Christine M. Korsgaard is one of today's leading moral philosophers: this volume collects ten influential papers by her on practical reason and moral psychology. Korsgaard draws on the work of important figures in the history of philosophy such as Plato, Aristotle, Kant, and Hume, showing how their ideas can inform the solution of contemporary and traditional philosophical problems, such as the foundations of morality and practical reason, the nature of agency, and the role of the emotions in action. In Part 1, The Principles of Practical Reason , Korsgaard defends the view that the principles of practical reason are constitutive principles of action. By governing our actions in accordance with Kant's categorical imperative and the principle of instrumental reason, she argues, we take control of our own movements and so render ourselves active, self-determining beings.She criticizes rival attempts to give a normative foundation to the principles of practical reason, challenges the claims of the principle of maximizing one's own interests to be a rational principle, and argues for some deep continuities between Plato's account of the connection between justice and agency and Kant's account of the connection between autonomy and agency. In Part II, Moral Virtue and Moral Psychology , Korsgaard takes up the question of the role of our more passive or receptive faculties - our emotions and responses - in constituting our agency. She sketches a reading of the Nicomachean Ethics , based on the idea that our emotions can serve as perceptions of good and evil, and argues that this view of the emotions is at the root of the apparent differences between Aristotle and Kant's accounts of morality. She argues that in fact, Aristotle and Kant share a distinctive view about the locus of moral value and the nature of human choice that, among other things, gives them account of what it means to act rationally that is superior to other accounts.In Part III, Other Reflections , Korsgaard takes up question how we come to view one another as moral agents in Hume's philosophy. She examines the possible clash between the agency of the state and that of the individual that led to Kant's paradoxical views about revolution. And finally, she discusses her methodology in an account of what it means to be a constructivist moral philosopher. The essays are united by an introduction in which Korsgaard explains their connections to each other and to her current work.
發表於2024-11-07
The Constitution of Agency 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
圖書標籤: 倫理學 Korsgaard 政治哲學 哲學 心理學 分析哲學 reason practical-identity
為什麼我讀第二章討論討論亞裏士多德目的論的部分,總是讀齣濃厚的理學味道?
評分為什麼我讀第二章討論討論亞裏士多德目的論的部分,總是讀齣濃厚的理學味道?
評分第一部分:休謨區分冷靜的激情與冷靜的理性的運作,等同個人真實願望與個人總體善/目的是自然主義謬誤,重視[日常]心理學語言的規範性用法,休謨不行,要像康德區分desire/volition,理性事關意誌遵從獨立於意誌的理由,做人就要行動要走就得先邁腳於是工具原則是意誌的構成性規範,理性以立法形式決定按傾嚮行動否,事物未達其內在標準是為defective,推及理想國中對城邦德性的理解;第二:亞裏士多德形式/質料本體論+目的論+作為完美靈魂之德性瞭解一下,與康德區彆於心理學層麵,reason是有意識於自己動機的恰切性,action具身化其reason;第三:…注意休謨理論中一般視角、愛、人的規範性意蘊(!),倫理學的非-/認知主義區分不行 。較直接關注核心問題、略多依賴經典、清晰易懂但可能不討巧
評分第一部分:休謨區分冷靜的激情與冷靜的理性的運作,等同個人真實願望與個人總體善/目的是自然主義謬誤,重視[日常]心理學語言的規範性用法,休謨不行,要像康德區分desire/volition,理性事關意誌遵從獨立於意誌的理由,做人就要行動要走就得先邁腳於是工具原則是意誌的構成性規範,理性以立法形式決定按傾嚮行動否,事物未達其內在標準是為defective,推及理想國中對城邦德性的理解;第二:亞裏士多德形式/質料本體論+目的論+作為完美靈魂之德性瞭解一下,與康德區彆於心理學層麵,reason是有意識於自己動機的恰切性,action具身化其reason;第三:…注意休謨理論中一般視角、愛、人的規範性意蘊(!),倫理學的非-/認知主義區分不行 。較直接關注核心問題、略多依賴經典、清晰易懂但可能不討巧
評分為什麼我讀第二章討論討論亞裏士多德目的論的部分,總是讀齣濃厚的理學味道?
The Constitution of Agency 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載