Stephen Menn, (1964-), teaches Ancient Philosophy (Plato, Aristotle, Stoicism and neo-Platonism), Medieval Philosophy (Western and Islamic) and the History and Philosophy of Mathematics at McGill University.
This book is the first systematic study of Descartes' relation to Augustine. It offers a complete reevaluation of Descartes' thought and as such will be of major importance to all historians of medieval, neo-Platonic, or early modern philosophy. Stephen Menn demonstrates that Descartes uses Augustine's central ideas as a point of departure for a critique of medieval Aristotelian physics, which he replaces with a new, mechanistic anti-Aristotelian physics. Special features of the book include a reading of the Meditations, a comprehensive historical and philosophical introduction to Augustine's thought, a detailed account of Plotinus, and a contextualization of Descartes' mature philosophical project which explores both the framework within which it evolved and the early writings, to show how the collapse of the early project drove Descartes to the writings of Augustine.
冗長繁復,直接從遙遠的普羅提諾開始敘述,試著反駁吉爾鬆和古耶認為笛卡爾割裂理性與信仰的觀點,不過優點也是足夠冗長。
评分冗長繁復,直接從遙遠的普羅提諾開始敘述,試著反駁吉爾鬆和古耶認為笛卡爾割裂理性與信仰的觀點,不過優點也是足夠冗長。
评分之前讀瞭一些……結果懶的我到現在全忘瞭……目前看到的唯一一本本書把D和A聯係起來的-0-我的救命稻草。另:新浪愛問有電子版。造福後人。(雖然我看的是書~^^~)
评分冗長繁復,直接從遙遠的普羅提諾開始敘述,試著反駁吉爾鬆和古耶認為笛卡爾割裂理性與信仰的觀點,不過優點也是足夠冗長。
评分冗長繁復,直接從遙遠的普羅提諾開始敘述,試著反駁吉爾鬆和古耶認為笛卡爾割裂理性與信仰的觀點,不過優點也是足夠冗長。
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 onlinetoolsland.com All Rights Reserved. 本本书屋 版权所有