Kenneth Pomeranz , 1958—
著名历史学家,曾任美国历史学会会长(2013—2014),“加州学派”代表人物。1980年于康奈尔大学获学士学位,1988年于耶鲁大学获博士学位,师从史景迁。现任美国芝加哥大学历史系教授。主要著作有:《腹地的构建 :华北内地的国家、社会和经济(1853—1937)》(荣获1994年费正清奖)、《大分流:欧洲、中国及现代世界经济的发展》(荣获2000年费正清奖、2001年世界历史协会年度图书奖)、《贸易打造的世界:1400年至今的社会、文化与世界经济》(与史蒂文•托皮克合著)等。
译者
马俊亚
1966年生,江苏沭阳人。现为南京大学历史系教授、博士生导师。主要著作有:《规模经济与区域发展——近代江南地区企业经营现代化研究》《被牺牲的“局部”:淮北社会生态变迁研究(1680—1949)》等。
发表于2024-05-02
The Making of a Hinterland 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书
当彭慕兰在写作其博士论文时,一个现象吸引他注意。清末民国时期,山东西部地区银子与铜钱的比价,比起胶东半岛北部沿海地区要高,比起上海所在的长三角地区更是高得吓人。同时,在鲁西内部济宁与临清之间,比价也有着较大的差异。按理说,济宁离长三角更近,且有着运河水运之...
评分 评分书是汉学研究名作,但翻译大部分非常拗口,能看出英文原句的结构,部分基本属于狗屁不通的程度,阅读的大部分时间在寻找句子的主谓宾结构——还经常找不到,然后再努力寻找词和词之间的逻辑,猜测英文原文是什么。 就算是研究生翻译的,你老师既然署名,能看一遍吗? 责任编辑...
评分“加州学派”是兴起于上世纪80年代美国汉学界的一个学术流派。说是学派,但它大概只是一个对几位年轻学者较为松散和概括性的统称。他们的观点新颖、相似,研究方向相关,却又时常相互批评。他们并没有形成封闭性的学术理论,称为学派似乎比较牵强。 彭慕兰是当中的佼佼者,其他...
图书标签: 彭慕兰 海外中国研究 历史 经济史 腹地的构建 中国近代史 费正清东亚研究奖 社会史
This wholly original reassessment of critical issues in modern Chinese history traces social, economic, and ecological change in inland North China during the late Qing dynasty and the Republic. Using many new sources, Kenneth Pomeranz argues that the development of certain regions entailed the systematic underdevelopment of other regions. He maps changes in local finance, farming, transportation, taxation, and popular protest, and analyzes the consequences for different classes, sub-regions, and genders.Pomeranz attributes these diverse developments to several causes: the growing but incomplete integration of North China into the world economy, the state's abandonment of many hinterland areas and traditional functions, and the effect of local social structures on these processes. He shows that hinterlands were made, not merely found, and were powerfully shaped by the strategies of local groups as well as outside forces. This wholly original reassessment of critical issues in modern Chinese history traces social, economic, and ecological change in inland North China during the late Qing dynasty and the Republic. Using many new sources, Kenneth Pomeranz argues that the development of certain regions entailed the systematic underdevelopment of other regions. He maps changes in local finance, farming, transportation, taxation, and popular protest, and analyzes the consequences for different classes, sub-regions, and genders.Pomeranz attributes these diverse developments to several causes: the growing but incomplete integration of North China into the world economy, the state's abandonment of many hinterland areas and traditional functions, and the effect of local social structures on these processes. He shows that hinterlands were made, not merely found, and were powerfully shaped by the strategies of local groups as well as outside forces.
Too insightful to believe that it was published 23 years ago. (2016年11月01日)
评分One thing shared by this book and The Great Divergence: regional variations (perspective of comparison) might be interrelated consequences of a same historical process (perspective of cross-regional network).
评分《腹地的构建》的英文版。
评分主要是描述,作者基本功不错,不过书意思不大。不如其七年后的The Great Divergence.
评分Quite impressive; not happy about the mercantilist explanation (way too static), but will leave that for a later discussion.
The Making of a Hinterland 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书