This is the first time one of the most important of Lukacs' early theoretical writings, published in Germany in 1923, has been made available in English. The book consists of a series of essays treating, among other topics, the definition of orthodox Marxism, the question of legality and illegality, Rosa Luxemburg as a Marxist, the changing function of Historic Marxism, class consciousness, and the substantiation and consciousness of the Proletariat.Writing in 1968, on the occasion of the appearance of his collected works, Lukacs evaluated the influence of this book as follows:"For the historical effect of History and Class Consciousness and also for the actuality of the present time one problem is of decisive importance: alienation, which is here treated for the first time since Marx as the central question of a revolutionary critique of capitalism, and whose historical as well as methodological origins are deeply rooted in Hegelian dialectic. It goes without saying that the problem was omnipresent. A few years after History and Class Consciousness was published, it was moved into the focus of philosophical discussion by Heidegger in his Being and Time, a place which it maintains to this day largely as a result of the position occupied by Sartre and his followers. The philologic question raised by L. Goldmann, who considered Heidegger's work partly as a polemic reply to my (admittedly unnamed) work, need not be discussed here. It suffices today to say that the problem was in the air, particularly if we analyze its background in detail in order to clarify its effect, the mixture of Marxist and Existentialist thought processes, which prevailed especially in France immediately after the Second World War. In this connection priorities, influences, and so on are not particularly significant. What is important is that the alienation of man was recognized and appreciated as the central problem of the time in which we live, by bourgeois as well as proletarian, by politically rightist and leftist thinkers. Thus, History and Class Consciousness exerted a profound effect in the circles of the youthful intelligentsia."George Lichtheim, also in 1968, writes that "...The originality of the early Lukacs lay in the assertion that the totality of history could be apprehended by adopting a particular 'class standpoint': that of the proletariat. Class consciousness;not indeed the empirical consciousness of the actual proletariat, which was hopelessly entangled with the surface aspects of objective reality, but an ideal-typical consciousness proper to a class which radically negates the existing order of reality: that was the formula which had made it possible for the Lukacs of 1923 to unify theory and practice."
發表於2025-02-02
History and Class Consciousness 2025 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
此章此節盧卡奇首先陳述瞭“在資産階級社會,隻有資産階級和無産階級纔是純粹的階級”的觀點,然後便開始大加撻伐資産階級意識的虛假乃至於虛僞。 有趣的是,盧卡奇說“這種當時的意識企圖將‘計劃經濟’和資産階級的階級利益在經濟上協調起來,而正在上升的資本主義的...
評分 評分此章此節盧卡奇首先陳述瞭“在資産階級社會,隻有資産階級和無産階級纔是純粹的階級”的觀點,然後便開始大加撻伐資産階級意識的虛假乃至於虛僞。 有趣的是,盧卡奇說“這種當時的意識企圖將‘計劃經濟’和資産階級的階級利益在經濟上協調起來,而正在上升的資本主義的...
評分此書曾反復齣現在我的論文中,但我其實還有個彆篇章沒有讀完,準備寫係列的讀書筆記。以下是一小則: http://walterecho.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!C122B2B46F955957!322.entry
評分圖書標籤: 馬剋思主義 Lukacs Marxism 批判理論 盧卡奇 哲學 曆史 西馬
論煽顛的話,現在的公知和這位還有差距……
評分論異化是如何從物質層麵一步步入侵心靈
評分心力交瘁。。
評分末瞭還是隻硬著頭皮讀瞭物化那一章,有點明白瞭本雅明為何會為此激動。其實說到底,此時盧卡奇筆下的工人與無産階級,多像《小說理論》裏那個現代小說主人公啊:麵對一個生活與意義相割裂的世界,時間塌縮為空間,形式如此不堪重負——而這一切都有待一個現代小說”新人“,一個曆史的“英雄”,即獲得瞭階級意識的無産階級,在曆史的實踐中,將形式與內容重新閤為一體。那麼,《啓濛辯證法》重新(過度)闡釋Odyssey,說到底反駁的不是《小說理論》,而是《曆史與階級意識》。
評分part of it
History and Class Consciousness 2025 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載