发表于2025-01-09
Liberty before Liberalism 2025 pdf epub mobi 电子书
改编自斯金纳的讲席教授就职演讲,是其对十七世纪英国宪政自由(共和)派思想家(比如哈灵顿,弥尔顿,Sidney,还有很多更不知名的人…材料丰富就是斯金纳的特点)的回顾研究。斯金纳给他们的观点冠以新罗马自由理论neo-roman theory of liberty的标签。他们的宪政代议制理论有...
评分 评分改编自斯金纳的讲席教授就职演讲,是其对十七世纪英国宪政自由(共和)派思想家(比如哈灵顿,弥尔顿,Sidney,还有很多更不知名的人…材料丰富就是斯金纳的特点)的回顾研究。斯金纳给他们的观点冠以新罗马自由理论neo-roman theory of liberty的标签。他们的宪政代议制理论有...
评分 评分【按语:这本小册子堪称《霍布斯与共和主义自由》的姊妹篇,解释了在17世纪中叶英国革命时期的新罗马理论家(new-roman theorist)or共和派的自由观念及其溯源演变。 新罗马理论家主张:公民自由必须在与自由政府的关系中得到理解,后者中由所有平等公民的意志来制定法律,而自...
图书标签: 政治哲学 自由主义 思想史 剑桥学派 Skinner 哲学 历史 英国
This extended essay by one of the world's leading historians seeks, in its first part, to excavate, and to vindicate, the neo-Roman theory of free citizens and free states as it developed in early-modern Britain. This analysis leads on to a powerful defence of the nature, purposes and goals of intellectual history and the history of ideas. As Quentin Skinner says, 'the intellectual historian can help us to appreciate how far the values embodied in our present way of life, and our present ways of thinking about those values, reflect a series of choices made at different times between different possible worlds'. This essay thus provides one of the most substantial statements yet made about the importance, relevance and potential excitement of this form of historical enquiry. Liberty before Liberalism is based on Quentin Skinner's Inaugural Lecture as Regius Professor of Modern History in the University of Cambridge, delivered in November 1997. Professor Skinner has been awarded the Balzan Prize Life Time Achievement Award for Political Thought, History and Theory. Full details of this award can be found at http://www.balzan.it/News_eng.aspx?ID=2474
Skinner真是好读得有点过分了,一个学者能把学术讲得这么清楚明白本身就是一大功力。虽然Skinner批判我喜爱的Berlin老头子,但确实批判的在理啊。最后一章讲历史学的意义,to prevent bewitchment, to liberate us from the grip of any hegemonal account of values, 醍醐灌顶。
评分Skinner真是好读得有点过分了,一个学者能把学术讲得这么清楚明白本身就是一大功力。虽然Skinner批判我喜爱的Berlin老头子,但确实批判的在理啊。最后一章讲历史学的意义,to prevent bewitchment, to liberate us from the grip of any hegemonal account of values, 醍醐灌顶。
评分Skinner真是好读得有点过分了,一个学者能把学术讲得这么清楚明白本身就是一大功力。虽然Skinner批判我喜爱的Berlin老头子,但确实批判的在理啊。最后一章讲历史学的意义,to prevent bewitchment, to liberate us from the grip of any hegemonal account of values, 醍醐灌顶。
评分Namier-Butterfield-Pocock的史学史问题随处可见,“自由”问题则明显展露出Berlin观念的过量溢出。颇受前代影响的学术关怀,也许才是Skinner总是抛弃处于显著地位的清教-神学论争,而换之以所谓“新罗马”的真实原因。
评分What remains under-explored is the positive account of nature underlying the neo-Roman conception of freedom, along with the republican strand of classical liberalism (e.g. Mill, Tocqueville) which treats civic virtue as the sinew of a health body politic.
Liberty before Liberalism 2025 pdf epub mobi 电子书