Huaiyin Li is professor of modern Chinese history at the University of Texas at Austin.
This work offers the first systematic analysis of writings on modern Chinese history by historians in China from the early twentieth century to the present. It traces the construction of major interpretive schemes, the evolution of dominant historical narratives, and the unfolding of debates on the most controversial issues in different periods. Placing history-writing in the context of political rivalry and ideological contestation, Huaiyin Li explicates how the historians’ dedication to faithfully reconstructing the past was compromised by their commitment to an imagined trajectory of history that fit their present-day agenda and served their needs of political legitimation.
Beginning with an examination of the contrasting narratives of revolution and modernization in the Republican period, the book scrutinizes changes in the revolutionary historiography after 1949, including its disciplinization in the 1950s and early 1960s and radicalization in the rest of the Mao era. It further investigates the rise of the modernization paradigm in the reform era, the crises of master narratives since the late 1990s, and the latest development of the field. Central to the author’s analysis is the issue of truth and falsehood in historical representation. Li contends that both the revolutionary and modernization historiographies before 1949 reflected historians’ lived experiences and contained a degree of authenticity in mirroring the historical processes of their own times. In sharp contrast, both the revolutionary historiography of the Maoist era and the modernization historiography of the reform era were primarily products of historians’ ideological commitment, which distorted and concealed the past no less than revealed it.
In search of a more effective approach to rewriting modern Chinese history, Reinventing Modern China proposes a within-time, open-ended perspective, which allows for different directions in interpreting the events in modern China and views modern Chinese history as an unfinished process remaining to be defined as the country entered the twenty-first century.
發表於2025-03-30
Reinventing Modern China 2025 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
汪榮祖:《現代中國——“重新發明”還是“重新發現”?》 引自http://jds.cass.cn/Item/24260.aspx 時間:2013年12月09日 原網頁標明齣處:東方早報 Reinventing Modern China: Imagination and Authenticity in Chinese Historical Writing Huaiyin Li著 University of Hawa...
評分“在大多數情況下,曆史學傢重鑄過去實際上是藉以錶達其對現實的政治的不同理解,或是闡明他們所錶達的曆史與所支持的政治方案之間的所謂因果關係。” 讀完瞭《大辯論》之後讀這本,一個是講述英美政治中...
評分汪榮祖:《現代中國——“重新發明”還是“重新發現”?》 引自http://jds.cass.cn/Item/24260.aspx 時間:2013年12月09日 原網頁標明齣處:東方早報 Reinventing Modern China: Imagination and Authenticity in Chinese Historical Writing Huaiyin Li著 University of Hawa...
圖書標籤: 海外中國研究 曆史 人類學 近現代史 史學理論 曆史學 英文原版 近代史
沒什麼料
評分理論功底差的結果是災難性的:自由主義的定義等同於現代化;在現代化之外,所謂「自由主義史學」幾乎空無一物;處理不瞭意識形態本身的內在張力和調適性,以及本土化過程中的必然妥協;對historiography的理解基本停留評價和態度的層麵上。
評分理論功底差的結果是災難性的:自由主義的定義等同於現代化;在現代化之外,所謂「自由主義史學」幾乎空無一物;處理不瞭意識形態本身的內在張力和調適性,以及本土化過程中的必然妥協;對historiography的理解基本停留評價和態度的層麵上。
評分文筆這麼糟糕的史學史……怎麼說呢,什麼髒衣服都往“曆史的書寫”這個筐裏扔,是不好的。引言寫得簡直就是大二學生term paper的口氣。
評分文筆這麼糟糕的史學史……怎麼說呢,什麼髒衣服都往“曆史的書寫”這個筐裏扔,是不好的。引言寫得簡直就是大二學生term paper的口氣。
Reinventing Modern China 2025 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載