Dangerous Games

出版者:Modern Library

作者:Margaret MacMillan

页数:208

出版时间:2009-7-7

价格:USD 22.00

装帧:Hardcover

isbn号码:9780679643586

具体描述

Margaret MacMillan, an acclaimed historian and “great storyteller” (The New York Review of Books), explores here the many ways in which history–its values and dangers–affects us all, including how it is used and abused. The New York Times bestselling author of Paris 1919 and Nixon and Mao reveals how a deeper engagement with history in our private lives and, more important, in the sphere of public debate can guide us to a richer, more enlightened existence, as individuals and nations. Alive with incident and figures both great and infamous, including Robespierre, Adolf Hitler, Winston Churchill, Mao Zedong, Karl Marx, Henry Kissinger, Bill Clinton, Tony Blair, and George W. Bush, Dangerous Games explores why it is important to treat history with care.

History is used to justify religious movements and political campaigns alike. The manipulation of history is increasingly pervasive in today’s world. Dictators may suppress history because it undermines their ideas, agendas, or claims to absolute authority. Nationalists may tell false, one-sided, or misleading stories about the past. Political leaders might mobilize their people by telling lies. Adolf Hitler, for instance, blamed the Jews for Germany’s humiliation at Versailles and its defeat in World War I. It is imperative that we have an understanding of the past and avoid the all-too-common traps in thinking to which many fall prey–as MacMillan skillfully illuminates. This brilliantly reasoned work will compel us to examine history anew, including our own understanding of it, and our own closely held beliefs.

用户评价

这本书，用一种近乎冷酷的笔触，描绘了一幅关于生存的残酷画卷。《Dangerous Games》并非是那种告诉你“坚持就是胜利”的励志故事，它更像是直接将你扔进熔炉，让你在烈火中淬炼。我被书中角色所处的境地深深震撼，他们每一次呼吸都充满了危险，每一次决定都可能将他们推向深渊。作者并没有回避血腥和暴力，但这些描写并非是为了制造感官刺激，而是为了真实地展现生命在极端压力下的脆弱和韧性。我常常为角色的命运感到揪心，为他们所经历的痛苦而感到压抑。但我同时也被他们身上那种不屈的意志所打动。即使面对绝望，他们也从未放弃过对生的渴望。这本书让我意识到，我们所生活的世界，并非总是阳光明媚，也存在着我们无法想象的黑暗。但正是这种黑暗，才更加凸显了光明的可贵。我开始反思，我们习以为常的安逸，是多么的来之不易。我开始更加珍惜生命，更加敬畏生活。这本书，与其说是一部小说，不如说是一种警醒，它让我们重新审视生命的意义，重新认识人类的极限。

《Dangerous Games》这本书，给我最大的感受就是一种深刻的沉浸感。一旦开始阅读，就仿佛被一股强大的吸力牢牢抓住，无法自拔。作者构建的世界，无论是场景的描绘，还是氛围的营造，都充满了令人窒息的真实感。我能够清晰地感受到空气中弥漫的紧张气息，能够听到远处传来的细微声响，甚至能够闻到角落里散发出的某种不安的味道。这种感官上的极致体验，让我在阅读过程中，仿佛也成为了故事的一部分。我不再是旁观者，而是身临其境地感受着角色的恐惧、希望与绝望。书中对于角色内心世界的刻画，更是入木三分。他们的每一次挣扎，每一次矛盾，都如同在我眼前上演一般。我能够理解他们的选择，即使是那些看起来极端或者错误的选择。因为我知道，在那个特殊的环境下，他们别无选择。作者并没有刻意去简化角色的心理，而是将人性的复杂和多面性展现得淋漓尽致。我常常在想，如果换做是我，我是否也能像他们一样坚强？我是否也能在绝境中找到活下去的勇气？这本书让我有机会去审视自己，去认识到自己内心深处的潜能和脆弱。每一次阅读，都像是一次深刻的心理探索，让我对人性有了更深的理解。

《Dangerous Games》这本书，说实话，一开始我以为会是一部轻松娱乐的作品，但它带来的震撼远超我的预期。我仿佛被作者用一种无形的力量拽入了一个黑暗的世界，在那里，规则被颠覆，人性被放大到极致。故事中的每一个人物都仿佛带着伤痕，他们被过去的阴影笼罩，又被眼前的困境所驱使，做出一些令人瞠目结舌的选择。我发现自己常常在阅读的时候，不自觉地将自己代入其中，去想象如果是我，我会如何应对。而每一次的设想，都让我更加深刻地体会到，在那种极端环境下，理性是多么脆弱，情感又是多么具有毁灭性。书中对于暴力和压力的描写，不是为了血腥而血腥，而是为了展现生命在崩塌边缘的脆弱。我看到了在绝望中滋生的希望，也看到了在希望中孕育的绝望。作者并没有给我们一个明确的答案，告诉我们什么是对，什么是错，而是将所有的可能性都呈现在我们面前，让我们自己去判断，去衡量。我常常为角色的命运感到担忧，为他们所承受的痛苦而心痛。但同时，我也被他们身上那种不屈不挠的精神所打动，即使身处绝境，也依然努力地寻找一线生机。这种挣扎的过程，真实得让人心悸。我开始思考，究竟是什么，才能让我们在黑暗中保持清醒？又是什么，让我们在绝望中坚持下去？这本书并没有提供简单的解药，它只是将问题抛给我们，让我们去思考，去寻找属于自己的答案。每一次阅读，都像是一次对自身认知的挑战，让我不得不去审视那些被我忽略的角落。

《Dangerous Games》这本书，给我带来的最深刻的感受，是一种强烈的代入感。作者的笔触，仿佛拥有魔力，能够将我轻易地带入故事之中，让我与角色一同呼吸，一同感受。我能够清晰地感受到角色的恐惧，他们的痛苦，以及他们在那艰难时刻所做出的每一个艰难的决定。我不再是一个旁观者，我仿佛成为了他们中的一员，与他们一同经历着这场惊心动魄的冒险。书中对于环境的描写，更是细腻入微，仿佛我能够身临其境地感受到空气中的寒意，听到远处传来的风声，甚至闻到泥土的芬芳。这种身临其境的感觉，让我在阅读过程中，获得了前所未有的沉浸式体验。我常常在阅读的时候，不由自主地屏住呼吸，仿佛自己也置身于那个危险的境地。这本书，让我有机会去审视自己，去认识到自己内心的恐惧和渴望。它没有提供简单的答案，它只是将问题抛给我们，让我们去思考，去感受，去面对。

《Dangerous Games》这本书，用一种极其冷静的笔触，探讨了人性的黑暗面。我被书中角色所处的极端困境深深吸引，他们每一次的挣扎，每一次的抉择，都充满了令人窒息的张力。作者并没有回避人性的丑陋和卑劣，他将这些赤裸裸地呈现在我们面前，让我们不得不去面对。我看到了在生存的压力下，道德是如何被践踏，人性是如何被扭曲。我看到了在绝望中滋生的疯狂，也看到了在希望中孕育的阴谋。这本书让我意识到，我们所生活的世界，并非总是充满阳光，也存在着我们无法想象的黑暗。但正是这种黑暗，才更加凸显了人性中微弱的光芒。我常常为角色的命运感到担忧，为他们所经历的痛苦而感到心痛。但我同时也被他们身上那种顽强的生命力所打动，即使身处绝境，也依然努力地寻找一线生机。这本书，与其说是一部小说，不如说是一种警示，它让我们重新审视人性的复杂，重新认识生命的脆弱。

我不得不说，《Dangerous Games》这本书，成功地将我推向了情绪的边缘。它不是那种能让你在咖啡馆里轻松阅读的作品，它需要你全神贯注，需要你做好随时被情绪冲击的准备。作者对人物心理的刻画，简直是达到了出神入化的地步。我能够清晰地感受到他们的恐惧，他们的愤怒，他们的绝望，甚至他们内心深处最隐秘的渴望。这些情绪，如同潮水般涌来，一次又一次地将我淹没。我看到了人性的脆弱，也看到了人性的坚韧。我看到了在极端环境下，道德的界限是如何模糊不清，生命的价格又是如何的轻如鸿毛。我常常在想，如果是我，我能否承受住如此巨大的压力？我能否在绝望中找到一丝希望？这本书让我有机会去审视自己，去认识到自己内心的恐惧和不安。它没有提供简单的答案，它只是将问题抛给我们，让我们去思考，去感受，去面对。阅读的过程，与其说是享受，不如说是一种洗礼，一种对心灵的深刻冲击。

《Dangerous Games》的阅读体验，可以说是一种心跳的冒险。从第一页开始，我就被带入了一个充满未知和危险的世界，每一次翻页都伴随着一种预感，一种期待，以及一种恐惧。作者的叙事方式非常有力量，他能够用最简洁的语言，勾勒出最复杂的情境，让读者在脑海中形成最生动的画面。我常常会在阅读的时候，不由自主地屏住呼吸，仿佛自己也置身于那个紧张的时刻。书中对于细节的捕捉，更是令人惊叹。一个眼神，一个手势，一段对话，都可能蕴含着深层的意义，都可能成为解开谜团的关键。我花费了大量的精力去分析这些细节，去推测角色的意图，去预测接下来的发展。然而，作者的构思总是能够出乎我的意料，他总能找到最巧妙的方式，将我引入他精心设计的迷宫。这种被玩弄于股掌之间的感觉，既让人感到一丝沮丧，又充满了智力上的乐趣。我享受这种不断挑战、不断突破自我的过程。这本书，不仅仅是一部小说，它更像是一场与作者的智慧较量，一场对自身洞察力的考验。

坦白说，《Dangerous Games》这本书的阅读体验，简直就像是一场智力上的极限挑战。作者的设计简直是天马行空，却又环环相扣，每一个细节都像是为最终的解谜铺垫。我花了大量的时间去梳理人物关系，去分析他们的动机，试图在纷繁的线索中找到那条唯一的真理。然而，每当我以为自己接近真相的时候，作者总能用一个意想不到的转折，将我彻底打入迷茫之中。这种被戏耍的感觉，虽然有时让人有些抓狂，但更多的是一种对作者智慧的敬佩。书中的谜团层层叠加，如同剥洋葱一般，每一次的揭开，都伴随着新的疑问。我常常在深夜里，捧着这本书，思绪万千，试图拼凑出全貌。我发现，作者并没有刻意去制造惊悚，而是通过对人性的深刻洞察，让悬念自然而然地滋生。那些看似平常的对话，背后可能隐藏着杀机；那些无意间的举动，可能预示着巨大的危机。我不得不承认，自己在这本书面前，显得有些稚嫩。但我依然乐此不疲，因为每一次的失败，都让我更加渴望去理解作者的构思，去挑战自己的思维极限。这本书不仅仅是情节的推进，更是一种思维的碰撞，一种智力的角逐。我享受这种被不断挑战、不断超越的感觉，这让我觉得自己也在这场游戏中，获得了成长。

我必须承认，《Dangerous Games》这本书，以其独特的魅力，成功地俘获了我。作者的叙事风格，如同一位高明的魔术师，总能在不经意间，变出令人惊叹的把戏。我沉醉于他构建的那个充满谜团的世界，每一次阅读，都像是在解开一个个精妙的锁扣。我喜欢那种被悬念所吸引，被情节所牵引的感觉。我喜欢那种在猜测与被推翻之间徘徊的刺激。我常常会在阅读的时候，不自觉地放慢速度，生怕错过任何一个细微的线索。我喜欢那种与作者斗智斗勇的感觉，那种想要看穿他心思的渴望。这本书，让我重新找回了阅读的乐趣，让我感受到了智力上的挑战和成就感。我享受这种被带入一个全新世界，去探索未知，去解开秘密的过程。它不仅仅是一部小说，它更像是一次思维的冒险，一次对自身想象力和逻辑能力的考验。

刚刚放下《Dangerous Games》，我的心情久久不能平静。这本书，与其说是一部小说，不如说是一场精心编织的迷局，每一次翻页都像是在刀尖上行走，心脏随着情节的跌宕起伏而剧烈跳动。作者的笔触如同手术刀般精准，将人性的复杂、道德的模糊以及生存的残酷淋漓尽致地呈现在读者面前。我从未读过如此令人着迷又倍感压抑的作品。故事开篇就设置了一个极具张力的悬念，让我迫不及待地想要一探究竟。随着角色的深入，我发现他们并非简单的善恶二元对立，而是充满了矛盾、挣扎和不为人知的过去。每一次看似微不足道的选择，都可能牵一发而动全身，将他们引向更深的泥沼。书中对细节的刻画可谓是登峰造极，无论是环境的描写，还是人物细微的表情和动作，都充满了暗示，仿佛在低语着即将到来的危机。我反复咀嚼着那些看似不经意的对话，试图从中找出隐藏的线索，但每一次自以为是的推测，都被作者巧妙地推翻。这种被玩弄于股掌之间的感觉，既令人沮丧，又充满了智力上的挑战。我感觉到自己仿佛也置身于那个危险的游戏之中，每一步都小心翼翼，生怕踏入陷阱。作者对叙事节奏的掌控也堪称一绝，时而急促如风，将人带入紧张的追逐；时而又舒缓下来，让我在喘息之际，感受角色的内心波澜。那些沉重的抉择，那些绝望的瞬间，都如潮水般涌来，将我淹没。我开始质疑自己对公平、正义的理解，也开始反思在极端压力下，人类会展现出怎样的本能。这本书不仅仅是关于一个故事，它更像是一面镜子，映照出我们内心深处的恐惧和欲望，也迫使我们面对那些我们可能一直试图回避的真相。阅读的过程，与其说是享受，不如说是一次深刻的自我审视。

确实不该给随便看看的一般读者上史学理论（即便有良好的文笔与相对为读者所熟悉的案例作为支撑），作者很容易跳进自以为发觉并成功避开的陷阱

A lucidly written argument about the dangers of manipulating history for present (mainly political) interests, MacMillan's book is good enough as a public-oriented work. Yet none of her arguments (re-packaging, for instance, decades-old arguments about "imagined communities" and "invented traditions") are very original and her bias for "political history" over social or cultural studies leaves an impression that the abuse of history occurs mostly at the hands of political leaders and parties, nation-states, and interest groups. Furthermore, even some of her rightful condemnations seem rather simplistic. Just one example: the only people who seem to abuse history and take on a stance of victimhood in China, in MacMillan's story, are the CCP (with quips from Zhou and Deng as evidence). But why does reconstructed nationalistic claims resonate with the public? Why do elites and subalterns often buy into the same version of victimhood? Notes here and there about her unfamiliarity with certain historiographies and debates and a more detailed list of suggested readings would help public readers. When the international historian reaches for breadth at the cost of depth, she should readily acknowledge her own use and abuse (however unintentional) of histories.

A lucidly written argument about the dangers of manipulating history for present (mainly political) interests, MacMillan's book is good enough as a public-oriented work. Yet none of her arguments (re-packaging, for instance, decades-old arguments about "imagined communities" and "invented traditions") are very original and her bias for "political history" over social or cultural studies leaves an impression that the abuse of history occurs mostly at the hands of political leaders and parties, nation-states, and interest groups. Furthermore, even some of her rightful condemnations seem rather simplistic. Just one example: the only people who seem to abuse history and take on a stance of victimhood in China, in MacMillan's story, are the CCP (with quips from Zhou and Deng as evidence). But why does reconstructed nationalistic claims resonate with the public? Why do elites and subalterns often buy into the same version of victimhood? Notes here and there about her unfamiliarity with certain historiographies and debates and a more detailed list of suggested readings would help public readers. When the international historian reaches for breadth at the cost of depth, she should readily acknowledge her own use and abuse (however unintentional) of histories.

A lucidly written argument about the dangers of manipulating history for present (mainly political) interests, MacMillan's book is good enough as a public-oriented work. Yet none of her arguments (re-packaging, for instance, decades-old arguments about "imagined communities" and "invented traditions") are very original and her bias for "political history" over social or cultural studies leaves an impression that the abuse of history occurs mostly at the hands of political leaders and parties, nation-states, and interest groups. Furthermore, even some of her rightful condemnations seem rather simplistic. Just one example: the only people who seem to abuse history and take on a stance of victimhood in China, in MacMillan's story, are the CCP (with quips from Zhou and Deng as evidence). But why does reconstructed nationalistic claims resonate with the public? Why do elites and subalterns often buy into the same version of victimhood? Notes here and there about her unfamiliarity with certain historiographies and debates and a more detailed list of suggested readings would help public readers. When the international historian reaches for breadth at the cost of depth, she should readily acknowledge her own use and abuse (however unintentional) of histories.

A lucidly written argument about the dangers of manipulating history for present (mainly political) interests, MacMillan's book is good enough as a public-oriented work. Yet none of her arguments (re-packaging, for instance, decades-old arguments about "imagined communities" and "invented traditions") are very original and her bias for "political history" over social or cultural studies leaves an impression that the abuse of history occurs mostly at the hands of political leaders and parties, nation-states, and interest groups. Furthermore, even some of her rightful condemnations seem rather simplistic. Just one example: the only people who seem to abuse history and take on a stance of victimhood in China, in MacMillan's story, are the CCP (with quips from Zhou and Deng as evidence). But why does reconstructed nationalistic claims resonate with the public? Why do elites and subalterns often buy into the same version of victimhood? Notes here and there about her unfamiliarity with certain historiographies and debates and a more detailed list of suggested readings would help public readers. When the international historian reaches for breadth at the cost of depth, she should readily acknowledge her own use and abuse (however unintentional) of histories.