This classic collection of essays, first published in 1968, represents H.L.A. Hart's landmark contribution to the philosophy of criminal responsibility and punishment. Unavailable for ten years, this new edition reproduces the original text, adding a new critical introduction by John Gardner, a leading contemporary criminal law theorist, discussing the continued influence of Hart's work on penal policy and the philosophy of criminal justice.
发表于2025-04-17
Punishment and Responsibility 2025 pdf epub mobi 电子书
图书标签: 法哲学 法律 哲学 刑哲 Responsibility Hart 论文集 法哲
This classic collection of essays, first published in 1968, has had an enduring impact on academic and public debates about criminal responsibility and criminal punishment. Forty years on, its arguments are as powerful as ever. H.L.A. Hart offers an alternative to retributive thinking about criminal punishment that nevertheless preserves the central distinction between guilt and innocence. He also provides an account of criminal responsibility that links the distinction between guilt and innocence closely to the ideal of the rule of law, and thereby attempts to by-pass unnerving debates about free will and determinism. Always engaged with live issues of law and public policy, Hart makes difficult philosophical puzzles accessible and immediate to a wide range of readers. For this new edition, otherwise a reproduction of the original, John Gardner adds an introduction engaging critically with Hart's arguments, and explaining the continuing importance of Hart's ideas in spite of the intervening revival of retributive thinking in both academic and policy circles.Unavailable for ten years, the new edition of Punishment and Responsibility makes available again the central text in the field for a new generation of academics, students and professionals engaged in criminal justice and penal policy.
一如既往地清晰。在Hart看来,犯罪与刑罚是目的不同的两件事,本文集的理论难题在于刑罚。首先将刑罚的证成区分为普遍正当目的和分配两个面向,澄清混淆。以此为框架,主张分配面向具有独立次级价值(secondary value),即刑罚在强制性法律框架之中最大化个体自由,构成对普遍正当目的的限制。进而,重新解释犯罪意图理论和以其为基础的责任理论:犯罪意图并不只在报应论中才有意义,刑事责任也并不依赖于道德责任……越到后面,Hart需要反复澄清和构建的责任问题越难读。
评分一如既往地清晰。在Hart看来,犯罪与刑罚是目的不同的两件事,本文集的理论难题在于刑罚。首先将刑罚的证成区分为普遍正当目的和分配两个面向,澄清混淆。以此为框架,主张分配面向具有独立次级价值(secondary value),即刑罚在强制性法律框架之中最大化个体自由,构成对普遍正当目的的限制。进而,重新解释犯罪意图理论和以其为基础的责任理论:犯罪意图并不只在报应论中才有意义,刑事责任也并不依赖于道德责任……越到后面,Hart需要反复澄清和构建的责任问题越难读。
评分一如既往地清晰。在Hart看来,犯罪与刑罚是目的不同的两件事,本文集的理论难题在于刑罚。首先将刑罚的证成区分为普遍正当目的和分配两个面向,澄清混淆。以此为框架,主张分配面向具有独立次级价值(secondary value),即刑罚在强制性法律框架之中最大化个体自由,构成对普遍正当目的的限制。进而,重新解释犯罪意图理论和以其为基础的责任理论:犯罪意图并不只在报应论中才有意义,刑事责任也并不依赖于道德责任……越到后面,Hart需要反复澄清和构建的责任问题越难读。
评分一如既往地清晰。在Hart看来,犯罪与刑罚是目的不同的两件事,本文集的理论难题在于刑罚。首先将刑罚的证成区分为普遍正当目的和分配两个面向,澄清混淆。以此为框架,主张分配面向具有独立次级价值(secondary value),即刑罚在强制性法律框架之中最大化个体自由,构成对普遍正当目的的限制。进而,重新解释犯罪意图理论和以其为基础的责任理论:犯罪意图并不只在报应论中才有意义,刑事责任也并不依赖于道德责任……越到后面,Hart需要反复澄清和构建的责任问题越难读。
评分一如既往地清晰。在Hart看来,犯罪与刑罚是目的不同的两件事,本文集的理论难题在于刑罚。首先将刑罚的证成区分为普遍正当目的和分配两个面向,澄清混淆。以此为框架,主张分配面向具有独立次级价值(secondary value),即刑罚在强制性法律框架之中最大化个体自由,构成对普遍正当目的的限制。进而,重新解释犯罪意图理论和以其为基础的责任理论:犯罪意图并不只在报应论中才有意义,刑事责任也并不依赖于道德责任……越到后面,Hart需要反复澄清和构建的责任问题越难读。
Punishment and Responsibility 2025 pdf epub mobi 电子书