发表于2024-11-24
In the Voice of Others 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书
As the author says, "My intent here is to show that Music Bureau poetry can be best understood within the conventions of intratextuality". That is really amazing to read this book in such perspective and spectrum. Prof.Joseph's logic is clear enough to outl...
评分As the author says, "My intent here is to show that Music Bureau poetry can be best understood within the conventions of intratextuality". That is really amazing to read this book in such perspective and spectrum. Prof.Joseph's logic is clear enough to outl...
评分As the author says, "My intent here is to show that Music Bureau poetry can be best understood within the conventions of intratextuality". That is really amazing to read this book in such perspective and spectrum. Prof.Joseph's logic is clear enough to outl...
评分As the author says, "My intent here is to show that Music Bureau poetry can be best understood within the conventions of intratextuality". That is really amazing to read this book in such perspective and spectrum. Prof.Joseph's logic is clear enough to outl...
评分As the author says, "My intent here is to show that Music Bureau poetry can be best understood within the conventions of intratextuality". That is really amazing to read this book in such perspective and spectrum. Prof.Joseph's logic is clear enough to outl...
图书标签: 海外汉学 域外汉学 中国古典文学 诗歌 英语 文学研究 四 古典文学
文本性的角度对作者意图、以及作者能看到的文本的要求很高,而且书中提出的互文性要迟至《乐府诗集》才彻底实现,不免有拿着乐府诗集的文本形态倒着回去读单篇诗作的意思(尤其是第四章)。正好和Shields写《花间集》做个对比,类似的思路,放在花间集合适很多。讨论互文,本身是去历史化的(二四两章),但全书又显示出很强的对诗体发展历史的预设,把乐府看作是一个以《乐府诗集》为终点线的“过程”。此外Allen对intratextuality的定义很大程度上把它框定在了同一乐府诗题下的不同诗作之间,但实际讨论时主题、修辞、语词的流动性与共享往往溢出了这个限定范围。对饮马长城窟行的阅读有些勉强,然后第四章的四位讨论对象不太容易捏到一起去。不过最奇怪的大概是全书对voice根本就没怎么着墨…
评分论点很棒!然而读到具体的论述尤其是文本分析的时候常常会露出@@或者==的表情……
评分论点很棒!然而读到具体的论述尤其是文本分析的时候常常会露出@@或者==的表情……
评分文本性的角度对作者意图、以及作者能看到的文本的要求很高,而且书中提出的互文性要迟至《乐府诗集》才彻底实现,不免有拿着乐府诗集的文本形态倒着回去读单篇诗作的意思(尤其是第四章)。正好和Shields写《花间集》做个对比,类似的思路,放在花间集合适很多。讨论互文,本身是去历史化的(二四两章),但全书又显示出很强的对诗体发展历史的预设,把乐府看作是一个以《乐府诗集》为终点线的“过程”。此外Allen对intratextuality的定义很大程度上把它框定在了同一乐府诗题下的不同诗作之间,但实际讨论时主题、修辞、语词的流动性与共享往往溢出了这个限定范围。对饮马长城窟行的阅读有些勉强,然后第四章的四位讨论对象不太容易捏到一起去。不过最奇怪的大概是全书对voice根本就没怎么着墨…
评分基於intertextuality(互文性)與intratextuality(內文性)的理論討論樂府詩的若干問題,結構佈局精彩紛呈,對樂府詩史上令人迷惑的現象的解釋有不少發人深省的觀點和假設,研究方法值得借鑑。文本分析稍嫌薄弱。#壹陸讀#113 #SOAS
In the Voice of Others 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书