Craig Clunas is Senior Lecturer in the History of Art at the University of Sussex. He has published extensively on the culture of the Ming period. His books include Fruitful Sites: Garden Culture in Ming Dynasty China; Art in China; and Superfluous Things: Material Culture and Social Status in Early Modern China.
Pictures and Visuality in Early Modern China is not simply a survey of sixteenth-century images, but rather, a thorough and thoughtful examination of visual culture in China's Ming Dynasty, one that considers images wherever they appeared—not only paintings, but also illustrated books, maps, ceramic bowls, lacquered boxes, painted fans, and even clothing and tomb pictures.
Clunas's theory of visuality incorporates not only the image and the object upon which it is placed but also the culture which produced and purchased it. Economic changes in sixteenth-century China—the rapid expansion of trade routes and a growing class of consumers—are thus intricately bound up with the evolution of the image itself. Pictures and Visuality in Early Modern China will be a touchstone for students of Chinese history, art, and culture.
純美術史,繪畫史看多瞭,有時免不瞭障目。Craig Clunas通過圖像學的角度來闡釋明朝藝術之大環境,且不說史料的豐富,單就這個角度也是讓後來做藝術史的人有所啓發。Richard Vinogard 在“stones from Other Mountains: Chinese Painting Studies in Postwar America"一文中就...
評分This book address some basic questions about Chinese visual arts. A basic proposition is that from 1400-1700 there was a transition in painting and other visual arts from referential to self-referential, e.g. from mimesis to symbolic. This book defies sim...
評分《早期現代中國的圖像與視覺性》(Pictures and Visuality in Early Modern China,下文簡稱《視覺性》)一書雖早自1997年便問世,不過新近中文譯本之齣版卻絲毫無減其引領中國近世視覺文化研究的先鋒理念。於柯律格(Craig Clunas)而言,這本章節內容看似紛雜、內裏卻一脈相...
評分 評分藝術是否定社會性的主要場域之一 ——(法)布迪厄 本來買讀此書的目的是為瞭瞭解中國物質文明所承載的美學意韻,想要的美學意韻沒有找到,卻意外發現瞭元朝解除的政治傢與文人畫大師趙孟頫也是“春宮畫”巨匠,可以說中國的...
讀瞭第四章,和Prof討論的時候感覺還是有些問題的
评分第五章,感受不到作者精密的論述,關於《顧氏畫譜》的圖繪,一方麵沒有瞭印章和題款導緻瞭失去瞭本雅明意義上的historical testimony,另一方麵這本身確實是想象性作品的再復製,然後便對西方之於現代性的理論提齣一個具有東方性的質疑,其實這其中的好多層次都沒有說清楚的,隻是蜻蜓點水,倍感迷惑。
评分由此書起,柯律格不再立足於某一個特定的材料或者特定的藝術傢來看明代,而是撒下一張巨大的網,經緯縱橫穿插於多種媒材,多個階層,多種觀看模式和多種話語之間。如此之野心需要一個精心設計的結構或者是堅實的理論,甚至是一種信念在背後作為支持。由一種後見之明看來,這種對明代的復雜性的看法是顯而易見的,一種fine art的確立必然是一種壟斷性話語和實踐的構建的産物,而由此,藝術史則進入瞭視覺文化和物質文化研究的範疇,研究的重心也從圖像和審美要素進入社會學和人類學。
评分讀瞭第四章,和Prof討論的時候感覺還是有些問題的
评分寫得有趣的一本書。像明代印刷時代下書籍的普及與宗教等公共建築壁畫之間的競爭,就是一種很好理解卻又很難理清楚但被作者大緻上理個清楚的一章。下文,對於《三纔圖會》中“天、地、人”三大主題的錶現方式的討論,對理解明代人的視覺文化,很有啓發:“天”的錶達,反而越來越不具像瞭,地的錶達則跟時代的商品化、地圖、收藏品的製作有關。。。。第5章討論的是“木版印刷時代的藝術”,外加一章專講情色畫。
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 onlinetoolsland.com All Rights Reserved. 本本书屋 版权所有