发表于2024-11-26
Making it Explicit 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书
图书标签: 哲学 Brandom 分析哲学 新实用主义 语言学 西方现代哲学 西方哲学 language
What would something unlike us--a chimpanzee, say, or a computer--have to be able to do to qualify as a possible knower, like us? To answer this question at the very heart of our sense of ourselves, philosophers have long focused on intentionality and have looked to language as a key to this condition. Making It Explicit is an investigation into the nature of language--the social practices that distinguish us as rational, logical creatures--that revises the very terms of this inquiry. Where accounts of the relation between language and mind have traditionally rested on the concept of representation, this book sets out an alternate approach based on inference, and on a conception of certain kinds of implicit assessment that become explicit in language. Making It Explicit is the first attempt to work out in detail a theory that renders linguistic meaning in terms of use--in short, to explain how semantic content can be conferred on expressions and attitudes that are suitably caught up in social practices. </p>
At the center of this enterprise is a notion of discursive commitment. Being able to talk--and so in the fullest sense being able to think--is a matter of mastering the practices that govern such commitments, being able to keep track of one's own commitments and those of others. Assessing the pragmatic significance of speech acts is a matter of explaining the explicit in terms of the implicit. As he traces the inferential structure of the social practices within which things can be made conceptually explicit, the author defines the distinctively expressive role of logical vocabulary. This expressive account of language, mind, and logic is, finally, an account of who we are. </p>
the intentional challenge是每一个semanticist在有了一些extensional的经验之后都想担起的。布兰顿综合了康德实践哲学、弗雷格规范性理论和日常语言学派的语用理论提出了一种奠基于社会交往的言语行为的规范性语义学。他的一篇短论文还试图阐明这本书中同样涉及的一个关于意向性的理论:意向性应该奠基于意向归属的言语行为,而不是心理状态的形而上学地位。简而言之,我之族类就是能遵守规则以言行事。因为论证太繁复而且很成系统,没时间坚持读下去。以后有空可以进一步了解。
评分the intentional challenge是每一个semanticist在有了一些extensional的经验之后都想担起的。布兰顿综合了康德实践哲学、弗雷格规范性理论和日常语言学派的语用理论提出了一种奠基于社会交往的言语行为的规范性语义学。他的一篇短论文还试图阐明这本书中同样涉及的一个关于意向性的理论:意向性应该奠基于意向归属的言语行为,而不是心理状态的形而上学地位。简而言之,我之族类就是能遵守规则以言行事。因为论证太繁复而且很成系统,没时间坚持读下去。以后有空可以进一步了解。
评分the intentional challenge是每一个semanticist在有了一些extensional的经验之后都想担起的。布兰顿综合了康德实践哲学、弗雷格规范性理论和日常语言学派的语用理论提出了一种奠基于社会交往的言语行为的规范性语义学。他的一篇短论文还试图阐明这本书中同样涉及的一个关于意向性的理论:意向性应该奠基于意向归属的言语行为,而不是心理状态的形而上学地位。简而言之,我之族类就是能遵守规则以言行事。因为论证太繁复而且很成系统,没时间坚持读下去。以后有空可以进一步了解。
评分the intentional challenge是每一个semanticist在有了一些extensional的经验之后都想担起的。布兰顿综合了康德实践哲学、弗雷格规范性理论和日常语言学派的语用理论提出了一种奠基于社会交往的言语行为的规范性语义学。他的一篇短论文还试图阐明这本书中同样涉及的一个关于意向性的理论:意向性应该奠基于意向归属的言语行为,而不是心理状态的形而上学地位。简而言之,我之族类就是能遵守规则以言行事。因为论证太繁复而且很成系统,没时间坚持读下去。以后有空可以进一步了解。
评分the intentional challenge是每一个semanticist在有了一些extensional的经验之后都想担起的。布兰顿综合了康德实践哲学、弗雷格规范性理论和日常语言学派的语用理论提出了一种奠基于社会交往的言语行为的规范性语义学。他的一篇短论文还试图阐明这本书中同样涉及的一个关于意向性的理论:意向性应该奠基于意向归属的言语行为,而不是心理状态的形而上学地位。简而言之,我之族类就是能遵守规则以言行事。因为论证太繁复而且很成系统,没时间坚持读下去。以后有空可以进一步了解。
Making it Explicit 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书