托马斯·内格尔(Thomas Nagel),纽约大学哲学与法学教授、美国人文科学院院士和不列颠学院院士,是当代西方哲学界政治哲学、伦理学和心灵哲学领城内的领军人物。著有The Possibility of Altruism, The View from Nowhere等一系列深入浅出的哲学读本,影响深远。
发表于2024-12-22
Mind and Cosmos 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书
“异端——托马斯·内格尔是谁?为什么这么多学术同行指责他?” 附原文链接: https://www.douban.com/group/topic/37504420/ 先看了链接文章。 这篇文章描述了那场针对内格尔新书的来自“学界的愤怒”,文章作者其实在学术态度上是站在内格尔一边的,虽然不认为内格尔预期的...
评分如果用单纯的生物学硬件实现快乐和痛苦,对于我们这个有意识的生物群体在自然界中的适应性会有怎样的影响呢?其价值是没什么实际意义的,即便是有,也局限于我们的文化系统内。因为这个系统只会解释出人能感知到的事物,却根本不会解释它自身。 什么是一个好的解释,在很大程度...
评分“异端——托马斯·内格尔是谁?为什么这么多学术同行指责他?” 附原文链接: https://www.douban.com/group/topic/37504420/ 先看了链接文章。 这篇文章描述了那场针对内格尔新书的来自“学界的愤怒”,文章作者其实在学术态度上是站在内格尔一边的,虽然不认为内格尔预期的...
评分“异端——托马斯·内格尔是谁?为什么这么多学术同行指责他?” 附原文链接: https://www.douban.com/group/topic/37504420/ 先看了链接文章。 这篇文章描述了那场针对内格尔新书的来自“学界的愤怒”,文章作者其实在学术态度上是站在内格尔一边的,虽然不认为内格尔预期的...
评分“异端——托马斯·内格尔是谁?为什么这么多学术同行指责他?” 附原文链接: https://www.douban.com/group/topic/37504420/ 先看了链接文章。 这篇文章描述了那场针对内格尔新书的来自“学界的愤怒”,文章作者其实在学术态度上是站在内格尔一边的,虽然不认为内格尔预期的...
图书标签: 哲学 心灵哲学 Nagel 伦理学 英文原版 西方哲学 人工智能 2012
In Mind and Cosmos Thomas Nagel argues that the widely accepted world view of materialist naturalism is untenable. The mind-body problem cannot be confined to the relation between animal minds and animal bodies. If materialism cannot accommodate consciousness and other mind-related aspects of reality, then we must abandon a purely materialist understanding of nature in general, extending to biology, evolutionary theory, and cosmology. Since minds are features of biological systems that have developed through evolution, the standard materialist version of evolutionary biology is fundamentally incomplete. And the cosmological history that led to the origin of life and the coming into existence of the conditions for evolution cannot be a merely materialist history. An adequate conception of nature would have to explain the appearance in the universe of materially irreducible conscious minds, as such. No such explanation is available, and the physical sciences, including molecular biology, cannot be expected to provide one. The book explores these problems through a general treatment of the obstacles to reductionism, with more specific application to the phenomena of consciousness, cognition, and value. The conclusion is that physics cannot be the theory of everything.
难道“心灵哲学”就是philosophy of mind么那真是我了个大槽= =……还有为毛常用标签里面会有“护教”= =…… / Nagel虽然竭力避免背上Platonism的metaphysical luggage,但是(好吧我觉得肯定是因为我没有看懂)我真的不明白他如果强调value最终是"independent",那要如何看待value的come into being与生命的进化正好同步(因为natural order的inclination)?而且更关键是为何前者会作用于后者?(还是因为natural order的inclination??)
评分Armchair philosopher没病下椅子走了两步,发现神棍早已在山顶俯视一切。另外,目测不出十年Chalmers也会写出这样的东西来,不吹不黑。
评分很多人对他提出了那个修饰过的目的论持批评态度,情有可缘。对我而言,更亲近的是那或隐或显的万物有灵论的想法。论证的要紧处,出现的有关直觉和常识的探讨,让人想到陈嘉映的某些观点。
评分Assuming — which of course cannot safely be assumed — that there is but one universe. But Deresiewicz knows as a fact that what he can perceive with his particular sensory configuration is “all there is.”
评分很多人对他提出了那个修饰过的目的论持批评态度,情有可缘。对我而言,更亲近的是那或隐或显的万物有灵论的想法。论证的要紧处,出现的有关直觉和常识的探讨,让人想到陈嘉映的某些观点。
Mind and Cosmos 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书