弗雷德裏剋•M•韋洛剋(Frederic M. Wheelock,1902—1987)是美國著名的古典學傢,拉丁語教學權威。他在哈佛大學獲得博士學位,先後任教於哈佛大學、紐約市立大學、布魯剋林學院等名校,並以其在文本批評、古文書學和拉丁語等領域的研究而蜚聲古典學界。韋洛剋教授是美國古典學聯盟、美國語言學會和大西洋國傢古典學會的成員。本書是他畢生最具代錶性的傑作。
理查德•A•拉弗勒(Richard A. LaFleur)是美國古典學聯盟主席(1984—1986)。他在杜剋大學獲得古典學博士學位,從1972 年起任教於佐治亞大學,並在那裏擔任北美洲最大的古典學項目之一的負責人長達21 年。拉弗勒教授著有《21 世紀拉丁語:從概念到課堂》等多部著作,並於1984 年獲得美國語言學會“古典學傑齣教育奬”。
WHEELOCK'S LATIN: AUDIO FILES
When Professor Frederic M. Wheelock's Latin first appeared in 1956, the reviews extolled its thoroughness, organization, and conciseness; at least one reviewer predicted that the book "might well become the standard text" for introducing students to elementary Latin. Now, five decades later, that prediction has certainly proved accurate.
The revised sixth edition of Wheelock's Latin has all the features that have made it the best-selling single-volume beginning Latin textbook, many of them improved and expanded:
40 chapters with grammatical explanations and readings based on ancient Roman authors
Self-tutorial exercises with an answer key for independent study
A newly enlarged English-Latin/Latin-English vocabulary
A rich selection of original Latin readings -- unlike other textbooks, which contain primarily made-up Latin texts
Etymological aids
Also included are maps of the Mediterranean, Italy, and the Aegean area, as well as numerous photographs illustrating aspects of classical culture, mythology, and historical and literary figures presented in the chapter readings.
不全,不細,未必都正確,僅供參考。歡迎指正。 瑕不掩瑜,個人認為總的來說這本書還是很適閤自學入門的。 (1) 導言P.42錶 第二排單詞: “在古典拉丁語中是cheek”應接在第五行,“mouth”之後; (2) 導言P.43 第13行: “第14頁”應為“第41頁”; (3) P....
評分以前在電影與哲學小說中時常提到拉丁語,算是我一直想要瞭解的語言之一吧。特彆美國與歐洲的普及教育中也時常提到。 前兩天去書店,本是想買本法語教程,但偶然發現瞭《韋洛剋拉丁語》 特彆厚,當時就納悶這語言有這麼大信息量嗎?不過我對於有厚度的書,嚮來都有種不明言錶的...
評分The Sins of Lafleur by Merus Ipse on Sat Jun 28, 2008 12:00 am Hello all, I just completed my introductory Latin courses a few weeks ago, having used Wheelock. My teacher was of the opinion (he converted me) that Richard Lafleur, the revising editor, ...
評分盡管網上有很多非議,但我還是很堅定的說這是一本好教材。先不考慮書的裝幀定價之類的事情,就內容本身而言,確實是入門拉丁語很好的教材。我也曾很努力的學英語,托福也有個差不多的分數,但是就原版的韋洛剋,我真的看其來有些吃力,學習的時候甚至重心變成瞭搞清楚英語再說...
評分The Sins of Lafleur by Merus Ipse on Sat Jun 28, 2008 12:00 am Hello all, I just completed my introductory Latin courses a few weeks ago, having used Wheelock. My teacher was of the opinion (he converted me) that Richard Lafleur, the revising editor, ...
etymological study of Roman history. http://wheelockslatin.com/chapters/introduction/introduction.html
评分初學拉丁語的經典教材
评分雖然始終不覺得Wheelock是一本閤適的零基礎教材(Lingua Latina更好),但是還是要感謝Wheelock~畢竟相比於ReadingGreek,Wheelock的語法更有係統性,更適閤我這種語法控詞匯渣……期待le grec en 15 leçons拯救我的希臘文呀……以及下一本拉丁文教材是Lingua Latina
评分電子版的已經過瞭兩三遍瞭,不過等齣國瞭一定要買一本收藏
评分竟然把前麵四十課語法看完瞭……火急火燎地。不過好像看原文還是有障礙,打算再看幾本拉丁語教材之後再看後麵的loci。課文講得很清晰,基本上一看就能理解,不會造成障礙。每課的內容也不多,方便記憶。不過這本書是按照英語的語言習慣來講的,如果對英語語法沒有大緻瞭解的話,恐怕學起來會吃力。【這本書真的看瞭我好久好久啊。。。。可是看著看著,又不知道為什麼要看瞭。。。。。TT
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 onlinetoolsland.com All Rights Reserved. 本本书屋 版权所有