王斑，福建廈門人，1988年赴美留學。1993年獲加州大學洛杉磯分校比較文學博士學位。先後任教於紐約州立大學、新澤西羅格斯大學，現為美國斯坦福大學東亞係教授。學術寫作涉及文學、美學、曆史、國際政治、電影及大眾文化。主要著作《曆史與記憶——全球現代性的質疑》（香港：牛津大學齣版社，2004），《全球化陰影下的曆史與記憶》（南京大學齣版社，2006）。與Ann Kaplan閤編Trauma and Cinema（Hong Kong University Press,2003），與張旭東閤譯本雅明的《啓迪》（香港：牛津大學齣版社，1998）等。1997與2001年兩次獲美國人文基金學術研究奬勵。

TThrough a comparative analysis of diverse texts and contexts, this book offers a cultural history of the interplay between the aesthetic and the political in the formation of personal and collective identity that crystallizes into the Chinese aesthetic of the sublime.

It describes how various kinds of politics are aestheticized and how aesthetic manifestations are bound up with prevalent ideologies and politics. In this book, politics refers to various projects for fashioning a viable self, a workable personal and collective identity in the crisis-ridden history of modern China. These projects include imagining a political subject adapted to the modern nation-state, mobilizing revolutionary masses as subjects of the Communist state, sustaining a unified self despite the challenges to traditional culture, erecting the sublime figure of the revolutionary hero, and, finally, debunking the grand images of the hero and history in post-Mao culture. Throughout, the author seeks to delineate the ways the political masquerades as aesthetic discourse and aesthetic experience.

Covering a wide range of material from fiction, poetry, aesthetics, and political discourse to memoirs, film, and historical documents, the book reconsiders a number of prominent cultural figures, including Wang Guowei, Cai Yuanpei, Lu Xun, Eileen Chang, Mao Zedong, Zhu Guangqian, and Li Zehou. It also analyzes such important cultural features and events as Western influences on the formation of modern Chinese aesthetic discourse, modernist writings, Revolutionary Cinema, the Cultural Revolution, and New Wave Fiction.

An East-West comparative approach informs the analysis, which engages in dialogue with Kant, Hegel, Freud, Marx, and Walter Benjamin, as well as Terry Eagleton and other contemporary critics. The author's interdisciplinary method, which emphasizes the interaction among text, context, and the psyche, both presents new materials and illuminates familiar texts and phenomena from the perspective of the political-aesthetic nexus.