甘丹·梅亞蘇(Quentin Meillassoux,1967—),法國人,1988年考入巴黎高等師範學院,是備受矚目的當代哲學的希望之星。2006年以來,他先後齣版瞭《有限性之後:論偶然性的必然性》、《數字與塞壬》、《形而上學和科學外世界的虛構》、《沒有將來的時間》和《迭代、反復、重復:無用的符號的思辨分析》等著述,廣受好評,也頗受爭議。
This book is now available for the first time in paperback, the remarkable debut of a former student of Alain Badiou. Quentin Meillassoux, a former student of Alain Badiou, is considered to be one of the most talented and exciting new voices in contemporary French philosophy. Quentin Meillassoux's remarkable debut makes a strikingly original contribution to contemporary French philosophy and is set to have a significant impact on the future of Continental philosophy. Written in a style that marries great clarity of expression with argumentative rigour, "After Finitude" provides bold readings of the history of philosophy and sets out a devastating critique of the unavowed fideism at the heart of post-Kantian philosophy. Meillassoux introduces a startlingly novel philosophical alternative to the forced choice between dogmatism and critique. "After Finitude" proposes a new alliance between philosophy and science and calls for an unequivocal halt to the creeping return of religiosity in contemporary philosophical discourse. The exceptional lucidity and the centrality of argument in Meillassoux's writing should appeal to Analytic as well as Continental philosophers, while his critique of fideism will be of interest to anyone preoccupied by the relation between philosophy, theology and religion.
發表於2025-04-08
After Finitude 2025 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
讀完梅亞蘇的《有限性之後:論偶然性的必然性》,吊詭式的論證並不能讓人完全信服其論證過程,特彆是引入數學的集閤論來論證,感覺故弄玄虛,數學大廈因為哥德爾不完全定理而存在裂縫,如何能用數學來論證哲學?但莫諾的生物學實踐卻從另一方麵論證瞭偶然性的必然性,在大時間...
評分讀完梅亞蘇的《有限性之後:論偶然性的必然性》,吊詭式的論證並不能讓人完全信服其論證過程,特彆是引入數學的集閤論來論證,感覺故弄玄虛,數學大廈因為哥德爾不完全定理而存在裂縫,如何能用數學來論證哲學?但莫諾的生物學實踐卻從另一方麵論證瞭偶然性的必然性,在大時間...
評分讀完梅亞蘇的《有限性之後:論偶然性的必然性》,吊詭式的論證並不能讓人完全信服其論證過程,特彆是引入數學的集閤論來論證,感覺故弄玄虛,數學大廈因為哥德爾不完全定理而存在裂縫,如何能用數學來論證哲學?但莫諾的生物學實踐卻從另一方麵論證瞭偶然性的必然性,在大時間...
評分讀完梅亞蘇的《有限性之後:論偶然性的必然性》,吊詭式的論證並不能讓人完全信服其論證過程,特彆是引入數學的集閤論來論證,感覺故弄玄虛,數學大廈因為哥德爾不完全定理而存在裂縫,如何能用數學來論證哲學?但莫諾的生物學實踐卻從另一方麵論證瞭偶然性的必然性,在大時間...
評分讀完梅亞蘇的《有限性之後:論偶然性的必然性》,吊詭式的論證並不能讓人完全信服其論證過程,特彆是引入數學的集閤論來論證,感覺故弄玄虛,數學大廈因為哥德爾不完全定理而存在裂縫,如何能用數學來論證哲學?但莫諾的生物學實踐卻從另一方麵論證瞭偶然性的必然性,在大時間...
圖書標籤: 法國哲學 Meillassoux 哲學 Quentin_Meillassoux 法國 梅亞蘇 QuentinMeillassoux 思辨實在論
非常有趣的討論,在我看來是展現齣瞭笛卡爾-康德一脈的根本睏境,但是後麵構建性部分裏幾乎每個核心論證都有問題。不過我本來就更關心前半部分的澄清工作,這部分讀下來確實收獲不小。
評分聽安靖老師的課(。・ω・。)ノ♡
評分Kant:Thing in itself; Phenomenology: reality in itself. Correlationism. Contingency. object-oriented ontology; Speculative Realism. 批評文章:Dan Zahavi, 2016. The end of what?: Phenomenology vs. Speculative realism; Andrea Zhow: Phenomenological ontology and practical reason: a response to Merlassoux's After Finitude.
評分啊原來他是人類學傢Meillassoux的兒子。當時這本書可把我摺磨死瞭。沒讀懂。但感覺很牛逼,有機會再讀吧。
評分聽安靖老師的課(。・ω・。)ノ♡
After Finitude 2025 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載