包弼德(Peter K. Bol)是美国哈佛大学东亚语言与文明系的查理斯•卡威尔(Charles H. Carswell)讲座教授,他同时也主持哈佛大学《中国历史地理信息系统》(Chinese Historical GIS) 以及《中国历代人物传记资料库》(Chinese Biographical Database)等大型数据库的建设工作。其著作包括 This Culture of Ours: Intellectual Transitions in T'ang and Sung China (1992,中译本《斯文:唐宋思想的转型》),并合编Emperor Huizong and Late Northern Song China: The Politics of Culture and the Culture of Politics (2006) 以及Confucianism and Ecology (1998) 等书。包弼德最近十余年的研究专注于讨论理学的历史角色,以及从地方史的视角出发探讨中国社会文化的变迁。
发表于2024-11-21
Neo-Confucianism in History 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书
中国人在回顾历史时,最喜欢称引大唐盛世,但真正影响后世至为深远的,却是两宋奠定的政治和文化体系——借用严复的名言:“中国所以成为今日现象者,为善为恶姑不具论,而为宋人所造就,什九可断言也。”而宋朝的遗产中,最为重要的,无疑是理学:一定程度上正是它形塑了此后...
评分这本书的一个特别之处是在附录里添加了一份对于本书的书评及作者的回应。许齐雄和王昌伟在检讨了北美学界近五十年的宋明理学研究之后,指出哲学的(以狄百瑞为中心)和历史的(以余英时为代表)这两种研究路径先天就有不可避免的缺陷,前者是脱离了具体时空的种种概念的无头回...
评分 评分新書資訊:历史上的理学(包弼德) 历史上的理学(社会经济史译丛)(Neo-Confucianism in History) 作者:(美国)包弼德(Peter K. Bol) 译者:(新加坡)王昌伟 基本信息 ·出版社:浙江大学出版社 ·页码:307 页 ·出版日期:2010年01月 ·ISBN:9787308072106 ·条形码:9787308...
评分新書資訊:历史上的理学(包弼德) 历史上的理学(社会经济史译丛)(Neo-Confucianism in History) 作者:(美国)包弼德(Peter K. Bol) 译者:(新加坡)王昌伟 基本信息 ·出版社:浙江大学出版社 ·页码:307 页 ·出版日期:2010年01月 ·ISBN:9787308072106 ·条形码:9787308...
图书标签: 思想史 海外中国研究 理学 Bol 历史 包弼德 社会史 海外漢學
Where does Neo-Confucianism - a movement that from the twelfth to the seventeenth centuries profoundly influenced the way people understood the world and responded to it - fit into our story of China's history?This interpretive, at times polemical, inquiry into the Neo-Confucian engagement with the literati as the social and political elite, local society, and the imperial state during the Song, Yuan, and Ming dynasties is also a reflection on the role of the middle period in China's history. The book argues that as Neo-Confucians put their philosophy of learning into practice in local society, they justified a new social ideal in which society at the local level was led by the literati with state recognition and support. The later imperial order, in which the state accepted local elite leadership as necessary to its own existence, survived even after Neo-Confucianism lost its hold on the center of intellectual culture in the seventeenth century but continued as the foundation of local education. It is the contention of this book that Neo-Confucianism made that order possible.
继续深化了他的地方化观点和社会史的方法,可能不够全面,但是把自己的观点阐述得很好
评分读完了,想吐。
评分前六章非常强,几乎是一气呵成。对问题讨论很细致。很多点都可以进行比较性讨论。虽然个人感觉在一些更根本的问题上对比还是略微不足,但是不可否认这本书所达到的高度。第七章就稍显逊色一些。整体行文来讲,如何用相对直白的语言来叙述和概括性总结思想史真的是很见功力。这点Bol真的很厉害。
评分strong, strong, and strong, both philosophically and historically. a great contextualization of ideas and human thinking as a historical subject following "this culture of ours." he is too strong to be imitated. one got to find one's own philosophy in order to be as insightful as him.
评分读完了,想吐。
Neo-Confucianism in History 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书