Paul A. Cohen is Wasserman Professor of Asian Studies and History Emeritus at Wellesley College and an associate at the Fairbank Center for Chinese Studies, Harvard University. His most recent book is Speaking to History: The Story of King Goujian in Twentieth-Century China.
发表于2024-12-22
Discovering History in China 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书
中国中心观的由来及其发展 ----柯文教授访谈录 * 周 武 李德英 戴东阳 * 本次访谈得到林同奇教授(《在中国发现历史》中文本译者)许多具体的帮助,访谈录整理稿经柯文教授审阅和订正,在此一并致谢! 〔提要〕柯文教授是美国著名的中国学家,曾任威尔斯利学院历史系主任、教授...
评分“他们无法表述自己;他们必须被别人表述。”作为一个中国人读了一个美国历史学家写得《在中国发现历史——中国中心观在美国的兴起》,上面那句话最先蹦入我的脑海中。这句话出自马克思的《路易波拿巴的雾月十八》,萨义德将其引用,放在自己《东方学》一书的开头。马克思似乎...
评分“不是历史学家的人有时以为历史就是过去的事实。可是历史学家应该知道并非如此。当然事实俱在。但它们数量无穷,照例沉默不语,即使一旦开口又往往互相矛盾,甚至无法理解……选择什么事实,赋予这些事实以什么含义,在很大程度上取决于我们提出的是什么问题,和我们进行研究...
评分柯文的《在中国发现历史》一书,在中国近代史研究领域中刮起了范式革命的旋风,柯文在其书中批判了在美国学界研究中国近代史比较流行的几种范式,其中主要的有:冲击——回应模式、传统——现代模式以及帝国主义模式,这几种模式的主要缺陷在于容易使中国近代史的研究陷入西方...
评分“他们无法表述自己;他们必须被别人表述。”作为一个中国人读了一个美国历史学家写得《在中国发现历史——中国中心观在美国的兴起》,上面那句话最先蹦入我的脑海中。这句话出自马克思的《路易波拿巴的雾月十八》,萨义德将其引用,放在自己《东方学》一书的开头。马克思似乎...
图书标签: 海外中国研究 历史 政治 中国近现代史 柯文 中国近代史 history Paul_Cohen
Since its first publication, Paul A. Cohen's Discovering History in China has occupied a singular place in American China scholarship. Translated into three East Asian languages, the volume has become essential to the study of China from the early nineteenth century to today.
Cohen critiques the work of leading postwar scholars and is especially adamant about not reading China through the lens of Western history. To this end, he uncovers the strong ethnocentric bias pervading the three major conceptual frameworks of American scholarship of the 1950s and 1960s: the impact-response, modernization, and imperialism approaches. In place of these, Cohen favors a "China-centered" approach in which historians understand Chinese history on its own terms, paying close attention to Chinese historical trajectories and Chinese perceptions of their problems, rather than a set of expectations derived from Western history. In an important new introduction, Cohen reflects on his fifty-year career as a historian of China and discusses major recent trends in the field. Although some of these developments challenge a narrowly conceived China-centered approach, insofar as they enable more balanced comparisons between China and the West and recast the Chinese and their history in more human, less exotic terms, they powerfully affirm the central thrust of Cohen's work.
I am not authorized to comment on this "favorite of nervous doctoral candidates on the eve of their oral exams" anyway...
评分作者自己也承认完全批判西方视角太过偏激。实际上我觉得他自我批判得还不够,西方视角哪仅仅是“另一视角,”所谓的中国本土视角有吗?除了马克思那一套西方的,本土是没有所谓史观的,大多都在堆砌材料。中国传统的史学,无非帝王将相,品评人物,叹叹兴亡。以今天本土史家的刻苦程度和视野范围,追赶西方学者还来不及,哪里轮的上真正形成中国自己的史学流派。
评分作者自己也承认完全批判西方视角太过偏激。实际上我觉得他自我批判得还不够,西方视角哪仅仅是“另一视角,”所谓的中国本土视角有吗?除了马克思那一套西方的,本土是没有所谓史观的,大多都在堆砌材料。中国传统的史学,无非帝王将相,品评人物,叹叹兴亡。以今天本土史家的刻苦程度和视野范围,追赶西方学者还来不及,哪里轮的上真正形成中国自己的史学流派。
评分I am not authorized to comment on this "favorite of nervous doctoral candidates on the eve of their oral exams" anyway...
评分I am not authorized to comment on this "favorite of nervous doctoral candidates on the eve of their oral exams" anyway...
Discovering History in China 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书