Taking Rights Seriously

罗纳德·德沃金（Ronald．Myles．Dworkin , 1931—— ）德沃金是当代最著名、最活跃的法理学家之一。德沃金出生于美国马萨诸塞州，先后在哈佛学院、牛津大学和哈佛大学获得学士学位，在耶鲁大学获得硕士学位。他起初的兴趣是哲学，但在牛津时开始学习法学，从此发现了自己的真正兴趣所在，随后进入哈佛大学法学院，1957年毕业后进入美国最高法院，任法官汉德（Learned Hand）的办事员，以后又当过律师。1962年成为耶鲁大学教授，1969年他应邀担任英国牛津大学法理学首席教授，直到1998年。1975年开始同时担任纽约大学法学的教授至今，他还不定期地担任过哈佛大学、康奈尔大学、普林斯顿大学教授，1984年以来还是伦敦大学（大学学院）的客座教授。。2002年5月中旬应邀来我国清华大学、复旦大学和浙江大学作过讲演。罗纳德·德沃金被公认为当代英美法学理论传统中最有影响的人物之一。总的来说，德沃金所展现的是一种由政治自由主义指导的法理学。他的每一部重要的著作都引起广泛的讨论，其中既有赞同者，亦有批判者。

出版者:Gerald Duckworth & Co Ltd

作者:Ronald Dworkin

页数:392

出版时间:1978-5-16

价格:USD 46.63

装帧:Paperback

isbn号码:9780715611746

图书标签:Dworkin法哲学法学哲学自然法罗纳德·德沃金［Ronald·Dworkin］Jurisprudence

读后感

德沃金的名著《认真对待权利》中一个章节《善良违法》，从自然法角度补充了流行的实在法观点。他区分了政治道德和政治法律，确定了最高法院对政治道德的介入。对不同意见的记录在案，可能推动立法的进步。有些立法是从功利角度出发，而不是从政治道德角度，是为了社会福利最大...  

Great piece to attack Hart's rule of recognition! BUT I really surrendered when I came across Hard Cases and the Right Thesis to look for secondary materials...  

Great piece to attack Hart's rule of recognition! BUT I really surrendered when I came across Hard Cases and the Right Thesis to look for secondary materials...  

用户评价

Finally kill this book! Some arguments, in particular, Dworkin's theory of adjudication, are quite powerful attacks on legal positivism, while others, are less plausible and comprehensible construction a consistent theory of jurisprudence would entail. Imaginative enough though, clarity is lacking.

Finally kill this book! Some arguments, in particular, Dworkin's theory of adjudication, are quite powerful attacks on legal positivism, while others, are less plausible and comprehensible construction a consistent theory of jurisprudence would entail. Imaginative enough though, clarity is lacking.

Finally kill this book! Some arguments, in particular, Dworkin's theory of adjudication, are quite powerful attacks on legal positivism, while others, are less plausible and comprehensible construction a consistent theory of jurisprudence would entail. Imaginative enough though, clarity is lacking.

Finally kill this book! Some arguments, in particular, Dworkin's theory of adjudication, are quite powerful attacks on legal positivism, while others, are less plausible and comprehensible construction a consistent theory of jurisprudence would entail. Imaginative enough though, clarity is lacking.

Really hard to understand, but it is a great piece of Dworkin~