Daniel Stedman Jones is a barrister in London. He was educated at the University of Oxford and at the University of Pennsylvania, where he earned a PhD in history. He has worked as a policy adviser for the New Opportunities Fund and as a researcher for Demos.
How did American and British policymakers become so enamored with free markets, deregulation, and limited government? This book--the first comprehensive transatlantic history of the rise of neoliberal politics--presents a surprising answer. Based on archival research and interviews with leading participants in the movement, Masters of the Universe traces the ascendancy of neoliberalism from the academy of interwar Europe to supremacy under Reagan and Thatcher and in the decades since. Daniel Stedman Jones argues that there was nothing inevitable about the victory of free-market politics. Far from being the story of the simple triumph of right-wing ideas, the neoliberal breakthrough was contingent on the economic crises of the 1970s and the acceptance of the need for new policies by the political left.
Masters of the Universe describes neoliberalism's road to power, beginning in interwar Europe but shifting its center of gravity after 1945 to the United States, especially to Chicago and Virginia, where it acquired a simple clarity that was developed into an uncompromising political message. Neoliberalism was communicated through a transatlantic network of think tanks, businessmen, politicians, and journalists that was held together by Friedrich Hayek and Milton Friedman. After the collapse of Bretton Woods in 1971, and the "stagflation" that followed, their ideas finally began to take hold as Keynesianism appeared to self-destruct. Later, after the elections of Reagan and Thatcher, a guileless faith in free markets came to dominate politics.
Fascinating, important, and timely, this is a book for anyone who wants to understand the history behind the Anglo-American love affair with the free market, as well as the origins of the current economic crisis.
Review:
"[I]ntelligent."--Kenneth Minogue, Wall Street Journal
"In impressive fashion, Jones analyzes the impact of free market economics and deregulation on political leaders in Washington, D.C., and London since the 1970s. . . . [A]nyone intrigued by the intersection of economic theory and political affairs will appreciate this learned, detailed book."--Publishers Weekly
"A cerebral, pertinent exegesis on the thinking behind the rise of the New Right. . . . [A] valuable study that helps flesh out the caricature of conservatives as only believing 'greed is good.'"--Kirkus Reviews
"[I]mportant. . . . [A] beguilingly erudite old-fashioned read."--Stephen Matchett, Australian
"Stedman Jones . . . describes the scene with remarkable accuracy, including its financial underpinning and its ties with conservatism."--Karen Horn, Standpoint
"Mr. Stedman Jones offers a novel and comprehensive history of neoliberalism. It is tarred neither by a reverence for the heroes, nor by caricature, for he is a fair and nuanced writer. This is a bold biography of a great idea."--Economist
"[A] lucid, richly detailed examination of the evolution of the free market ideology since the end of World War II."--Glenn C. Altschuler, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
"[A] good read. . . . The deep history of neo-liberal thought is fascinating."--Andrew Hilton, Financial World
Endorsement:
"Daniel Stedman Jones has an unusual talent--making the history of economic thought fascinating and significant. In tracing the evolution of neoliberal ideas and their implementation in public policy in Britain and the United States, he does a superb job of helping us understand both the last half-century of Atlantic history and the origins of the current crisis. No book could be more timely."--Eric Foner, Columbia University
發表於2024-11-18
Masters of the Universe 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
這是怎麼迴事?在20世紀70年代初期,西方政府、學術界、媒體理解國傢和市場間的關係,靠的是自第二次世界大戰結束以來達成的同一個自由共識。在通常被稱為“資本主義黃金時代”的時期,政府、資本和勞動者達成瞭令人不安的共識,即放任市場自由運行會破壞社會。國傢要減少不平...
評分隻是些片段的摘抄 1、Karl Popper,集體主義比個人主義要好。 2、Ludwig von Mises認為沒有一個機構能控製好自己,no bureaucracy had the means to restrain itself,說的挺好的。 3、Friedrich Hayek認為中央計劃分配是不肯能的事情,因為沒有一個人聰明到知道彆人需求什麼。...
評分這是怎麼迴事?在20世紀70年代初期,西方政府、學術界、媒體理解國傢和市場間的關係,靠的是自第二次世界大戰結束以來達成的同一個自由共識。在通常被稱為“資本主義黃金時代”的時期,政府、資本和勞動者達成瞭令人不安的共識,即放任市場自由運行會破壞社會。國傢要減少不平...
評分隻是些片段的摘抄 1、Karl Popper,集體主義比個人主義要好。 2、Ludwig von Mises認為沒有一個機構能控製好自己,no bureaucracy had the means to restrain itself,說的挺好的。 3、Friedrich Hayek認為中央計劃分配是不肯能的事情,因為沒有一個人聰明到知道彆人需求什麼。...
評分隻是些片段的摘抄 1、Karl Popper,集體主義比個人主義要好。 2、Ludwig von Mises認為沒有一個機構能控製好自己,no bureaucracy had the means to restrain itself,說的挺好的。 3、Friedrich Hayek認為中央計劃分配是不肯能的事情,因為沒有一個人聰明到知道彆人需求什麼。...
圖書標籤: 新自由主義 經濟學 金融 經科 經濟思想史 社會學 neoliberalism Sociology
所有敘述新自由主義的書中,也許這一本是最靠譜的。
評分very helpful introductory work.
評分所有敘述新自由主義的書中,也許這一本是最靠譜的。
評分所有敘述新自由主義的書中,也許這一本是最靠譜的。
評分very helpful introductory work.
Masters of the Universe 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載