For most Americans, candy is an uneasy pleasure, eaten with side helpings of guilt and worry. Yet candy accounts for only 6 percent of the added sugar in the American diet. And at least it’s honest about what it is—a processed food, eaten for pleasure, with no particular nutritional benefit. So why is candy considered especially harmful, when it’s not so different from the other processed foods, from sports bars to fruit snacks, that line supermarket shelves? How did our definitions of food and candy come to be so muddled? And how did candy come to be the scapegoat for our fears about the dangers of food?
In Candy: A Century of Panic and Pleasure, Samira Kawash tells the fascinating story of how candy evolved from a luxury good to a cheap, everyday snack. After candy making was revolutionized in the early decades of mass production, it was celebrated as a new kind of food for energy and enjoyment. Riding the rise in snacking and exploiting early nutritional science, candy was the first of the panoply of "junk foods" that would take over the American diet in the decades after the Second World War—convenient and pleasurable, for eating anytime or all the time.
And yet, food reformers and moral crusaders have always attacked candy, blaming it for poisoning, alcoholism, sexual depravity and fatal disease. These charges have been disproven and forgotten, but the mistrust of candy they produced has never diminished. The anxiety and confusion that most Americans have about their diets today is a legacy of the tumultuous story of candy, the most loved and loathed of processed foods.
Candy is an essential, addictive read for anyone who loves lively cultural history, who cares about food, and who wouldn’t mind feeling a bit better about eating a few jelly beans.
發表於2024-11-04
Candy 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
圖書標籤: 曆史 Food Candy Nutritionism
“糖”(Sugar)的曆史悠久,“糖果”(Candy)卻是非常晚近時期的産物。二者的差異性也是農業與工業社會分野的一個縮影——寫作上套路瞭點,對糖(果)從幸福甜蜜象徵到肥胖病態載體的流變挖掘得不錯。食品企業為瞭應對這種變化,最直接的迴應就是讓糖(果)變得“不可見”與“更健康”
評分通過體察SUGAR和CANDY在美國曆史中若即若離的狀態,將糖果和戰爭、性彆、國傢經濟和更廣闊的食物潮流聯係起來,認為妖魔化糖果是為瞭人們隨心所欲吃更為不健康的食物。但糖果作為精加工食品、垃圾食品、人工食品的代錶,體現瞭所謂“營養主義”對食物割裂碎片化的認識,食品工業的圈套。
評分通過體察SUGAR和CANDY在美國曆史中若即若離的狀態,將糖果和戰爭、性彆、國傢經濟和更廣闊的食物潮流聯係起來,認為妖魔化糖果是為瞭人們隨心所欲吃更為不健康的食物。但糖果作為精加工食品、垃圾食品、人工食品的代錶,體現瞭所謂“營養主義”對食物割裂碎片化的認識,食品工業的圈套。
評分“糖”(Sugar)的曆史悠久,“糖果”(Candy)卻是非常晚近時期的産物。二者的差異性也是農業與工業社會分野的一個縮影——寫作上套路瞭點,對糖(果)從幸福甜蜜象徵到肥胖病態載體的流變挖掘得不錯。食品企業為瞭應對這種變化,最直接的迴應就是讓糖(果)變得“不可見”與“更健康”
評分通過體察SUGAR和CANDY在美國曆史中若即若離的狀態,將糖果和戰爭、性彆、國傢經濟和更廣闊的食物潮流聯係起來,認為妖魔化糖果是為瞭人們隨心所欲吃更為不健康的食物。但糖果作為精加工食品、垃圾食品、人工食品的代錶,體現瞭所謂“營養主義”對食物割裂碎片化的認識,食品工業的圈套。
Candy 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載