John Rogers Searle (born July 31, 1932 in Denver, Colorado) is the Slusser Professor of Philosophy at the University of California, Berkeley, and is noted for contributions to the philosophy of language, philosophy of mind and consciousness, on the characteristics of socially constructed versus physical realities, and on practical reason. He was awarded the Jean Nicod Prize in 2000.
Minds, Brains and Science takes up just the problems that perplex people, and it does what good philosophy always does: it dispels the illusion caused by the specious collision of truths. How can we accept an intuitive commonsense view of ourselves as conscious, free, rational agents in a universe that science tells us consists of mindless physical particles? Searle briskly and lucidly sets out his arguments against the familiar positions in the philosophy of mind, and details the consequences of his ideas for the mind-body problem, artificial intelligence, cognitive science, and the philosophy of the social sciences.
Searle's book is an admirably clear and vigorous exposition of his views on a connected set of philosophical issues of importance and timeliness.
--John Perry
This book is aggressive, zealous, and acute. Searle's manner is that of a plain man in possession of plain truths that no one can reject if they are plainly enough stated. I cannot think of another book quite like it.
--Arthur Danto
發表於2025-02-07
Minds, Brains and Science 2025 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
因為原書大概是兩年前看的瞭,當時未留有讀書筆記所以塞爾在具體的意誌自由問題上的看法我也忘得差不多瞭。很早以前就想填坑,隨便說好瞭。 量子力學的誕生似乎給瞭意誌自由新的地位 ---------絕逼不是這樣。首先量子力學仍是統計力學,解決不瞭這個問題。其次如果大腦的運轉...
評分Anyway, the Chinese room is really not a good example. I believe in computationalist account of mind and there will be a computer with mind and soul one day.
評分1984年的書,我在30年後的2014年對其進行評論,似乎不太公平。 塞爾因為他在語言哲學上的貢獻,被寫進瞭教科書。更因為他的“中文屋”思想實驗,被普通公眾所知。 他在第一章提到,心靈之與大腦,就像某物的宏觀屬性和微觀屬性。但他在這裏講得很模糊,用的比喻是宏觀下冰的...
評分Anyway, the Chinese room is really not a good example. I believe in computationalist account of mind and there will be a computer with mind and soul one day.
評分我們的一切都是靠心和腦來支配和統治的,學習這樣的科學會使我們更瞭解自己,從而更好地支配自己的行為。
圖書標籤: 哲學 AI 人工智能 philosophy 思維 mind 語言 腦與認知神經科學
John Searle is dumb, where's your intentionality and mind in your molecular particles?
評分John Searle is dumb, where's your intentionality and mind in your molecular particles?
評分John Searle is dumb, where's your intentionality and mind in your molecular particles?
評分想到個問題:(a)大學期末考期間通過對往年題進行泛化學習,從而拿到高分的人 和 (b)賽爾“中文房間”裏那個靠詞典翻譯中文並用紙條交流的人 有什麼本質區彆? 答:在(b)裏,一個“在外麵”的觀察者,隻能産生齣房間裏的人會中文的印象;而(a),批捲老師隻需憑藉先驗知識,就知道答得再好的人也大概率什麼都不會(悲)
評分John Searle is dumb, where's your intentionality and mind in your molecular particles?
Minds, Brains and Science 2025 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載