How Judges Think 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书

☆☆☆☆☆
简体网页||繁体网页

How Judges Think 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书著者简介

理查德.波斯纳，先后以最优生和年级第一名毕业于耶鲁大学英文系（1959）和哈佛大学法学院（1962）。曾任美国联邦最高法院大法官助理、联邦政府律师、斯坦福大学法学院副教授（1968）、芝加哥大学法学院教授（1969）和讲座教授。1981年出任美国联邦第七巡回区上诉法院法官至今（1993～2000年任首席法官），同时担任芝加哥大学法学院高级讲师。

How Judges Think 电子书图书目录

下载链接在页面底部

点击这里下载

facebook linkedin mastodon messenger pinterest reddit telegram twitter viber vkontakte whatsapp 复制链接

想要找书就要到本本书屋

onlinetoolsland.com

立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本页

你会得到大惊喜!!

发表于2024-11-01

How Judges Think 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书

喜欢 How Judges Think 电子书的读者还喜欢

How Judges Think 电子书读后感

评分☆☆☆☆☆

说苏力老师在代译序里对法条主义的批评，完全没有建设性，完全是破坏性的，苏力老师也没啥特别主张，单纯就是为了批评批评“法条主义”罢了。所以大家千万不要认真！！且说，作为规范学的法学，抛开“规范”，那还剩下什么？？？作为法治的后进国家，我们进步的基础就是“法...

评分☆☆☆☆☆

一说起美国的法官，我们往往有一种先入为主的印象：专业，不讲政治，只讲法律。法律如何规定，法官便如何断案，他们不需要考虑除法条以外的其他因素。这时候，浮现在我们脑海里的是那句著名的法谚：风能进，雨能进，国王不能进。美国的法院果真是与政治绝缘的么？我最近在读...

评分☆☆☆☆☆

经验地理解法官的思维和行为 ———《法官如何思考》代译序/朱苏力法官当然首先必须依法，但他还必须考虑“治国”和“办事”。这就是政治的考量　　所谓“政治的”，波斯纳界定，它首先指法官在开放领域的被迫的“偶尔立法”。它还可以指一些看似纯技术性判断　...

评分☆☆☆☆☆

一长期以来的法学学习给我以法官以这种印象，法官只是规则的适用者，在审判中应当保持中立，保证其客观性。法官在审判中不得存在任何偏私，而且须在外观上使任何正直的人不对其中立性有任何合理的怀疑。从而我们相信，法官在工...

评分☆☆☆☆☆

类似图书点击查看全场最低价

出版者:Harvard University Press

作者:Richard Posner

出品人:

页数:400

译者:

出版时间:2008-04-30

价格:USD 29.95

装帧:Hardcover

isbn号码:9780674028203

丛书系列:

图书标签: 法律法学英文经典美国制度

How Judges Think 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书图书描述

A distinguished and experienced appellate court judge, Richard A. Posner offers in this new book a unique and, to orthodox legal thinkers, a startling perspective on how judges and justices decide cases. When conventional legal materials enable judges to ascertain the true facts of a case and apply clear pre-existing legal rules to them, Posner argues, they do so straightforwardly; that is the domain of legalist reasoning. However, in non-routine cases, the conventional materials run out and judges are on their own, navigating uncharted seas with equipment consisting of experience, emotions, and often unconscious beliefs. In doing so, they take on a legislative role, though one that is confined by internal and external constraints, such as professional ethics, opinions of respected colleagues, and limitations imposed by other branches of government on freewheeling judicial discretion.Occasional legislators, judges are motivated by political considerations in a broad and sometimes a narrow sense of that term. In that open area, most American judges are legal pragmatists. Legal pragmatism is forward-looking and policy-based. It focuses on the consequences of a decision in both the short and the long term, rather than on its antecedent logic. Legal pragmatism so understood is really just a form of ordinary practical reasoning, rather than some special kind of legal reasoning.Supreme Court justices are uniquely free from the constraints on ordinary judges and uniquely tempted to engage in legislative forms of adjudication. More than any other court, the Supreme Court is best understood as a political court.

How Judges Think 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书

想要找书就要到本本书屋

onlinetoolsland.com

立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本页

你会得到大惊喜!!