Making Social Sciences More Scientific

出版者:OUP Oxford

作者:Rein Taagepera

页数:272

出版时间:2008-9-1

价格:GBP 78.00

装帧:Hardcover

isbn号码:9780199534661

具体描述

In his challenging new book Rein Taagepera argues that society needs more from social sciences than they have delivered. One reason for falling short is that social sciences have depended excessively on regression and other statistical approaches, neglecting logical model building. Science is not only about the empirical 'What is?' but also very much about the conceptual 'How should it be on logical grounds?' Statistical approaches are essentially descriptive, while quantitatively formulated logical models are predictive in an explanatory way. Why Social Sciences Are Not Scientific Enough contrasts the predominance of statistics in today's social sciences and predominance of quantitatively predictive logical models in physics. It shows how to construct predictive models and gives social science examples. Why Social Sciences Are Not Scientific Enough is useful to students who wish to learn the basics of the scientific method and to all those researchers who look for ways to do better social science.

作者简介

Rein Taagepera has B.A.Sc. in engineering physics plus M.A. in physics from University of Toronto and Ph.D. in solid state physics plus M.A. in international relations from University of Delaware. After 6 years of industrial research at DuPont Co., he has taught political science at University of California, Irvine since 1970 and also at University of Tartu, Estonia since 1992. He ran third in Estonia's presidential elections 1992, and was in 2001 the founding chair of a political party that later won the elections. He has over 100 research articles in electoral studies, comparative politics, Baltic area studies, Finno-Ugric linguistics, and physics. His books include Seats and Votes (with Matthew Shugart), The Baltic States: Years of Dependence 1940-1990 (with Romuald Misiunas), The Finno-Ugric Republics and the Russian State, and and Predicting Party Sizes (Oxford University Press).

目录信息

Preface
R Duncan Luce: Foreword
Part I. The Limitations of Descriptive Methodology
1: Why Social Sciences Are Not Scientific Enough
2: Can Social Science Approaches Find the Law of Gravitation?
3: How to Construct Predictive Models: Simplicity and Non-Absurdity
4: Example of Model Building: Electoral Volatility
5: Physicists Multiply, Social Scientists Add―Even when It Doesn't Add up
6: All Hypotheses Are Not Created Equal
7: Why Most Numbers Published in Social Sciences Are Dead on Arrival
Part II. Quantitatively Predictive Logical Models
8: Forbidden Areas and Anchor Points
9: Geometric Means and Lognormal Distributions
10: Example of Interlocking Models: Party Sizes and Cabinet Duration
11: Beyond Constraint-Based Models: Communication Channels and Growth Rates
12: Why We Should Shift to Symmetric Regression
13: All Indices Are Not Created Equal
Part III. Synthesis of Predictive and Descriptive Approaches
14: From Descriptive to Predictive Approaches
15: Recommendations for Better Regression
16: Converting from Descriptive Analysis to Predictive Models
17: Are Electoral Studies a Rosetta Stone for Parts of Social Sciences?
18: Beyond Regression: The Need for Predictive Models
References
Index
· · · · · · (收起)

用户评价

在作者所界定的“社会科学”的意义上，这是一本很有见地、非常有新意、会影响到很多人饭碗，以致于影响力不会太大的书。

看了整一周，在作者所界定的“社会科学”的意义上，这是一本很有见地、非常有新意、会影响到很多人饭碗，以致于影响力不会太大的书。

从豆友处看到条目。谢谢豆友～浏览了一部分，跳读了一部分。作者讨论时可能忽略了部分领域，不过这倒不算什么问题。我十分赞成第一部分大方向的论述。但之后部分的具体方法示例有点一言难尽。就让我多少保留一下意见好了。

从豆友处看到条目。谢谢豆友～浏览了一部分，跳读了一部分。作者讨论时可能忽略了部分领域，不过这倒不算什么问题。我十分赞成第一部分大方向的论述。但之后部分的具体方法示例有点一言难尽。就让我多少保留一下意见好了。

看了整一周，在作者所界定的“社会科学”的意义上，这是一本很有见地、非常有新意、会影响到很多人饭碗，以致于影响力不会太大的书。