Ahmet T. Kuru is an associate professor of political science at San Diego State University. He was the Postdoctoral Scholar and Assistant Director of the Center for the Study of Democracy, Toleration, and Religion at Columbia University. Kuru received his PhD from the University of Washington, Seattle. He is the author of Secularism and State Policies toward Religion: The United States, France, and Turkey (Cambridge University Press, 2009). This book is based on his dissertation that was given the Wildavsky Best Dissertation Award by Religion and Politics Section of the American Political Science Association.

Kuru’s publications also include "Secularism, State Policies, and Muslims in Europe: Analyzing French Exceptionalism," Comparative Politics, Fall 2008; "Passive and Assertive Secularism: Historical Conditions, Ideological Struggles, and State Policies towards Religion," World Politics, Summer 2007; and "Globalization and Diversification of Islamic Movements: Three Turkish Cases," Political Science Quarterly, Summer 2005.

Why do secular states pursue different policies toward religion? This book provides a generalizable argument about the impact of ideological struggles on the public policy making process, as well as a state-religion regimes index of 197 countries. More specifically, it analyzes why American state policies are largely tolerant of religion, whereas French and Turkish policies generally prohibit its public visibility, as seen in their bans on Muslim headscarves. In the United States, the dominant ideology is "passive secularism," which requires the state to play a passive role, by allowing public visibility of religion. Dominant ideology in France and Turkey is "assertive secularism," which demands that the state play an assertive role in excluding religion from the public sphere. Passive and assertive secularism became dominant in these cases through certain historical processes, particularly the presence or absence of an ancien régime based on the marriage between monarchy and hegemonic religion during state-building periods.

Jose Casanova, Georgetown University: "This is a pathbreaking book that shifts the attention from contentious debates over secularism as a norm and over the model of the secular state to the more fruitful task of comparing varieties of secularism and understanding the complex struggles that led to the historical formation of each particular type of secular state. It provides that secularism is not just a doctrine of separation of church and state but is most importantly a mode of state regulation in society. Kuru has opened up a field of study that should include many other varieties of secularism: Indian, Chinese, Russian, Mexican, Indonesian, and so forth."