Elizabeth Perry is Henry Rosovsky Professor of Government at Harvard University and Director of the Harvard-Yenching Institute. She is the author of many books, most recently: Mao's Invisible Hand: The Political Foundations of Adaptive Governance in China and Patrolling the Revolution: Worker Militias, Citizenship and the Modern Chinese State.
发表于2025-02-02
Anyuan 2025 pdf epub mobi 电子书
这是一本典型的问题主导的研究。裴老师的问题就是“为什么中共当年能够扇乎那么多人死心塌地的闹革命。” 先生从文化入手,基本论断是culture/ideology localization。 但是无意之中,还有另一层恐怕也更加重要。李立三能把工人俱乐部搞起来,刘少奇能接着把它变成小莫斯科,核...
评分 评分- 初碰到這本書時, 差不多被它的封面與設計差嚇跑了。港大出版社的書, 講真應該做好一點設計. 牛津比它好很多, 中大近年也不錯. - 回到這本書的話, 我覺得非常好看. 由於對國內學術圈不熟悉, 在找關於近代中國史的書本時我總是不大敢找內地出版的書籍, 不知道哪些題目內地是可...
评分这是一本典型的问题主导的研究。裴老师的问题就是“为什么中共当年能够扇乎那么多人死心塌地的闹革命。” 先生从文化入手,基本论断是culture/ideology localization。 但是无意之中,还有另一层恐怕也更加重要。李立三能把工人俱乐部搞起来,刘少奇能接着把它变成小莫斯科,核...
图书标签: 海外中国研究 裴宜理 中国革命 社会运动 毛泽东 历史 政治学 安源
How do we explain the surprising trajectory of the Chinese Communist revolution? Why has it taken such a different route from its Russian prototype? An answer, Elizabeth Perry suggests, lies in the Chinese Communists' creative development and deployment of cultural resources - during their revolutionary rise to power and afterwards. Skillful "cultural positioning" and "cultural patronage," on the part of Mao Zedong, his comrades and successors, helped to construct a polity in which a once alien Communist system came to be accepted as familiarly "Chinese." Perry traces this process through a case study of the Anyuan coal mine, a place where Mao and other early leaders of the Chinese Communist Party mobilized an influential labor movement at the beginning of their revolution, and whose history later became a touchstone of "political correctness" in the People's Republic of China. Once known as "China's Little Moscow," Anyuan came over time to symbolize a distinctively Chinese revolutionary tradition. Yet the meanings of that tradition remain highly contested, as contemporary Chinese debate their revolutionary past in search of a new political future.
以安源为线索,基于对安源“革命传统”的建构与叙述,梳理出cultural positioning和cultural patronage两条思路——在cultural positioning中借用宗教、仪式等符号资源获取普通人对革命authority的接纳,在cultural patronage的宣传中“塑造”符合政治需要的革命传统。安源工人在罢工、纪念日、音乐、“化妆讲演”中走向革命,走向mobilization,“made crucial contributions in both military and political terms”,最后不过是给新政体提供reconstruct革命传统的素材罢了。
评分revolution
评分用安源透视从革命到改革的各种问题,风格(竟然)颇似史景迁。虽然作者意图的核心,即CCP的cultural positioning,或宣传策略与文化传统的配合与张力这一点上结论并不十分新颖,但有趣的历史发掘,无论是李立三与安源地方精英的妥协和博弈,还是建国后宣传工作中对历史的重构,仍给人启发。本书的创作虽出于作者研究兴趣的文化转向,并把大半篇幅用来谈论克里姆林学的斗争,但仍保留了前作对工人阶级命运的关注。从前者出发,这是持续不断你争我夺的cultural governance;而从后者的角度出发,这大概是“兴百姓苦亡百姓苦”的一个故事。
评分运用Cultural positioning与Cultural patronage来构建安源煤矿历史变迁,梳理细致,两个概念由于外延太广,自然都能恰到好处的运用到讨论各阶段对安源的动员/宣传/服务政治上面。但裴宜理对“既有文化资源”的界定,实在过于模糊:既包括了作为文化本身的民间秘密会社传统,又涵盖了作为文化载体的各类表现形式,但到了最后结论部分,又从列文森切入,试图再理解儒家与共产主义。具备启发性,但或许并没有达到裴所预期的成果。
评分讲的是中共领导人在革命起始阶段如何运用所谓的“传统”来让安源工人死心塌地地跟着革命。比如跟青帮头子联合,用三字经教学并注入”人性尊严”的论断,运用宗教仪式,强调领导人的神力以及魅力等等。这种地方化的手段让中共迅速获得了工人的支持。只是当革命已经渐入佳境或者完成任务。安源工人便被抛弃了。
Anyuan 2025 pdf epub mobi 电子书