Professor Ko’s research interest is the everyday lives of women in China –along with the domestic objects they made by hand–as a significant part of country’s cultural, economic and political development. She works at the intersections of anthropology, history, and women’s studies.
Ko’s recent book, Cinderella Sisters: A Revisionist History of Footbinding, published in 2005, shattered the popular conception of footbinding as a tool to oppress women and demonstrated that it was instead a source of female identity, purpose, pride, and power. It won the Joan Kelly Memorial Prize of the American Historical Association, Recently, she has been turning her attention to the skills of women’s artisans such as embroiderers, stone carvers, and ceramic artists. Her research during spring semester, 2004, as a senior fellow at the Hopkins-Nanjing Center’s Institute for International Research in Nanjing, focused on the importance of ancient art of silk-weaving for a study of the dress-making tradition and domestic work culture in China’s silk industry region. More recently, as a fellow at the Needham Research Institute in Cambridge, England, in spring 2007, she researched ancient swordsmith legends for insights into the relations between bodily investments and transformation of matter.
In addition to Cinderella’s Sisters, Ko has written numerous books and publications, including “Between the Boudoir and the Global Market: Shen Shou, Embroidery and Modernity at the Turn of the Twentieth Century,” in Looking Modern (forthcoming), Every Step a Lotus (2001), and Teachers of the Inner Chambers (1994). She is also co-editor of Women and Confucian Cultures in Pre-modern China, Korea, and Japan.
Ko’s courses include Chinese cultural history, body histories, women and culture in 17th century China, and Confucian cultures.
Ko earned undergraduate and advanced degrees at Stanford University, including the doctorate. She has received a number of fellowships and awards. She was a member of the School of Historical Studies at the Institute for Advanced Study (2000-2001), a fellow of the John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation (2000-2001) and a fellow at the Center for Critical Analysis of Contemporary Culture, Rutgers University (1999-2000). Before joining the Barnard faculty in 2001, Professor Ko taught at Rutgers University.
Rejecting popular image and accepted scholarship on the status of women in premodern China, this pathbreaking work argues that literate gentrywomen in seventeenth-century Jiangnan were far from oppressed or silenced. As writers, readers, editors, and teachers, these women created a rich culture and meaningful existence from within the constraints of the male-dominated Confucian system. The author reconstructs the social, emotional, and intellectual worlds of these women from the interstices between ideology, practice, and self-perception. Born out of curiosity about how premodern Chinese women lived, this book proposes a new way to conceptualize China's past. This reconception rests on the premise that by understanding how women lived, we better grasp the dynamics of gender relations and gain a more complete knowledge of the values of Chinese culture, the functioning of Chinese society, and the nature of historical change. The book examines three types of women's communities that developed in this environment: domestic, social, and public. Women from different families, age groups, and social stations were brought together by their shared love of poetry and common concerns as women. Though important at the time, most of these ties proved fragile and transitory because of women's inherently ambivalent position. The author argues that the gender system identified women both by their shared gender, or women-as-same, and by their social station, or women-as-different. This contradiction accorded women freedoms within their own limited spheres, but these spheres were fragmented and often demarcated by the class of male kin. As a result, even the most mobile and articulate of women had noinstitutional means of launching fundamental attacks on the gender system.
發表於2024-12-25
Teachers of the Inner Chambers 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
總之,封建的、父權的、壓迫的“中國傳統”是一項非曆史的發明,它是三種意識形態和政治傳統罕見閤流的結果,即“五四”新文化運動、共産主義革命和西方女權主義學說。 受害的“封建”女性形象之所以根深蒂固,在某種程度上是齣自一種分析上的混淆,即錯誤地將標準的規定視為...
評分僅以46頁其中一段為例: 原文:“There is also the frequent admonition that excess betrays vulgarity.”居然翻譯成:“還有一些勸告,其庸俗性錶現的更過分。” 先不說您語法瞭,單說把vulgar譯成“庸俗”就完全無視語境吧?!附庸風雅這種正麵嚮上積極健康有益市民文化...
評分雖然女性研究熱潮早過,但如今美國各大學比較文學係仍保留專門的女性研究方嚮。中國大陸的女性研究似以現當代為多,名正言順世界影響,似乎中國古代女性兩韆年都是行屍走肉。這本書理性客觀,材料豐富,論述嚴密,體現社會演化的復雜性,學術功底很厲害,讓人感嘆理論確實是指...
評分從一開始就不喜歡纔女,有關纔女的種種傳聞,我都覺得做作而虛僞。纔女是僞裝成特立獨行的討好,是對人帶答不理的撒嬌小貓。 你說這是嫉妒,也可以。 在男人記述的曆史裏,纔女更是一種符閤他們想象的産物,美麗、柔弱、體貼、風趣……還會在來不及成黃臉婆之前香消玉殞,給...
評分有時候一個問題就是開啓一個嶄新世界的鑰匙。 讀《閨塾師——明末清初江南的纔女文化》時,高彥頤的一個發問就令我覺得驚異:“儒傢的社會性彆體係為何在如此長的時間內運轉得這樣靈活順暢?婦女們從這一體係中獲得過什麼好處?”這一發問是對五四史觀的顛覆。因為五四史觀...
圖書標籤: 女性 Gender 海外中國研究 高彥頤 明清史 DorothyKo 海外中國研究叢書 文化
作為一本批判“五四女性史觀”的經典之作,此書有兩個缺陷,都跟它的subject matter——明清之際的江南文人階級纔女——有關:1. 作者提到的江南纔女屬於士紳階級,是否status overruling gender纔使得她們比一般平民婦女甚至內陸同階層婦女有更多參與文化生活的機會?2. 作者不斷強調明清之交的社會與政治轉型給瞭江南閨秀拓展女性空間的機會,那麼是不是可以認為明清朝代更替是個特殊情況,本書中的江南纔女隻是特殊歷史背景下的temporary transgression?結閤Matthew Sommer對清代婚姻與性別的法律研究,雍正改革大大延伸瞭國傢對性規範的治理,Ko書中提到的晚明名妓文化也不復存在。兩個缺陷結閤起來,本書是否真正推翻瞭它意圖批判的“五四女性史觀”?
評分就是紅樓夢啊。。。
評分其實還是夾縫中生存…我非常喜歡高老師對Bourdieu理論的運用,嗯再加上他對cultural capital的論述,實在是太適閤寫明末清初的女畫傢們瞭……
評分其實還是夾縫中生存…我非常喜歡高老師對Bourdieu理論的運用,嗯再加上他對cultural capital的論述,實在是太適閤寫明末清初的女畫傢們瞭……
評分按照周老師的話來說,比Susan Mann的那本Precious Records要挑釁的多,不過我還是覺得她敘述很好,但是邏輯有點問題,最後整本書感覺像隔靴搔癢,說瞭好多又沒說好。
Teachers of the Inner Chambers 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載