Leo Strauss (1899--1973) was the Robert Maynard Hutchins Distinguished Service Professor Emeritus in Political Science at the University of Chicago.
In this classic work, Leo Strauss examines the problem of natural right and argues that there is a firm foundation in reality for the distinction between right and wrong in ethics and politics. On the centenary of Strauss's birth, and the fiftieth anniversary of the Walgreen Lectures which spawned the work, Natural Right and History remains as controversial and essential as ever. "Strauss ...makes a significant contribution towards an understanding of the intellectual crisis in which we find ourselves ...[and] brings to his task an admirable scholarship and a brilliant, incisive mind."--John H. Hallowell, American Political Science Review Leo Strauss (1899-1973) was the Robert Maynard Hutchins Distinguished Service Professor Emeritus in Political Science at the University of Chicago.
發表於2025-03-24
Natural Right and History 2025 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
Leo Strauss, Natural Right and History, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1965 B. Locke At first glance Locke seems to reject altogether Hobbes's notion of natural law and to follow the traditional teaching. 【總論點:洛剋對霍布斯的隱蔽繼承】 Yet Lo...
評分 評分列奧.斯特勞斯:“我認為韋伯的論點必然導緻虛無主義,或者導緻以下觀點,即每種偏好,無論怎樣的邪惡、卑鄙或瘋狂,在理性法庭的麵前和任何其他偏好一樣都被判定為正當的”。 雖然“價值中立”者說他們隻是在學術研究的過程中持“中立”立場,但實際上,由於他們把價值和信仰...
圖書標籤: 政治哲學 施特勞斯 哲學 思想史 Strauss LeoStrauss 列奧·施特勞斯 政治
思想質地和論說力度比阿倫特差得太遠瞭。不是心平氣和,而是東扯西拉,念叨兩句口號。從頭到尾仔細讀完,幾乎催生齣瞭強迫癥哎。
評分一本必須認真對待的扯淡讀物。
評分THE classic on the debate between ancients and moderns on natural right/law. The best chapter, it seems to me, is the third one on the discovery of nature and its preconditions - worthy of comparison with his teacher Heidegger's "ontological" or "ontic" take.
評分隻讀瞭前兩章。。該是讀過的最難懂的瞭。。
評分其實吧leo自己也是屌絲一枚,但他卻總喜愛站在高富帥的角度看問題,而他這樣做所遇到的最大敵手就是屌絲中的大王盧梭君。本書可以看做是吐嚮individuality以及相對主義的鄙薄口水,可更名為“Strauss反對Rousseau”或者“Strauss拯救民主 ”。。。
Natural Right and History 2025 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載