What Intelligence Tests Miss

Keith E. Stanovich is Emeritus Professor of Applied Psychology and Human Development at the University of Toronto and former Canada Research Chair of Applied Cognitive Science. He is the author of over 200 scientific articles and seven books. He received his BA degree in psychology from Ohio State University in 1973 and his PhD in psychology from the University of Michigan in 1977.

出版者:Yale University Press

作者:Keith E. Stanovich

页数:328

出版时间:2010-2-23

价格:GBP 15.00

装帧:Paperback

isbn号码:9780300164626

图书标签:心理学思维认知科学思考psychology认知&神经&⼼理科学阳志平英文原版

承接 住宅 自建房 室内改造 装修设计 免费咨询 QQ：624617358 一级注册建筑师 亲自为您回答、经验丰富，价格亲民。无论项目大小，都全力服务。期待合作，欢迎咨询！QQ：624617358

Critics of intelligence tests - writers such as Robert Sternberg, Howard Gardner, and Daniel Goleman - have argued in recent years that these tests neglect important qualities such as emotion, empathy, and interpersonal skills. However, such critiques imply that though intelligence tests may miss certain key noncognitive areas, they encompass most of what is important in the cognitive domain. In this book, Keith Stanovich challenges this widely held assumption. Stanovich shows that IQ tests (or their proxies, such as the SAT) are radically incomplete as measures of cognitive functioning. They fail to assess traits that most people associate with 'good thinking', skills such as judgement and decision-making. Such cognitive skills are crucial to real-world behaviour, affecting the way we plan, evaluate critical evidence, judge risks and probabilities, and make effective decisions. IQ tests fail to assess these skills of rational thought, even though they are measurable cognitive processes. Rational thought is just as important as intelligence, Stanovich argues, and it should be valued as highly as the abilities currently measured on intelligence tests.

读后感

详情可到：http://www.jianshu.com/p/9a3691d9a074 ##理性之心 > 智力与理性之别 信息加工机制： + 快：自主心智 + 慢：算法心智&反省心智 即是传统智力&理性思维 广义理论与狭义智力理论 >MAMBIT&合理决策（前者） 与 MAMBIT（后者） + MAMBIT&合理决策 > 二者的桥梁...  

全书的精华都在第二部分，就是常见的思维误区。第二部分绝对值五颗星！哈哈。第一部分都在论证为啥聪明人也会犯傻，其实就是探讨主流智商测试的缺陷，对个人而言没有太大的帮助……作者写的很严谨，书也就没有那么好读，以下是边看边做的一些笔记，可以配合看书的时候一起看，...  

本书在《思考快与慢》的两个系统理论上增加了一个层面（书中引用了许多前者的实验结果，许多内容也差不多），自主心智、算法心智与反省心智。个人理解为就是直觉、智力和理性。该书用几乎一半的篇幅论证了现有智商概念的不科学，提出要将对理性的概念单独列出并单独测验，这部...  

在一次采访中，记者问道：您有没有写书的计划？ 巴菲特（伯克希尔主席）：如果我要写书的话，书名就是《为什么聪明人总是做傻事》。 芒格（伯克希尔副主席）：那就是我的自传。 本书作者斯坦诺维奇试图回答的正是这一问题。 (一)理性的定义 理性的定义是：对世界有正确的...  

一句话概括：聪明不等于理性，理性决定人是否会做蠢事。 读后感： ”智商“，这是个被大众用烂的词，就像”知识“一样。绝大多数人对日常生活都没有深思，有的，只是思考的姿态。很多人都认为 ”智商“和”知识“都是多多益善。谁不想被别人夸赞智商高？所谓的”智商高“...  

用户评价

还需回过头重读一些章节，以及梳理整理写篇笔记之类。个人觉得理性这是学校教育缺失的一环，是每个人都需要补课的。

选择性看看

把Thinking, Fast and Slow的内容包个“智商”的皮，再到处拿点成果就成书了，那写书也太容易了吧...书中关于Daniel C. Dennett的“直觉泵”倒是不错的指引，贝叶斯公式的应用也初露端倪。

还需回过头重读一些章节，以及梳理整理写篇笔记之类。个人觉得理性这是学校教育缺失的一环，是每个人都需要补课的。

选择性看看