Christian Davenport, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Christian Davenport is Professor of Political Science and Faculty Associate at the Center for Political Studies at the University of Michigan, as well as Global Fellow at the Peace Research Institute Oslo. He is the author of State Repression and the Promise of Democratic Peace (Cambridge University Press, 2007) and Media Bias, Perspective and State Repression: The Black Panther Party (Cambridge University Press, 2010), which won an award for the best book in racial politics and social movements from the American Political Science Association. He is the editor of Repression and Mobilization, with Carol Mueller and Hank Johnston (2004), and Paths to State Repression: Human Rights Violations and Contentious Politics (2000).
How do social movements die? Some explanations highlight internal factors like factionalization, whereas others stress external factors like repression. Christian Davenport offers an alternative explanation where both factors interact. Drawing on organizational, as well as individual-level, explanations, Davenport argues that social movement death is the outgrowth of a coevolutionary dynamic whereby challengers, influenced by their understanding of what states will do to oppose them, attempt to recruit, motivate, calm, and prepare constituents while governments attempt to hinder all of these processes at the same time. Davenport employs a previously unavailable database that contains information on a black nationalist/secessionist organization, the Republic of New Africa, and the activities of authorities in the U.S. city of Detroit and state and federal authorities.
發表於2024-12-22
How Social Movements Die 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
圖書標籤: 社會運動 社會學 政治學 政治 social.movement 英文版 自由主義 社會科學
1、新非洲共和國,一個目標遠大而在策略上弱爆瞭的運動;2、強調外在因素(國傢壓迫)和內在因素(重估境況和建立信任)互動對社運消亡的影響;3、材料書寫缺乏曆史感,理解生硬,但在北美政治科學傢裏還不算最差的;4、過於強調從反抗者和壓迫者所采取的策略來理解成敗,忘瞭什麼叫“大勢所趨”。
評分Revolution ends as an institution,the revolutionary continues.governments might try to kill a revolutionary institution, eliminate some revolutionaries, and modify the revolutionary agenda, but it does not kill the revolution – at least not by itself.
評分Revolution ends as an institution,the revolutionary continues.governments might try to kill a revolutionary institution, eliminate some revolutionaries, and modify the revolutionary agenda, but it does not kill the revolution – at least not by itself.
評分不太好讀,因為缺乏案例相關背景知識,語言也不是很平易。社會運動失敗的解釋有兩種,外因論和內因論。本書展示並嘗試概念化兩者的互動,國傢鎮壓,組織迴應,國傢再變更策略,你來我玩,抗爭組織就完瞭。Davenport很善於將已有文獻綜述成恰好有個gap的兩個極端,其實很值得學習。概念化雖然很重要但是容易走嚮瑣碎的過度概念化,於是完整事件要麼支離破碎要麼邏輯太單一。不過這也是一個理論發展較為堅實領域內做新近研究難以繞開的問題。
評分Revolution ends as an institution,the revolutionary continues.governments might try to kill a revolutionary institution, eliminate some revolutionaries, and modify the revolutionary agenda, but it does not kill the revolution – at least not by itself.
How Social Movements Die 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載