包弼德(Peter K. Bol)是美國哈佛大學東亞語言與文明係的查理斯•卡威爾(Charles H. Carswell)講座教授,他同時也主持哈佛大學《中國曆史地理信息係統》(Chinese Historical GIS) 以及《中國曆代人物傳記資料庫》(Chinese Biographical Database)等大型數據庫的建設工作。其著作包括 This Culture of Ours: Intellectual Transitions in T'ang and Sung China (1992,中譯本《斯文:唐宋思想的轉型》),並閤編Emperor Huizong and Late Northern Song China: The Politics of Culture and the Culture of Politics (2006) 以及Confucianism and Ecology (1998) 等書。包弼德最近十餘年的研究專注於討論理學的曆史角色,以及從地方史的視角齣發探討中國社會文化的變遷。
Where does Neo-Confucianism - a movement that from the twelfth to the seventeenth centuries profoundly influenced the way people understood the world and responded to it - fit into our story of China's history?This interpretive, at times polemical, inquiry into the Neo-Confucian engagement with the literati as the social and political elite, local society, and the imperial state during the Song, Yuan, and Ming dynasties is also a reflection on the role of the middle period in China's history. The book argues that as Neo-Confucians put their philosophy of learning into practice in local society, they justified a new social ideal in which society at the local level was led by the literati with state recognition and support. The later imperial order, in which the state accepted local elite leadership as necessary to its own existence, survived even after Neo-Confucianism lost its hold on the center of intellectual culture in the seventeenth century but continued as the foundation of local education. It is the contention of this book that Neo-Confucianism made that order possible.
發表於2025-03-31
Neo-Confucianism in History 2025 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
《曆史上的理學》是第一部在公元11世紀至17世紀的政治、經濟、社會和文化變遷的大背景下,詳細地闡釋理學的萌發、興盛和末落的著作。 包弼德教授在進行這項研究方麵具有得天獨厚的優勢。他對於中國政治史和社會經濟史領域的前沿進展有深透的瞭解。他嚴謹地將理學界定為一種道德...
評分《曆史上的理學》是第一部在公元11世紀至17世紀的政治、經濟、社會和文化變遷的大背景下,詳細地闡釋理學的萌發、興盛和末落的著作。 包弼德教授在進行這項研究方麵具有得天獨厚的優勢。他對於中國政治史和社會經濟史領域的前沿進展有深透的瞭解。他嚴謹地將理學界定為一種道德...
評分這本書的一個特彆之處是在附錄裏添加瞭一份對於本書的書評及作者的迴應。許齊雄和王昌偉在檢討瞭北美學界近五十年的宋明理學研究之後,指齣哲學的(以狄百瑞為中心)和曆史的(以餘英時為代錶)這兩種研究路徑先天就有不可避免的缺陷,前者是脫離瞭具體時空的種種概念的無頭迴...
評分這本書的一個特彆之處是在附錄裏添加瞭一份對於本書的書評及作者的迴應。許齊雄和王昌偉在檢討瞭北美學界近五十年的宋明理學研究之後,指齣哲學的(以狄百瑞為中心)和曆史的(以餘英時為代錶)這兩種研究路徑先天就有不可避免的缺陷,前者是脫離瞭具體時空的種種概念的無頭迴...
圖書標籤: 思想史 海外中國研究 理學 Bol 曆史 包弼德 社會史 海外漢學
讀完瞭,想吐。
評分Neo-Confucianism as social movement, and an alternative to the New Policies. 有時間重新過一下《中國轉嚮內在》,補筆記。往下可以無縫銜接王汎森。
評分因為專攻非歷史,所以不好多說。但覺得隻是將《斯文》裡麵的觀點換瞭方法、補充瞭一些,又說瞭一遍
評分讀完瞭,想吐。
評分資格考書目
Neo-Confucianism in History 2025 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載