American historian and philosopher of science, a leading contributor to the change of focus in the philosophy and sociology of science in the 1960s. Thomas Samuel Kuhn was born in Cincinnati, Ohio. He received a doctorate in theoretical physics from Harvard University in 1949. But he later shifted his interest to the history and philosophy of science, which he taught at Harvard, the University of California at Berkeley, Princeton University, and Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT).
In 1962, Kuhn published The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, which depicted the development of the basic natural sciences in an innovative way. According to Kuhn, the sciences do not uniformly progress strictly by scientific method. Rather, there are two fundamentally different phases of scientific development in the sciences. In the first phase, scientists work within a paradigm (set of accepted beliefs). When the foundation of the paradigm weakens and new theories and scientific methods begin to replace it, the next phase of scientific discovery takes place. Kuhn believes that scientific progress—that is, progress from one paradigm to another—has no logical reasoning. Kuhn's theory has triggered widespread, controversial discussion across many scientific disciplines.
A good book may have the power to change the way we see the world, but a great book actually becomes part of our daily consciousness, pervading our thinking to the point that we take it for granted, and we forget how provocative and challenging its ideas once were—and still are. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions is that kind of book. When it was first published in 1962, it was a landmark event in the history and philosophy of science. Fifty years later, it still has many lessons to teach.
With The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Kuhn challenged long-standing linear notions of scientific progress, arguing that transformative ideas don’t arise from the day-to-day, gradual process of experimentation and data accumulation but that the revolutions in science, those breakthrough moments that disrupt accepted thinking and offer unanticipated ideas, occur outside of “normal science,” as he called it. Though Kuhn was writing when physics ruled the sciences, his ideas on how scientific revolutions bring order to the anomalies that amass over time in research experiments are still instructive in our biotech age.
This new edition of Kuhn’s essential work in the history of science includes an insightful introduction by Ian Hacking, which clarifies terms popularized by Kuhn, including paradigm and incommensurability, and applies Kuhn’s ideas to the science of today. Usefully keyed to the separate sections of the book, Hacking’s introduction provides important background information as well as a contemporary context. Newly designed, with an expanded index, this edition will be eagerly welcomed by the next generation of readers seeking to understand the history of our perspectives on science.
發表於2025-01-31
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions 2025 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
前言:我作為一個業餘逼格提升愛好者,雜七雜八地讀瞭一些科學哲學文章,並粗略地通讀瞭托馬斯•庫恩的裏程碑式著作《科學革命的結構》。恰逢所裏也有人對此也有興趣,姑且寫點自己對這本書的理解,權當拋磚引玉。文中難免有偏頗疏漏之處,大傢見諒。 托馬斯•庫恩所著...
評分[美]托馬斯•庫恩《科學革命的結構》(北京大學科技哲學叢書),金吾倫、鬍新和譯,北京大學齣版社,200頁,2003年1月,定價:14元。 托馬斯•庫恩的《科學革命的結構》(The Structure of Scientific Revolutions)[1](以下簡稱《結構》)算得上是二十世紀學術...
評分《自然辨證法》 恩格斯 著 中共中央馬、恩、列、斯著作編譯局譯 1971年8月1版 1971年9月1印 《科學革命的結構》 [美國] 托馬斯•庫恩 著 金吾倫 鬍新和 譯 北京大學齣版社 2003年1月1版 2006年10月5印 以下引文中A錶示前書,B錶示後書 把這兩本書放在一起比較,兩位作...
評分《科學革命的結構》這本書,並不是一本著名的人類學讀物,但是正如物理學傢們整日標榜自己所學是萬能的學科一樣,我們還是得承認,科學一旦成為瞭一種科學史,對於其他的學科以及社會的發展都很有藉鑒的意義。 作者希望通過這本書,來改變一種對於科學的認識,那麼既然...
評分[美]托馬斯•庫恩《科學革命的結構》(北京大學科技哲學叢書),金吾倫、鬍新和譯,北京大學齣版社,200頁,2003年1月,定價:14元。 托馬斯•庫恩的《科學革命的結構》(The Structure of Scientific Revolutions)[1](以下簡稱《結構》)算得上是二十世紀學術...
圖書標籤: 科學哲學 哲學 科學史 science 曆史 科學 英文版 科學人文
主意看起來很簡單但是其實還是挺復雜的,一不小心就會(像我的教授一樣)把Kuhn誤讀。The main purpose of this book is to dispense science from naive rules and methods, the messianic Truth, and transcendental Nature, but not to argue that science does not progress and scientists in different communities cannot possibly communicate with each other. Weakened geniuses' role.
評分主意看起來很簡單但是其實還是挺復雜的,一不小心就會(像我的教授一樣)把Kuhn誤讀。The main purpose of this book is to dispense science from naive rules and methods, the messianic Truth, and transcendental Nature, but not to argue that science does not progress and scientists in different communities cannot possibly communicate with each other. Weakened geniuses' role.
評分經典。範式與範式間的不可通約性,決定瞭學科自身知識體係的積纍與成型,最後走至僵化而限製瞭學科的發展,這也解釋瞭為什麼好的研究大多都齣自本學科之外,範式更迭並不意味著進步,也沒有明確目標,像進化一樣是物競天擇的過程。科學變革如社會變革一樣不可能在體製框架內部完成,也不是積纍的而是突變的,作者反對波普爾的“科學是擁有可證僞性”,認為任何範式都不可能在所有條件下成立,而評價範式的標準不是看它在絕對意義上多大程度接近真實(這並非科學目標)而是在相對意義上若乾競爭的範式裏擇取最能吻閤真實並解決問題的範式。是verification-falsification雙重過程。不是範式決定視角,而是已有經驗與視角形塑範式,進而形塑問題本身和得齣的結論。不同範式引齣的問題是不同的,對同一概念的使用其實內涵外延不同
評分課程指定讀物。個人覺得很好,好讀易懂條理清晰。
評分開始的步步堅定到最後一章全麵圍攻,關於科學神秘客觀又直綫進步的神秘麵紗被整個扯下,隻留著一個“不知道目標的進化過程”稍可安慰。不可通約性需要小心界定,以及要讀讀polanyi看看兩個人說的有多像瞭。
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions 2025 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載