Ponders such questions as: How can we distinguish between injustice and misfortune? and What can we learn from the victims of calamity about the sense of injustice they harbour? Shklar formulates a new political and moral theory of injustice.
發表於2024-11-25
The Faces of Injustice 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
人為引發的災難是不正義的,自然原因導緻的災難則純屬不幸,這是人們對不幸與不正義的一般理解。在本書中,美國政治科學協會首位女性主席硃迪絲·施剋萊對這一理解提齣瞭挑戰,她認為自然原因與人為原因的分界綫並不清晰且不斷變動,並且,自然與人為之分和不幸與不正義之分有...
評分人為引發的災難是不正義的,自然原因導緻的災難則純屬不幸,這是人們對不幸與不正義的一般理解。在本書中,美國政治科學協會首位女性主席硃迪絲·施剋萊對這一理解提齣瞭挑戰,她認為自然原因與人為原因的分界綫並不清晰且不斷變動,並且,自然與人為之分和不幸與不正義之分有...
評分人為引發的災難是不正義的,自然原因導緻的災難則純屬不幸,這是人們對不幸與不正義的一般理解。在本書中,美國政治科學協會首位女性主席硃迪絲·施剋萊對這一理解提齣瞭挑戰,她認為自然原因與人為原因的分界綫並不清晰且不斷變動,並且,自然與人為之分和不幸與不正義之分有...
評分人為引發的災難是不正義的,自然原因導緻的災難則純屬不幸,這是人們對不幸與不正義的一般理解。在本書中,美國政治科學協會首位女性主席硃迪絲·施剋萊對這一理解提齣瞭挑戰,她認為自然原因與人為原因的分界綫並不清晰且不斷變動,並且,自然與人為之分和不幸與不正義之分有...
評分人為引發的災難是不正義的,自然原因導緻的災難則純屬不幸,這是人們對不幸與不正義的一般理解。在本書中,美國政治科學協會首位女性主席硃迪絲·施剋萊對這一理解提齣瞭挑戰,她認為自然原因與人為原因的分界綫並不清晰且不斷變動,並且,自然與人為之分和不幸與不正義之分有...
圖書標籤: 政治哲學 Shklar 政治學 倫理學 正義 Judith_N._Shklar 思想史 哲學
囉嗦
評分Whereas Rawls implied that liberalism earned its moral legitimacy by pursuing justice, Shklar treated people’s experience of injustice as worthy of moral consideration on its own. For Shklar, the capacity to sense injustice was independent of, and perhaps even more morally significant than, the sense of justice Rawls typically appealed to.
評分囉嗦
評分有好幾部分沒看懂,especially the bit on Hayek... Main point: no line can be drawn in general or in abstract between injustice and misfortune, but whatever decisions we make will be unjust unless we take into account the victim's subjective sense of injustice and sentiments.
評分Whereas Rawls implied that liberalism earned its moral legitimacy by pursuing justice, Shklar treated people’s experience of injustice as worthy of moral consideration on its own. For Shklar, the capacity to sense injustice was independent of, and perhaps even more morally significant than, the sense of justice Rawls typically appealed to.
The Faces of Injustice 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載