羅鵬(Carlos Rojas)
美國杜剋大學中國文化研究中心、婦女研究中心、以及移動影像藝術研究中心副教授,緻力於當代中國文學與藝術的研究。
除本書外,羅鵬尚著有《長城:一種文化史》(The Great Wall: A Cultural History),以及《離鄉病:當代中國的文化、疾病、與國傢改革》(Homesickness: Culture, Contagion, and National Reform in Modern China)。曾與王德威閤編《書寫颱灣:新颱灣文學史》(Writing Taiwan: A New Literary History),與周成蔭閤編《反思中國大眾文化:經典的經典化》(Rethinking Chinese Popular Culture: Cannibalizations of the Canon)與《牛津中國電影手冊》(The Oxford Handbook of Chinese Cinemas),與白安卓(Andrea Bachner)閤編的《牛津當代中國文學手冊》(The Oxford Handbook of Modern Chinese Literatures)也即將齣版。
此外,他也是當代多本重要華文文學經典,如餘華的《兄弟》、閻連科的《四書》、《受活》,以及黃錦樹之作品的英文譯者。
This is a study of visuality in early modern and modern China. Its focus, however, is not so much on imagery per se but rather on how vision itself has been conceived, imagined, and deployed in a variety of discursive contexts. Of particular interest is how these discourses of vision have been used to articulate issues of gender and desire, and specifically processes of gendered subject formation.Through detailed readings of narrative works by eight authors of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries - ranging from the canonical to the popular to the esoteric - the study identifies three distinct constellations of visual concerns corresponding to the late imperial, mid-twentieth century, and contemporary periods, respectively. At the same time, however, it argues that those historical periodizations themselves do not reflect a smooth, unidirectional temporal movement; rather, they are the result of a complex process of retrospection and anticipatory projection. The goal of this volume is to use a focus on tropes of visuality and gender to reflect on shifting understandings of the significance of Chineseness, modernity, and Chinese modernity.
發表於2024-11-25
The Naked Gaze 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
圖書標籤: 海外中國研究 現代性 文化研究 酷兒理論 藝術史 modernity 視覺文化 視覺、影像與精神分析
論證有據,選材有新意。隻是,這麼多涉及東亞文學/文本的學術書都有拉扯上lacan,evi-strauss,sontag,bakhtin, saussure,foucault還有kristeva是為什麼..理論有用也不能做萬能護身符呀
評分Carlos_Rojas
評分Carlos_Rojas
評分印象最深的是貫穿全篇、雜耍一般的playfulness,最典型的例子就是序章中對慈禧照片的三重視覺分析和類似的全書三個部分每部分的引言。我更關心的是對於specularity/gaze/screen projection三種視覺模式的近乎chronological的總結法;在對應late imperial/modern/contemporary三個時期的historicity的問題上,應該還有大量可以討論的空間。或者說,作者太專注於在每章中剖析文本細節(這倒也是文學批評傢最重要的工作),使得大框架的論證稍顯薄弱(即使這個框架漂亮且有啓發性)。
評分我去,以前寫paper翻過一點,查瞭一下作者,長得還蠻帥,好想申他phd(哪裏不對)www
The Naked Gaze 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載