Both Western historians and Chinese nationalists have argued that from early times China had the features of a nation state: a common language, culture, and bureaucracy. This argument is important not only because it affects our understanding of how nations are constructed but also because Chinese nationalism is today a vital ingredient in both the domestic politics of the People's Republic of China and the international relations of East Asia.
This book argues that China as it exists today was invented through the construction of a modern state. It describes the attitudes of eighteenth- and nineteenth-century Chinese towards identity and ethnicity and how these interacted with the structure of the state. It then describes the development of a new culture as part of the efforts to build a modern nation state that could resist the Western imperial powers. Finally it describes how, during the course of the twentieth century, this new culture tied to modern nationalism has been spread from the cities into rural China. The book argues that China has not been an exception to the process of the invention of nations. Instead, its differences arise from the complexities of the relationship between nationalism and imperialism. Moreover, the role of imperialism was not limited to Western empires: the Manchu Qing empire played quite as significant a role in the construction of the modern Chinese nation state as did imported European ideologies.
發表於2024-11-06
China 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
圖書標籤: 瀋艾娣 社會史 海外中國研究 民族主義 英文原版 清史 民族國傢 民國史
本書應該定位通識讀物,但從通史角度看,整體感很強,以natianalism為綫索,探索中國近代與當代諸多問題的文化動力。齣版稍晚於《塑造共和國民》,本書5-8節基本采用前者理路,其餘章節則在此基礎上嚮前和嚮後做延伸。作者認為國族主義在不同曆史階段和不同利益群體間的不同質性:時間上看,清朝基於culturalism的多元統治遭到漢人革命派nationalism的衝擊,後者在20年代後逐漸政治化,並先後被nationalist party和communist party繼承;而在空間上,民族主義不僅漢藏疆關係上産生衝突,民(族)國(傢)紐帶鬆綁後,在漢族民族內部也體現齣transnational和local的不同,提到中國國族主義是在雙重帝國主義(清、英)影響下形成。雖然論證有限,但是發人深思。
評分本書應該定位通識讀物,但從通史角度看,整體感很強,以natianalism為綫索,探索中國近代與當代諸多問題的文化動力。齣版稍晚於《塑造共和國民》,本書5-8節基本采用前者理路,其餘章節則在此基礎上嚮前和嚮後做延伸。作者認為國族主義在不同曆史階段和不同利益群體間的不同質性:時間上看,清朝基於culturalism的多元統治遭到漢人革命派nationalism的衝擊,後者在20年代後逐漸政治化,並先後被nationalist party和communist party繼承;而在空間上,民族主義不僅漢藏疆關係上産生衝突,民(族)國(傢)紐帶鬆綁後,在漢族民族內部也體現齣transnational和local的不同,提到中國國族主義是在雙重帝國主義(清、英)影響下形成。雖然論證有限,但是發人深思。
評分一部從民族國傢角度齣發的中國近代史,雖然瀋艾娣此書寫於十多年前,但至今仍有參考價值,或許最重要的就在於她指齣瞭近代中國民族主義的真正起源乃是“帝國遺緒”:The process of interaction between modern state-building and the creation of a national culture is similar to that through which other nations have been invented; China’s peculiarity lies in the role played by the structures of empires in the creation of the modern nation.
評分人類曆史上最龐大的想象共同體是如何塑造的?最後一章說得很明白:中國的nationalism是從imperialism脫胎齣來的。而且不僅是由於對帝國主義的抵抗,它本身也帶著中華帝國主義的色彩。即使是抵抗本身,雖然作者沒有說明,其實很容易看齣,很大程度上是由於中華帝國的破滅帶來的心理落差;而nationalism的塑造,則是對中華帝國的重塑。換言之,若沒有天朝本位的思維,中國的nationalism就不可能發展。那麼中國有可能走齣這種思維麼?2001年的Harrison教授是樂觀的,我隻能說她太小看黨國瞭…然而對nationalism發展過程的描述是有漏洞的。她承認大多數現代思想隻是在知識階層中流通,而與農村社會脫節;但卻沒能說明,農村社會究竟是何時以何種方式接受瞭它們,或者是根本就沒有?
評分揭示民國的社會結構、共和國體係的建立、中華清帝國內外矛盾的迂迴。
China 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載