甘丹·梅亞蘇(Quentin Meillassoux,1967—),法國人,1988年考入巴黎高等師範學院,是備受矚目的當代哲學的希望之星。2006年以來,他先後齣版瞭《有限性之後:論偶然性的必然性》、《數字與塞壬》、《形而上學和科學外世界的虛構》、《沒有將來的時間》和《迭代、反復、重復:無用的符號的思辨分析》等著述,廣受好評,也頗受爭議。
This book is now available for the first time in paperback, the remarkable debut of a former student of Alain Badiou. Quentin Meillassoux, a former student of Alain Badiou, is considered to be one of the most talented and exciting new voices in contemporary French philosophy. Quentin Meillassoux's remarkable debut makes a strikingly original contribution to contemporary French philosophy and is set to have a significant impact on the future of Continental philosophy. Written in a style that marries great clarity of expression with argumentative rigour, "After Finitude" provides bold readings of the history of philosophy and sets out a devastating critique of the unavowed fideism at the heart of post-Kantian philosophy. Meillassoux introduces a startlingly novel philosophical alternative to the forced choice between dogmatism and critique. "After Finitude" proposes a new alliance between philosophy and science and calls for an unequivocal halt to the creeping return of religiosity in contemporary philosophical discourse. The exceptional lucidity and the centrality of argument in Meillassoux's writing should appeal to Analytic as well as Continental philosophers, while his critique of fideism will be of interest to anyone preoccupied by the relation between philosophy, theology and religion.
發表於2024-11-21
After Finitude 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
讀完梅亞蘇的《有限性之後:論偶然性的必然性》,吊詭式的論證並不能讓人完全信服其論證過程,特彆是引入數學的集閤論來論證,感覺故弄玄虛,數學大廈因為哥德爾不完全定理而存在裂縫,如何能用數學來論證哲學?但莫諾的生物學實踐卻從另一方麵論證瞭偶然性的必然性,在大時間...
評分讀完梅亞蘇的《有限性之後:論偶然性的必然性》,吊詭式的論證並不能讓人完全信服其論證過程,特彆是引入數學的集閤論來論證,感覺故弄玄虛,數學大廈因為哥德爾不完全定理而存在裂縫,如何能用數學來論證哲學?但莫諾的生物學實踐卻從另一方麵論證瞭偶然性的必然性,在大時間...
評分讀完梅亞蘇的《有限性之後:論偶然性的必然性》,吊詭式的論證並不能讓人完全信服其論證過程,特彆是引入數學的集閤論來論證,感覺故弄玄虛,數學大廈因為哥德爾不完全定理而存在裂縫,如何能用數學來論證哲學?但莫諾的生物學實踐卻從另一方麵論證瞭偶然性的必然性,在大時間...
評分讀完梅亞蘇的《有限性之後:論偶然性的必然性》,吊詭式的論證並不能讓人完全信服其論證過程,特彆是引入數學的集閤論來論證,感覺故弄玄虛,數學大廈因為哥德爾不完全定理而存在裂縫,如何能用數學來論證哲學?但莫諾的生物學實踐卻從另一方麵論證瞭偶然性的必然性,在大時間...
評分讀完梅亞蘇的《有限性之後:論偶然性的必然性》,吊詭式的論證並不能讓人完全信服其論證過程,特彆是引入數學的集閤論來論證,感覺故弄玄虛,數學大廈因為哥德爾不完全定理而存在裂縫,如何能用數學來論證哲學?但莫諾的生物學實踐卻從另一方麵論證瞭偶然性的必然性,在大時間...
圖書標籤: 法國哲學 Meillassoux 哲學 Quentin_Meillassoux 法國 梅亞蘇 QuentinMeillassoux 思辨實在論
又是少於10人評價TT 還是很有趣的 有時間把論文貼上來
評分speculative: conceivable existence independent of human thought. Neither a necessary existence, nor a metaphysical positing: a necessary contingent.
評分翻譯得是挺準確,但是濃烈的翻譯腔讓人倒胃口
評分非常有趣的討論,在我看來是展現齣瞭笛卡爾-康德一脈的根本睏境,但是後麵構建性部分裏幾乎每個核心論證都有問題。不過我本來就更關心前半部分的澄清工作,這部分讀下來確實收獲不小。
評分speculative: conceivable existence independent of human thought. Neither a necessary existence, nor a metaphysical positing: a necessary contingent.
After Finitude 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載