Kenneth Pomeranz , 1958—
著名历史学家,曾任美国历史学会会长(2013—2014),“加州学派”代表人物。1980年于康奈尔大学获学士学位,1988年于耶鲁大学获博士学位,师从史景迁。现任美国芝加哥大学历史系教授。主要著作有:《腹地的构建 :华北内地的国家、社会和经济(1853—1937)》(荣获1994年费正清奖)、《大分流:欧洲、中国及现代世界经济的发展》(荣获2000年费正清奖、2001年世界历史协会年度图书奖)、《贸易打造的世界:1400年至今的社会、文化与世界经济》(与史蒂文•托皮克合著)等。
译者
马俊亚
1966年生,江苏沭阳人。现为南京大学历史系教授、博士生导师。主要著作有:《规模经济与区域发展——近代江南地区企业经营现代化研究》《被牺牲的“局部”:淮北社会生态变迁研究(1680—1949)》等。
This wholly original reassessment of critical issues in modern Chinese history traces social, economic, and ecological change in inland North China during the late Qing dynasty and the Republic. Using many new sources, Kenneth Pomeranz argues that the development of certain regions entailed the systematic underdevelopment of other regions. He maps changes in local finance, farming, transportation, taxation, and popular protest, and analyzes the consequences for different classes, sub-regions, and genders.Pomeranz attributes these diverse developments to several causes: the growing but incomplete integration of North China into the world economy, the state's abandonment of many hinterland areas and traditional functions, and the effect of local social structures on these processes. He shows that hinterlands were made, not merely found, and were powerfully shaped by the strategies of local groups as well as outside forces. This wholly original reassessment of critical issues in modern Chinese history traces social, economic, and ecological change in inland North China during the late Qing dynasty and the Republic. Using many new sources, Kenneth Pomeranz argues that the development of certain regions entailed the systematic underdevelopment of other regions. He maps changes in local finance, farming, transportation, taxation, and popular protest, and analyzes the consequences for different classes, sub-regions, and genders.Pomeranz attributes these diverse developments to several causes: the growing but incomplete integration of North China into the world economy, the state's abandonment of many hinterland areas and traditional functions, and the effect of local social structures on these processes. He shows that hinterlands were made, not merely found, and were powerfully shaped by the strategies of local groups as well as outside forces.
海外中国研究系列的书一次又一次地让我感觉到,我虽然生长在这片土地上,但是对这片土地充满了肤浅与错误的认识和理解。Man are born ignorant,not stupid。既然知道自己的错误在哪里,就要努力地改正嗷。 第一章关于信贷和货币的看不懂嗷,没有经济学和金融学的基础知识,完...
评分书是汉学研究名作,但翻译大部分非常拗口,能看出英文原句的结构,部分基本属于狗屁不通的程度,阅读的大部分时间在寻找句子的主谓宾结构——还经常找不到,然后再努力寻找词和词之间的逻辑,猜测英文原文是什么。 就算是研究生翻译的,你老师既然署名,能看一遍吗? 责任编辑...
评分作者勾勒的那片区域不是任何地方的腹地,不是京城的,不是内陆的,更不是常常提到的华北的。在中华帝国时期,那一片狭长区域并不特殊,或者说无论传教士的渗透、列强的入侵以及各种不同原因的民变,都未曾以那片区域为中心。所以这个构建,真让我有些惶惑。但越是这样一块中华...
评分 评分“加州学派”是兴起于上世纪80年代美国汉学界的一个学术流派。说是学派,但它大概只是一个对几位年轻学者较为松散和概括性的统称。他们的观点新颖、相似,研究方向相关,却又时常相互批评。他们并没有形成封闭性的学术理论,称为学派似乎比较牵强。 彭慕兰是当中的佼佼者,其他...
《腹地的构建》的英文版。
评分Quite impressive; not happy about the mercantilist explanation (way too static), but will leave that for a later discussion.
评分觉得比great divergence强多了。。
评分觉得比great divergence强多了。。
评分雖然不能完全贊同他的觀點,但這本寫得的確不錯。感覺跟大分流的風格完全不同
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 onlinetoolsland.com All Rights Reserved. 本本书屋 版权所有