Tom DeMarco和Timothy Lister是大西洋系统协会(www.atlsysguild.com)的负责人。从1979起,他们就在一起演讲,写作和从事国际性的咨询工作,主要涉及软件工程、生产力、估算、管理学和公司文化。 Tom DeMarco的职业生涯开始于贝尔实验室,他是结构化分析和设计的创始人之一,之后,他转向研究软件开发中的管理及其方法。他由于“对信息科学的重大贡献”成为1986年的J.-D. Warnier奖的得主。DeMarco总共已出版了六本书,其中项目管理小说《最后期限》(已由清华大学出版社出版)曾被评为亚马逊网上书店和巴诺书店的最佳畅销书。Timothy Lister的研究领域主要集中在对软件组织和项目的风险管理。Tim也为美国仲裁协会工作,负责解决软件争端。他还是美国国防部下设的软件程序经理网络的航空理事会员。
发表于2025-03-17
Peopleware 2025 pdf epub mobi 电子书
翻译太差了,有时候看了一段琢磨不出到底想说啥意思。 作了一些笔记:软件工作团队管理问题学习 第一部分 人力资源管理 管理问题的实质 本质上,技术管理者工作中的主要问题,与其说是技术问题,不如说是社会学问题 管理问题的实质 成功源自于良好的、与所有的工作参者的人...
评分本书的翻译可谓极差,非常难读,很多时候参考原文,或者需要重新以英文的方式解构之。 本书内容还堪一读,但是对于实作,坦白讲,对于当今中国软件业可谓并无实作之可能。 当今的业态,以外包和工程为主,很多时候,不是在写一个“软件”,而是在堆砌一个建筑。研发的比例少...
评分有能力的还是去读 原文把。 翻译的实在惨不忍睹,难道这些翻译因为多掌握了几门语言,反而把自己的母语丢掉了?原文如果是浓香味醇的鸡汤的话,翻译之后只剩下满锅油腻的油沫,用勺捞捞,还能捞上几只鸡屁。 原本一本有趣的书,被弄成这个样子,实在是罪过罪过。 原本作者的风...
评分图书标签: 软件工程 管理 人件 peopleware management 计算机 软件管理 programming
Summed up in one sentence, Peopleware says this: give smart people physical space, intellectual responsibility and strategic direction. DeMarco and Lister advocate private offices and windows. They advocate creating teams with aligned goals and limited non-team work. They advocate managers finding good staff and putting their fate in the hands of those staff. The manager's function, they write, is not to make people work but to make it possible for people to work.
Why is Peopleware so important to Microsoft and a handful of other successful companies? Why does it inspire such intense devotion amongst the elite group of people who think about software project management for a living? Its direct writing and its amusing anecdotes win it friends. So does its fundamental belief that people will behave decently given the right conditions. Then again, lots of books read easily, contain funny stories and exude goodwill. Peopleware's persuasiveness comes from its numbers - from its simple, cold, numerical demonstration that improving programmers' environments will make them more productive.
The numbers in Peopleware come from DeMarco and Lister's Coding War Games, a series of competitions to complete given coding and testing tasks in minimal time and with minimal defects. The Games have consistently confirmed various known facts of the software game. For instance, the best coders outperform the ten-to-one, but their pay seems only weakly linked to their performance. But DeMarco and Lister also found that the best-performing coders had larger, quieter, more private workspaces. It is for this one empirical finding that Peopleware is best known.
(As an aside, it's worth knowing that DeMarco and Lister tried to track down the research showing that open-plan offices make people more productive. It didn't exist. Cubicle makers just kept saying it, without evidence - a technique Peopleware describes as "proof by repeated assertion".)
Around their Coding Wars data, DeMarco and Lister assembled a theory: that managers should help programmers, designers, writers and other brainworkers to reach a state that psychologists call "flow" - an almost meditative condition where people can achieve important leaps towards solving complex problems. It's the state where you start work, look up, and notice that three hours have passed. But it takes time - perhaps fifteen minutes on average - to get into this state. And DeMarco and Lister that today's typical noisy, cubicled, Dilbertesque office rarely allows people 15 minutes of uninterrupted work. In other words, the world is full of places where a highly-paid and dedicated programmer or creative artist can spend a full day without ever getting any hard-core work. Put another way, the world is full of cheap opportunities for people to make their co-workers more productive, just by building their offices a bit smarter.
A decade and a half after Peopleware was written, and after the arrival of a new young breed of IT companies called Web development firms, it would be nice to think DeMarco and Lister's ideas have been widely adopted. Instead, they remain widely ignored. In an economy where smart employees can increasingly pick and choose, it will be interesting to see how much longer this ignorance can continue.
早点读到就好了
评分For management. But you can refer to look for great companies.
评分看过日文的,凑和,主要啰嗦了一大堆工作环境的事情。
评分做IT相关的应该更有共鸣
评分For management. But you can refer to look for great companies.
Peopleware 2025 pdf epub mobi 电子书