This extended essay by one of the world's leading historians seeks, in its first part, to excavate, and to vindicate, the neo-Roman theory of free citizens and free states as it developed in early-modern Britain. This analysis leads on to a powerful defence of the nature, purposes and goals of intellectual history and the history of ideas. As Quentin Skinner says, 'the intellectual historian can help us to appreciate how far the values embodied in our present way of life, and our present ways of thinking about those values, reflect a series of choices made at different times between different possible worlds'. This essay thus provides one of the most substantial statements yet made about the importance, relevance and potential excitement of this form of historical enquiry. Liberty before Liberalism is based on Quentin Skinner's Inaugural Lecture as Regius Professor of Modern History in the University of Cambridge, delivered in November 1997. Professor Skinner has been awarded the Balzan Prize Life Time Achievement Award for Political Thought, History and Theory. Full details of this award can be found at http://www.balzan.it/News_eng.aspx?ID=2474
發表於2025-02-02
Liberty before Liberalism 2025 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
【按語:這本小冊子堪稱《霍布斯與共和主義自由》的姊妹篇,解釋瞭在17世紀中葉英國革命時期的新羅馬理論傢(new-roman theorist)or共和派的自由觀念及其溯源演變。 新羅馬理論傢主張:公民自由必須在與自由政府的關係中得到理解,後者中由所有平等公民的意誌來製定法律,而自...
評分 評分不包括意思正確但文法不通的地方, 也不包括已經在這篇文章裏指齣過的錯誤: http://www.douban.com/subject/discussion/1018247/ 第5頁: 誤: “霍布斯認為, 正是法律的力量纔讓你的自然自由不受傷害” 正: “霍布斯認為, 即使是法律的強製力量也沒有傷害你的自然自由” 誤:...
評分不包括意思正確但文法不通的地方, 也不包括已經在這篇文章裏指齣過的錯誤: http://www.douban.com/subject/discussion/1018247/ 第5頁: 誤: “霍布斯認為, 正是法律的力量纔讓你的自然自由不受傷害” 正: “霍布斯認為, 即使是法律的強製力量也沒有傷害你的自然自由” 誤:...
評分不包括意思正確但文法不通的地方, 也不包括已經在這篇文章裏指齣過的錯誤: http://www.douban.com/subject/discussion/1018247/ 第5頁: 誤: “霍布斯認為, 正是法律的力量纔讓你的自然自由不受傷害” 正: “霍布斯認為, 即使是法律的強製力量也沒有傷害你的自然自由” 誤:...
圖書標籤: 政治哲學 自由主義 思想史 劍橋學派 Skinner 哲學 曆史 英國
Skinner從不讓人失望
評分應該早點讀。
評分Skinner真是好讀得有點過分瞭,一個學者能把學術講得這麼清楚明白本身就是一大功力。雖然Skinner批判我喜愛的Berlin老頭子,但確實批判的在理啊。最後一章講曆史學的意義,to prevent bewitchment, to liberate us from the grip of any hegemonal account of values, 醍醐灌頂。
評分慚愧錶示這是我第一本從頭讀到尾的英文書,內容本身不難,但總覺得和波考剋的說法有點微妙不同。
評分Skinner真是好讀得有點過分瞭,一個學者能把學術講得這麼清楚明白本身就是一大功力。雖然Skinner批判我喜愛的Berlin老頭子,但確實批判的在理啊。最後一章講曆史學的意義,to prevent bewitchment, to liberate us from the grip of any hegemonal account of values, 醍醐灌頂。
Liberty before Liberalism 2025 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載