具体描述
读后感
Deceptively accessible and seductively titled, this book is highly theoretical. Such book likely to further the monologue tendency among anthropologists, while allure un-theoretical readers with a pompous sense of justice. Is this kind of writing style a so...
评分Deceptively accessible and seductively titled, this book is highly theoretical. Such book likely to further the monologue tendency among anthropologists, while allure un-theoretical readers with a pompous sense of justice. Is this kind of writing style a so...
评分Deceptively accessible and seductively titled, this book is highly theoretical. Such book likely to further the monologue tendency among anthropologists, while allure un-theoretical readers with a pompous sense of justice. Is this kind of writing style a so...
评分Deceptively accessible and seductively titled, this book is highly theoretical. Such book likely to further the monologue tendency among anthropologists, while allure un-theoretical readers with a pompous sense of justice. Is this kind of writing style a so...
评分Deceptively accessible and seductively titled, this book is highly theoretical. Such book likely to further the monologue tendency among anthropologists, while allure un-theoretical readers with a pompous sense of justice. Is this kind of writing style a so...
用户评价
文献做得很好啊
评分用governmentality从上而下分析教育制度，其实说不上哪里不靠谱，很多规则可能因为熟悉而淡化。但用教育/名校学位和成功/happiness联系起来并非东亚独有。再则，这样看下去学生们都是受体，完全受制度控制的（不然从做个人主义的也没法写东西了）。
评分这本书，作者用比较boring（听人语）的感觉写了我们熟悉的学校、学习的场景，历史化地见证如何进行的学习规范的规训。
评分语言的部分太弱，可惜
评分印象最深的是 literary masculinity
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 onlinetoolsland.com All Rights Reserved. 本本书屋 版权所有