约翰·菲尼斯系牛津大学法学教授、大学院(university college)法理学研究员。
First published in 1980, Natural Law and Natural Rights is widely heralded as a seminal contribution to the philosophy of law, and an authoritative restatement of natural law doctrine. It has offered generations of students and other readers a thorough grounding in the central issues of legal, moral, and political philosophy from Finnis's distinctive perspective. This new edition includes a substantial postscript by the author, in which he responds to thirty years of discussion, criticism and further work in the field to develop and refine the original theory. The book closely integrates the philosophy of law with ethics, social theory and political philosophy. The author develops a sustained and substantive argument; it is not a review of other people's arguments but makes frequent illustrative and critical reference to classical, modern, and contemporary writers in ethics, social and political theory, and jurisprudence. The preliminary First Part reviews a century of analytical jurisprudence to illustrate the dependence of every descriptive social science upon evaluations by the theorist. A fully critical basis for such evaluations is a theory of natural law. Standard contemporary objections to natural law theory are reviewed and shown to rest on serious misunderstandings. The Second Part develops in ten carefully structured chapters an account of: basic human goods and basic requirements of practical reasonableness, community and 'the common good'; justice; the logical structure of rights-talk; the bases of human rights, their specification and their limits; authority, and the formation of authoritative rules by non-authoritative persons and procedures; law, the Rule of Law, and the derivation of laws from the principles of practical reasonableness; the complex relation between legal and moral obligation; and the practical and theoretical problems created by unjust laws. A final Part develops a vigorous argument about the relation between 'natural law', 'natural theology' and 'revelation' - between moral concern and other ultimate questions.
此书所犯下的错误同时也是其最深刻之处。 一、古代自然法的根基在于形而上学,在于对终极真理/终极善的把握;而现代自然法的根基在于实践理性。但是,具体而言,究竟是实践理性的纯粹形式的自我立法,还是实践理性对某些基础价值的证认?作者在此反对康德,认肯后一个方案。这...
评分Link: http://jiong.wykehamist.com/blog/2006/12/what-is-reasonableness.html 剑桥面试的时候,那个教授不断强调的一个词,是段法律条文中的“reasonable”。在John Finnis的Natural Law and Natural Rights里面,作者不断强调的一个关键词,也是“practical reasonableness...
评分Link: http://jiong.wykehamist.com/blog/2006/12/what-is-reasonableness.html 剑桥面试的时候,那个教授不断强调的一个词,是段法律条文中的“reasonable”。在John Finnis的Natural Law and Natural Rights里面,作者不断强调的一个关键词,也是“practical reasonableness...
明确意识到了自然法需要面对的每一个重要挑战,对现代知识架构带来的根本问题作了细致辨析,充分利用了当代实践哲学的可取资源,在古典权威面前不卑不亢。非常全面、深刻的辩护。
评分明确意识到了自然法需要面对的每一个重要挑战,对现代知识架构带来的根本问题作了细致辨析,充分利用了当代实践哲学的可取资源,在古典权威面前不卑不亢。非常全面、深刻的辩护。
评分还有什么可以说的呢?最近三十年最重要的自然法理论著作有两本,一本是Natural Law and Natural Rights另一本是Natural Law and Natural Rights的第二版。正如中国最好的法学院是中国政法大学法学院,第二好的是中国政法大学其他法学院。
评分明确意识到了自然法需要面对的每一个重要挑战,对现代知识架构带来的根本问题作了细致辨析,充分利用了当代实践哲学的可取资源,在古典权威面前不卑不亢。非常全面、深刻的辩护。
评分Do not do evil in the hope that good may come after it.
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 onlinetoolsland.com All Rights Reserved. 本本书屋 版权所有