Adorno and Horkheimer see the self-destruction of Western reason as grounded in a historical and fateful dialectic between the domination of external nature and society. They trace enlightenment, which split these spheres apart, back to its mythical roots. Enlightenment and myth, therefore, are not irreconcilable opposites, but dialectically mediated qualities of both real and intellectual life. "Myth is already enlightenment, and enlightenment reverts to mythology." This paradox is the fundamental thesis of the book.
"Dialectic of Enlightenment" is undoubtedly the most influential publication of the Frankfurt School of Critical Theory. Written during the Second World War and circulated privately, it appeared in a printed edition in Amsterdam in 1947. "What we had set out to do," the authors write in the Preface, "was nothing less than to explain why humanity, instead of entering a truly human state, is sinking into a new kind of barbarism." Yet the work goes far beyond a mere critique of contemporary events. Historically remote developments, indeed, the birth of Western history and of subjectivity itself out of the struggle against natural forces, as represented in myths, are connected in a wide arch to the most threatening experiences of the present. The book consists in five chapters, at first glance unconnected, together with a number of shorter notes. The various analyses concern such phenomena as the detachment of science from practical life, formalized morality, the manipulative nature of entertainment culture, and a paranoid behavioral structure, expressed in aggressive anti-Semitism, that marks the limits of enlightenment. The authors perceive a common element in these phenomena, the tendency toward self-destruction of the guiding criteria inherent in enlightenment thought from the beginning. Using historical analyses to elucidate the present, they show, against the background of a prehistory of subjectivity, why the National Socialist terror was not an aberration of modern history but was rooted deeply in the fundamental characteristics of Western civilization. Adorno and Horkheimer see the self-destruction of Western reason as grounded in a historical and fateful dialectic between the domination of external nature and society. They trace enlightenment, which split these spheres apart, back to its mythical roots. Enlightenment and myth, therefore, are not irreconcilable opposites, but dialectically mediated qualities of both real and intellectual life. "Myth is already enlightenment, and enlightenment reverts to mythology." This paradox is the fundamental thesis of the book. This new translation, based on the text in the complete edition of the works of Max Horkheimer, contains textual variants, commentary upon them, and an editorial discussion of the position of this work in the development of Critical Theory.
發表於2025-03-25
Dialectic of Enlightenment 2025 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
這是我十年前讀到的第一本西方馬剋思主義文化批判作品。後來齣瞭新版,阿多爾諾部分是曹衛東翻譯的,雖然沒讀過這個版本,但看到有人說與原文對照的話能看齣曹衛東翻譯得不好,我不懂德文,無從判斷。我看的這個版本(洪佩鬱, 藺月峰譯)也是從德文譯齣的,但多用短句翻譯(譯...
評分在《資本論》中,馬剋思錶達瞭這樣一個論題:資本具有天然的逐利性,社會上哪個行業賺錢,資本就會像潮水般湧過去。社會中的資本具有一種特殊的能力:它所到之處就會使原來美好的事物遭到貶損,因為它抽離瞭傳統社會中各種內在價值,取而代之的交換價值。資本的不斷擴散,其實...
評分在《資本論》中,馬剋思錶達瞭這樣一個論題:資本具有天然的逐利性,社會上哪個行業賺錢,資本就會像潮水般湧過去。社會中的資本具有一種特殊的能力:它所到之處就會使原來美好的事物遭到貶損,因為它抽離瞭傳統社會中各種內在價值,取而代之的交換價值。資本的不斷擴散,其實...
評分在《資本論》中,馬剋思錶達瞭這樣一個論題:資本具有天然的逐利性,社會上哪個行業賺錢,資本就會像潮水般湧過去。社會中的資本具有一種特殊的能力:它所到之處就會使原來美好的事物遭到貶損,因為它抽離瞭傳統社會中各種內在價值,取而代之的交換價值。資本的不斷擴散,其實...
評分一稿多投233333 讀書報告:現代景觀社會的基本結構 一、故事的緣起 過去的兩百多年見證瞭人類社會翻天覆地的變化:比過去的幾韆年還要大。人口越來越多,知識越來越廣,機器越來越強大,信息交流越來越方便,戰爭越來越殘酷,休閑娛樂越來越豐富,未來的風險越來越大。這些變化...
圖書標籤: 哲學 法蘭剋福學派 Adorno Horkheimer Frankfurt 社會學 阿多諾 霍剋海默
OK,我用自己的話把第一章翻譯瞭一遍,但是仍然是感覺要梳理清楚批判理論的前因後果真是不容易啊!
評分睡前催眠讀物
評分忽然就覺得多少可以解釋為什麼天朝大眾如此熱愛看無腦綜藝和國産劇,大概是因為這些精心推敲過套路、拿捏著人的笑點及其頻率的節目真的可以讓被嚴重剝削的勞動人民在工作與工作的間隙裏迅速迴血且逐步放棄思考的自覺——一切的目的隻是為瞭成為更適應生産的螺絲釘。或許從來沒有哪個社會形態會如此無孔不入而悄無聲息地滲透統治階級的意識形態,成功化矛盾於無形。這大概也解釋瞭為什麼無産階級並沒有成為曆史的執行者,共産主義也終究無法到來。
評分其實這些觀點放在現在看來也就那樣,但是那時候的人在那個背景下能想到這麼些東西的……都是日後摺磨莘莘學子的大牛人!文化産業研究必讀。
評分So enough.
Dialectic of Enlightenment 2025 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載