☆☆☆☆☆
简体网页||繁体网页

Dangerous Games 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书 著者简介

---

Dangerous Games 电子书 图书目录

---

点击这里下载

---

---

---

发表于2024-07-06

Dangerous Games 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书

Dangerous Games 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书

Dangerous Games 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书

---

喜欢 Dangerous Games 电子书 的读者还喜欢

• 
  Remaking the Chinese Empire 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书
• 
  Qing Travelers to the Far West 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书
• 
  Uyghur Nation 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书
• 
  国家精英 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书
• 
  譯者與学者 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书
• 
  民国的“失传” 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书
• 
  历史学十二讲（增订本） 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书
• 
  “贼”“民”之间 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书
• 
  史家、史学与现代学术 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书
• 
  生活的逻辑 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书

评分☆☆☆☆☆

评分☆☆☆☆☆

评分☆☆☆☆☆

评分☆☆☆☆☆

评分☆☆☆☆☆

类似图书 点击查看全场最低价

出版者:Modern Library

作者:Margaret MacMillan

出品人:

页数:208

译者:

出版时间:2009-7-7

价格:USD 22.00

装帧:Hardcover

isbn号码:9780679643586

丛书系列:

Dangerous Games 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书

评分☆☆☆☆☆

A lucidly written argument about the dangers of manipulating history for present (mainly political) interests, MacMillan's book is good enough as a public-oriented work. Yet none of her arguments (re-packaging, for instance, decades-old arguments about "imagined communities" and "invented traditions") are very original and her bias for "political history" over social or cultural studies leaves an impression that the abuse of history occurs mostly at the hands of political leaders and parties, nation-states, and interest groups. Furthermore, even some of her rightful condemnations seem rather simplistic. Just one example: the only people who seem to abuse history and take on a stance of victimhood in China, in MacMillan's story, are the CCP (with quips from Zhou and Deng as evidence). But why does reconstructed nationalistic claims resonate with the public? Why do elites and subalterns often buy into the same version of victimhood? Notes here and there about her unfamiliarity with certain historiographies and debates and a more detailed list of suggested readings would help public readers. When the international historian reaches for breadth at the cost of depth, she should readily acknowledge her own use and abuse (however unintentional) of histories.

评分☆☆☆☆☆

确实不该给随便看看的一般读者上史学理论（即便有良好的文笔与相对为读者所熟悉的案例作为支撑），作者很容易跳进自以为发觉并成功避开的陷阱

评分☆☆☆☆☆

A lucidly written argument about the dangers of manipulating history for present (mainly political) interests, MacMillan's book is good enough as a public-oriented work. Yet none of her arguments (re-packaging, for instance, decades-old arguments about "imagined communities" and "invented traditions") are very original and her bias for "political history" over social or cultural studies leaves an impression that the abuse of history occurs mostly at the hands of political leaders and parties, nation-states, and interest groups. Furthermore, even some of her rightful condemnations seem rather simplistic. Just one example: the only people who seem to abuse history and take on a stance of victimhood in China, in MacMillan's story, are the CCP (with quips from Zhou and Deng as evidence). But why does reconstructed nationalistic claims resonate with the public? Why do elites and subalterns often buy into the same version of victimhood? Notes here and there about her unfamiliarity with certain historiographies and debates and a more detailed list of suggested readings would help public readers. When the international historian reaches for breadth at the cost of depth, she should readily acknowledge her own use and abuse (however unintentional) of histories.

评分☆☆☆☆☆

A lucidly written argument about the dangers of manipulating history for present (mainly political) interests, MacMillan's book is good enough as a public-oriented work. Yet none of her arguments (re-packaging, for instance, decades-old arguments about "imagined communities" and "invented traditions") are very original and her bias for "political history" over social or cultural studies leaves an impression that the abuse of history occurs mostly at the hands of political leaders and parties, nation-states, and interest groups. Furthermore, even some of her rightful condemnations seem rather simplistic. Just one example: the only people who seem to abuse history and take on a stance of victimhood in China, in MacMillan's story, are the CCP (with quips from Zhou and Deng as evidence). But why does reconstructed nationalistic claims resonate with the public? Why do elites and subalterns often buy into the same version of victimhood? Notes here and there about her unfamiliarity with certain historiographies and debates and a more detailed list of suggested readings would help public readers. When the international historian reaches for breadth at the cost of depth, she should readily acknowledge her own use and abuse (however unintentional) of histories.

评分☆☆☆☆☆

确实不该给随便看看的一般读者上史学理论（即便有良好的文笔与相对为读者所熟悉的案例作为支撑），作者很容易跳进自以为发觉并成功避开的陷阱

查看全网最低价