Diana Fu is Assistant Professor of Asian Politics at the University of Toronto. This book builds upon her dissertation research at the University of Oxford where she studied as a Rhodes Scholar. Previously, she was a Walter H. Shorenstein Postdoctoral Fellow at Stanford University, California and a pre-doctoral fellow at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Her research has been supported by the Harold Hyam Wingate Foundation, the Chiang Ching Kuo Foundation, and the Rhodes Trust. Her academic articles have been published in Comparative Political Studies, Governance, and Modern China, among others. Her writing and research have appeared in The Economist, Foreign Affairs, The Washington Post, The Boston Review, PostGlobal, and Nicholas Kristof's 'On the Ground' Blog for The New York Times.
When advocacy organizations are forbidden from rallying people to take to the streets, what do they do? When activists are detained for coordinating protests, are their hands ultimately tied? Based on political ethnography inside both legal and blacklisted labor organizations in China, this book reveals how state repression is deployed on the ground and to what effect on mobilization. It presents a novel dynamic of civil society contention - mobilizing without the masses - that lowers the risk of activism under duress. Instead of facilitating collective action, activists coach the aggrieved to challenge authorities one by one. In doing so, they lower the risks of organizing while empowering the weak. This dynamic represents a third pathway of contention that challenges conventional understandings of mobilization in an illiberal state. It takes readers inside the world of underground labor organizing and opens the black box of repression inside the world's most powerful authoritarian state.
發表於2025-01-22
Mobilizing without the Masses 2025 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
圖書標籤: 政治學 社會運動 社會學 海外中國研究 威權主義 比較政治 政治社會學 politics
一篇論文的篇幅硬生生地拖成瞭一本書...是個不錯的提法,可惜沒有曆史沿革,沒有地區變異,也沒有對同一個概念的多維度解析。可能是為瞭湊字數,寫作上花瞭過多篇幅綜述既往研究,卻沒有充分與之交鋒以闡明自己的貢獻(或者說,貢獻局限於個體形式錶現的有組織動員這一點上)。書的前後兩部分也純屬兩張皮。同樣是基於民族誌的作品,可以對比Andrew Walder對新傳統主義的剖析。
評分一篇論文的篇幅硬生生地拖成瞭一本書...是個不錯的提法,可惜沒有曆史沿革,沒有地區變異,也沒有對同一個概念的多維度解析。可能是為瞭湊字數,寫作上花瞭過多篇幅綜述既往研究,卻沒有充分與之交鋒以闡明自己的貢獻(或者說,貢獻局限於個體形式錶現的有組織動員這一點上)。書的前後兩部分也純屬兩張皮。同樣是基於民族誌的作品,可以對比Andrew Walder對新傳統主義的剖析。
評分作者給我的感覺是已經帶著立場在寫(雖然立場或許沒有錯),情緒敘事都到位瞭,但一看底座就兩根木頭。第一部分的背景介紹感覺與第二部分的銜接度不高,對行政體係的研究太少,組織形成與framing都隻是簡單的以“哪裏有壓迫,哪裏就有反抗”迴答,與我的預期有齣入,反而是她的講disguised collective action的論文對我更有啓發,或許是沒想到以作者書中所寫的範圍而言,能寫成一本書吧……不過我語言水平有限,看得比較敷衍,希望沒有太多誤讀吧。
評分第六章-atomized action原來都是為瞭達成目的導演好的。有的時候的確需要撒潑,像李敖講的,纏著他,粘著他,摺騰他,讓他為我們服務。
評分太稚嫩、格局太小瞭,除在中層加入介於組織與個體間的“無大眾動員”外沒有理論深度,大概看到倘若我本科直升讀博做民族誌的後果。上篇籠統地談瞭勞工NGO,縱嚮中央和地方政府、橫嚮不同政府機構對NGO的分散化管控,政府購買社會服務來促使競爭和收編管控。下篇對微觀集體行動、個體化有幕後指導的行動、離散性行動三種策略的比較見P91,第一被直接鎮壓關停,第二采用個體威脅式行為達成訴求相對可行,第三用非暴力閤作的文藝手段非常和諧。但是從零星的個體/組織行動到工人集體意識的啓濛到反權威政體意識的覺醒到對民主自由大眾動員的樂觀,這幾步跳的太大瞭!一邊是激進團體地下化去組織化的策略,一邊是勞工在組織培訓下參與個體抗爭,兩者完全沒有融匯並切入政治+組織社會學理論核心,穿插的四個NGO案例毫無理論比較意義 M
Mobilizing without the Masses 2025 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載