Adorno and Horkheimer see the self-destruction of Western reason as grounded in a historical and fateful dialectic between the domination of external nature and society. They trace enlightenment, which split these spheres apart, back to its mythical roots. Enlightenment and myth, therefore, are not irreconcilable opposites, but dialectically mediated qualities of both real and intellectual life. "Myth is already enlightenment, and enlightenment reverts to mythology." This paradox is the fundamental thesis of the book.
"Dialectic of Enlightenment" is undoubtedly the most influential publication of the Frankfurt School of Critical Theory. Written during the Second World War and circulated privately, it appeared in a printed edition in Amsterdam in 1947. "What we had set out to do," the authors write in the Preface, "was nothing less than to explain why humanity, instead of entering a truly human state, is sinking into a new kind of barbarism." Yet the work goes far beyond a mere critique of contemporary events. Historically remote developments, indeed, the birth of Western history and of subjectivity itself out of the struggle against natural forces, as represented in myths, are connected in a wide arch to the most threatening experiences of the present. The book consists in five chapters, at first glance unconnected, together with a number of shorter notes. The various analyses concern such phenomena as the detachment of science from practical life, formalized morality, the manipulative nature of entertainment culture, and a paranoid behavioral structure, expressed in aggressive anti-Semitism, that marks the limits of enlightenment. The authors perceive a common element in these phenomena, the tendency toward self-destruction of the guiding criteria inherent in enlightenment thought from the beginning. Using historical analyses to elucidate the present, they show, against the background of a prehistory of subjectivity, why the National Socialist terror was not an aberration of modern history but was rooted deeply in the fundamental characteristics of Western civilization. Adorno and Horkheimer see the self-destruction of Western reason as grounded in a historical and fateful dialectic between the domination of external nature and society. They trace enlightenment, which split these spheres apart, back to its mythical roots. Enlightenment and myth, therefore, are not irreconcilable opposites, but dialectically mediated qualities of both real and intellectual life. "Myth is already enlightenment, and enlightenment reverts to mythology." This paradox is the fundamental thesis of the book. This new translation, based on the text in the complete edition of the works of Max Horkheimer, contains textual variants, commentary upon them, and an editorial discussion of the position of this work in the development of Critical Theory.
發表於2024-11-24
Dialectic of Enlightenment 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
這是我十年前讀到的第一本西方馬剋思主義文化批判作品。後來齣瞭新版,阿多爾諾部分是曹衛東翻譯的,雖然沒讀過這個版本,但看到有人說與原文對照的話能看齣曹衛東翻譯得不好,我不懂德文,無從判斷。我看的這個版本(洪佩鬱, 藺月峰譯)也是從德文譯齣的,但多用短句翻譯(譯...
評分一 在過去的很長一段時間內,西方人都把自己的中世紀稱為黑暗時代,當然,現在我們已經知道,“黑暗”的中世紀並非黑暗。但試圖考量其之所以被稱為黑暗的標準,我們就不難發現:人們都是以近代以來的科學精神之標準來看待所謂的中世紀的“黑暗”;而問題則在於這樣的一種標準...
評分在我們生存的時代,大眾文化已經如微塵般每時每刻地漂浮在周遭的空氣裏。我們沉浸在大眾文化中,更多的時候已經對它熟視無睹。然而,就在一片昏昏然中,作為消費品的大眾文化竟反客為主,成為駕馭人類理性的工具。 多數大眾對此或許是不屑一顧的,但欺騙的神話正在真實地上演...
評分 評分仔細把三篇主要的文章和附錄一再讀瞭一遍。振聾發聵。敏銳到我有時候都懷疑是不是譯者自己把當代的問題寫進瞭書裏,而不是兩位作者在上個世紀初寫的。 阿多諾擔心的問題跟本雅明是一樣的,都是對主體客觀化深刻的恐懼。但在這本書裏,並沒有凸顯齣阿多諾為人...
圖書標籤: 哲學 法蘭剋福學派 Adorno Horkheimer Frankfurt 社會學 阿多諾 霍剋海默
沒懂
評分有1944年校勘,做得很好。
評分Adorno果然夠刁鑽夠刻薄,跑到美國把人傢文化批判得渣都不剩。他說馬剋吐溫那種蠢到無可救藥的作品,卻總被美國文化産業用來調戲大眾。讀得真高興,我最討厭的就是美國錶麵歡快實則空洞的糙文化。adorno,手動贊!
評分!!!
評分!!!
Dialectic of Enlightenment 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載