Since its first publication in 1945? Lord Russell's A History of Western Philosophy has been universally acclaimed as the outstanding one-volume work on the subject -- unparalleled in its comprehensiveness, its clarity, its erudition, its grace and wit. In seventy-six chapters he traces philosophy from the rise of Greek civilization to the emergence of logical analysis in the twentieth century. Among the philosophers considered are: Pythagoras, Heraclitus, Parmenides, Empedocles, Anaxagoras, the Atomists, Protagoras, Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, the Cynics, the Sceptics, the Epicureans, the Stoics, Plotinus, Ambrose, Jerome, Augustine, Benedict, Gregory the Great, John the Scot, Aquinas, Duns Scotus, William of Occam, Machiavelli, Erasmus, More, Bacon, Hobbes, Descartes, Spinoza, Leibniz, Locke, Berkeley, Hume, Rousseau, Kant, Hegel, Schopenhauer, Nietzsche, the Utilitarians, Marx, Bergson, James, Dewey, and lastly the philosophers with whom Lord Russell himself is most closely associated -- Cantor, Frege, and Whitehead, co-author with Russell of the monumental Principia Mathematica.
As a slow reader, I've just finished the first 60 pages. As listening to lectures, it's not the knowledge or facts , but the character in mind of the writer, the most valuable part of a book. I've found some sentences touching me, as listed below In study...
评分我觉得罗素的这本《西方哲学史》,如果去掉所有的“废话”,完全可以厚度减半。 这种“废话”不是车轱辘话来回说的普通废话,而是每句话里都有一点点(不重要的)信息量的“高级废话”。它们看上去很重要,但如果你把它们删掉,不仅不会影响全文,还会提高阅读体验。 我也算混...
评分Russell’s A History of Western Philosophy: A Revisit I completely agree with Russell when he said the scope of philosophy is everything between what can be ascertained by exact science and what can only be answered by religion. Every introductory book on...
评分No word could be adequate to express the enormous joy and excitedment I felt when I found an according argument in Bertrand Russell's "A History of Western Philosophy" agreeing a rough idea of mine which, quite intuitionally, occured to me in a conversation...
评分算是我西哲的入门书籍,梳理性比较强,但是其中夹杂了一些八卦故事确实比较...英伦(以前看英国史纪录片就诧异:怎么是由诸多八卦构成的)本来分可以再打高一点的,但是曾读到冯友兰自述Russell以冯友兰英文不过关为由拒绝给他写序,就觉得Russell自我中心了,哲学不是语言学(...
从历史角度和性格形成的角度来解析哲学,确实和很多是不一样的。
评分very biased interpretations
评分终于的终于的终于的终于。。。历时差不多四年。。。我读完了。。。。
评分语言好~
评分感觉就是讲故事
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 onlinetoolsland.com All Rights Reserved. 本本书屋 版权所有