John Rogers Searle (born July 31, 1932 in Denver, Colorado) is the Slusser Professor of Philosophy at the University of California, Berkeley, and is noted for contributions to the philosophy of language, philosophy of mind and consciousness, on the characteristics of socially constructed versus physical realities, and on practical reason. He was awarded the Jean Nicod Prize in 2000.
发表于2024-11-22
Minds, Brains and Science 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书
因为原书大概是两年前看的了,当时未留有读书笔记所以塞尔在具体的意志自由问题上的看法我也忘得差不多了。很早以前就想填坑,随便说好了。 量子力学的诞生似乎给了意志自由新的地位 ---------绝逼不是这样。首先量子力学仍是统计力学,解决不了这个问题。其次如果大脑的运转...
评分塞尔的文章流畅而又幽默,但让最让我喜欢的是他对重点的反复唠叨。在他的唠叨下,论证显得更清晰,让人读后难忘。所以,读分析哲学,从塞尔入手是个不错的选择。 本书的初稿是塞尔于1984年在里斯讲座的演讲,以人与宇宙的关系为主题,重点讨论了如何让心理概念与物理概念相一致...
图书标签: 哲学 AI 人工智能 philosophy 思维 mind 语言 脑与认知神经科学
Minds, Brains and Science takes up just the problems that perplex people, and it does what good philosophy always does: it dispels the illusion caused by the specious collision of truths. How can we accept an intuitive commonsense view of ourselves as conscious, free, rational agents in a universe that science tells us consists of mindless physical particles? Searle briskly and lucidly sets out his arguments against the familiar positions in the philosophy of mind, and details the consequences of his ideas for the mind-body problem, artificial intelligence, cognitive science, and the philosophy of the social sciences.
Searle's book is an admirably clear and vigorous exposition of his views on a connected set of philosophical issues of importance and timeliness.
--John Perry
This book is aggressive, zealous, and acute. Searle's manner is that of a plain man in possession of plain truths that no one can reject if they are plainly enough stated. I cannot think of another book quite like it.
--Arthur Danto
想到个问题:(a)大学期末考期间通过对往年题进行泛化学习,从而拿到高分的人 和 (b)赛尔“中文房间”里那个靠词典翻译中文并用纸条交流的人 有什么本质区别? 答:在(b)里,一个“在外面”的观察者,只能产生出房间里的人会中文的印象;而(a),批卷老师只需凭借先验知识,就知道答得再好的人也大概率什么都不会(悲)
评分John Searle is dumb, where's your intentionality and mind in your molecular particles?
评分John Searle is dumb, where's your intentionality and mind in your molecular particles?
评分John Searle is dumb, where's your intentionality and mind in your molecular particles?
评分想到个问题:(a)大学期末考期间通过对往年题进行泛化学习,从而拿到高分的人 和 (b)赛尔“中文房间”里那个靠词典翻译中文并用纸条交流的人 有什么本质区别? 答:在(b)里,一个“在外面”的观察者,只能产生出房间里的人会中文的印象;而(a),批卷老师只需凭借先验知识,就知道答得再好的人也大概率什么都不会(悲)
Minds, Brains and Science 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书