包弼德(Peter K. Bol)是美国哈佛大学东亚语言与文明系的查理斯•卡威尔(Charles H. Carswell)讲座教授,他同时也主持哈佛大学《中国历史地理信息系统》(Chinese Historical GIS) 以及《中国历代人物传记资料库》(Chinese Biographical Database)等大型数据库的建设工作。其著作包括 This Culture of Ours: Intellectual Transitions in T'ang and Sung China (1992,中译本《斯文:唐宋思想的转型》),并合编Emperor Huizong and Late Northern Song China: The Politics of Culture and the Culture of Politics (2006) 以及Confucianism and Ecology (1998) 等书。包弼德最近十余年的研究专注于讨论理学的历史角色,以及从地方史的视角出发探讨中国社会文化的变迁。
发表于2025-03-04
Neo-Confucianism in History 2025 pdf epub mobi 电子书
很不错的一本书,对问题的分析还是切中肯綮的,至少没有其他某些老外的“隔离”。作者把理学至于广阔的背景下加以考察,清晰地勾勒出其发生发展的脉络。细节方面值得称道处亦不少:比如,作者认为,不应该把汉学和宋学的差异仅仅分析成重训诂和重义理的二元对立。又如,作者认...
评分这本书的一个特别之处是在附录里添加了一份对于本书的书评及作者的回应。许齐雄和王昌伟在检讨了北美学界近五十年的宋明理学研究之后,指出哲学的(以狄百瑞为中心)和历史的(以余英时为代表)这两种研究路径先天就有不可避免的缺陷,前者是脱离了具体时空的种种概念的无头回...
评分 评分《历史上的理学》是第一部在公元11世纪至17世纪的政治、经济、社会和文化变迁的大背景下,详细地阐释理学的萌发、兴盛和末落的著作。 包弼德教授在进行这项研究方面具有得天独厚的优势。他对于中国政治史和社会经济史领域的前沿进展有深透的了解。他严谨地将理学界定为一种道德...
评分Taizong (r. 976-97), turned their attention to state building: defining the border, controlling independent military governors, recruiting civil administrators, regularizing tax collection and military provisioning, and re-establishing a national legal syst...
图书标签: 思想史 海外中国研究 理学 Bol 历史 包弼德 社会史 海外漢學
Where does Neo-Confucianism - a movement that from the twelfth to the seventeenth centuries profoundly influenced the way people understood the world and responded to it - fit into our story of China's history?This interpretive, at times polemical, inquiry into the Neo-Confucian engagement with the literati as the social and political elite, local society, and the imperial state during the Song, Yuan, and Ming dynasties is also a reflection on the role of the middle period in China's history. The book argues that as Neo-Confucians put their philosophy of learning into practice in local society, they justified a new social ideal in which society at the local level was led by the literati with state recognition and support. The later imperial order, in which the state accepted local elite leadership as necessary to its own existence, survived even after Neo-Confucianism lost its hold on the center of intellectual culture in the seventeenth century but continued as the foundation of local education. It is the contention of this book that Neo-Confucianism made that order possible.
Neo-Confucianism as social movement, and an alternative to the New Policies. 有时间重新过一下《中国转向内在》,补笔记。往下可以无缝衔接王汎森。
评分Neo-Confucianism as social movement, and an alternative to the New Policies. 有时间重新过一下《中国转向内在》,补笔记。往下可以无缝衔接王汎森。
评分strong, strong, and strong, both philosophically and historically. a great contextualization of ideas and human thinking as a historical subject following "this culture of ours." he is too strong to be imitated. one got to find one's own philosophy in order to be as insightful as him.
评分把理学的产生置于唐宋变革的社会背景下来考察,指出是对王安石新法的反动。
评分感覺是為普知大眾而寫。不過角度很新穎: neoconfunianism is not a philosophy , instead, it was more like a intellectual movement
Neo-Confucianism in History 2025 pdf epub mobi 电子书