Between Kant and Hegel

乐小军，复旦大学博士，上海师范大学哲学学院副教授。

出版者:Harvard University Press

作者:Dieter Henrich

页数:384

出版时间:2003-10-15

价格:USD 59.95

装帧:Hardcover

isbn号码:9780674007734

图书标签:哲学康德黑格尔德国唯心主义Henrich思想史德国观念论德国古典哲学

Electrifying when they were first delivered in 1973, becoming legendary in the years since, as transcripts passed from hand to hand, Dieter Henrich's lectures on German idealism were the first contact a major German philosopher had made with an American audience since the onset of World War II. They remain, to this day, one of the most eloquent interpretations of the central philosophical tradition of Germany and the way in which it relates to the concerns of contemporary philosophy. Thanks to the editorial work of David Pacini, one of the original auditors of Henrich's course, the lectures appear here with annotations that link them to the editions of the masterworks of German philosophy as they are now available. </p>

Henrich describes the movement that led from Kant to Hegel, beginning with an interpretation of the structure and tensions of Kant's system. He locates the Kantian movement and revival of Spinoza, as sketched by F. H. Jacobi, in the intellectual conditions of the time and in the philosophical motivations of modern thought. And he explains the motives behind Fichte's Doctrine of Science. Henrich connects this history to the poet Hölderlin's original philosophy and to the thought of the founders of Romanticism, Novalis and Friedrich Schlegel. He concludes with an interpretation of the basic design of Hegel's system. </p>

读后感

第220页，“...and it is a longing for the perfect self, for the entirely independent self. Indeed, it is a yearning for the ultimate overcoming of all limitations imposed by the not-self. In its actuality, longing operates in our mind in a way that is nothi...

第220页，“...and it is a longing for the perfect self, for the entirely independent self. Indeed, it is a yearning for the ultimate overcoming of all limitations imposed by the not-self. In its actuality, longing operates in our mind in a way that is nothi...

因为在台大上彭文本老师的德国观念论，才知道Dieter Henrich这个人，才开始看《在康德与黑格尔之间》这本书。在序言一开始，Henrich就向读者指出从1781年康德出版第一批判，到1804年他死去时，黑格尔已经建立自己的哲学体系，德国观念论在18世纪最后的二十年里完成了从康德，穿...  

因为在台大上彭文本老师的德国观念论，才知道Dieter Henrich这个人，才开始看《在康德与黑格尔之间》这本书。在序言一开始，Henrich就向读者指出从1781年康德出版第一批判，到1804年他死去时，黑格尔已经建立自己的哲学体系，德国观念论在18世纪最后的二十年里完成了从康德，穿...  

第220页，“...and it is a longing for the perfect self, for the entirely independent self. Indeed, it is a yearning for the ultimate overcoming of all limitations imposed by the not-self. In its actuality, longing operates in our mind in a way that is nothi...

用户评价

读了讲费希特的几章，作者很有些高见，其中论证费希特是第一位现代神学家的一节尤其令人印象深刻。由于是讲稿，非常的易读。其他章节粗看来也很好，只是对谢林似乎着墨很有限，留待以后。

读了讲费希特的几章，作者很有些高见，其中论证费希特是第一位现代神学家的一节尤其令人印象深刻。由于是讲稿，非常的易读。其他章节粗看来也很好，只是对谢林似乎着墨很有限，留待以后。

读完黑格尔，我感觉我的男神谱上又增加了一位。以及，康德和黑格尔爷爷就那么喜欢卢梭么，他们不觉得《忏悔录》很香艳，很不适应睡前阅读么。。。P.S：英文版读起来太艰难了，所幸我看中文版也不是很懂。。。

I. The systematic structure of Kant's philosophy

最好的观念论史，虽然还要加上之一。亨老爷差不多算是贵圈中讲单口的郭德纲了，太能讲故事了。不过正文里面居然不给谢林任何位置，这也太残酷了。对象谢林傲娇就算了，但对斯宾诺莎视而不见算什么，就那么爱荷尔德林的新柏拉图主义一元论？