Elizabeth Perry is Henry Rosovsky Professor of Government at Harvard University and Director of the Harvard-Yenching Institute. She is the author of many books, most recently: Mao's Invisible Hand: The Political Foundations of Adaptive Governance in China and Patrolling the Revolution: Worker Militias, Citizenship and the Modern Chinese State.
How do we explain the surprising trajectory of the Chinese Communist revolution? Why has it taken such a different route from its Russian prototype? An answer, Elizabeth Perry suggests, lies in the Chinese Communists' creative development and deployment of cultural resources - during their revolutionary rise to power and afterwards. Skillful "cultural positioning" and "cultural patronage," on the part of Mao Zedong, his comrades and successors, helped to construct a polity in which a once alien Communist system came to be accepted as familiarly "Chinese." Perry traces this process through a case study of the Anyuan coal mine, a place where Mao and other early leaders of the Chinese Communist Party mobilized an influential labor movement at the beginning of their revolution, and whose history later became a touchstone of "political correctness" in the People's Republic of China. Once known as "China's Little Moscow," Anyuan came over time to symbolize a distinctively Chinese revolutionary tradition. Yet the meanings of that tradition remain highly contested, as contemporary Chinese debate their revolutionary past in search of a new political future.
發表於2025-01-22
Anyuan 2025 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
這是一本典型的問題主導的研究。裴老師的問題就是“為什麼中共當年能夠扇乎那麼多人死心塌地的鬧革命。” 先生從文化入手,基本論斷是culture/ideology localization。 但是無意之中,還有另一層恐怕也更加重要。李立三能把工人俱樂部搞起來,劉少奇能接著把它變成小莫斯科,核...
評分這是一本典型的問題主導的研究。裴老師的問題就是“為什麼中共當年能夠扇乎那麼多人死心塌地的鬧革命。” 先生從文化入手,基本論斷是culture/ideology localization。 但是無意之中,還有另一層恐怕也更加重要。李立三能把工人俱樂部搞起來,劉少奇能接著把它變成小莫斯科,核...
評分- 初碰到這本書時, 差不多被它的封麵與設計差嚇跑瞭。港大齣版社的書, 講真應該做好一點設計. 牛津比它好很多, 中大近年也不錯. - 迴到這本書的話, 我覺得非常好看. 由於對國內學術圈不熟悉, 在找關於近代中國史的書本時我總是不大敢找內地齣版的書籍, 不知道哪些題目內地是可...
評分這是一本典型的問題主導的研究。裴老師的問題就是“為什麼中共當年能夠扇乎那麼多人死心塌地的鬧革命。” 先生從文化入手,基本論斷是culture/ideology localization。 但是無意之中,還有另一層恐怕也更加重要。李立三能把工人俱樂部搞起來,劉少奇能接著把它變成小莫斯科,核...
評分題目的意思是指李立三最初利用當地習俗傳播革命的觀念,到八十多年後,革命成瞭當地的文化傳統。不深究,可自行體會。 談讀書的大緻感受。 有許多不瞭解的新知識。李立三與安源是我之前從未聽說過的。可能也從側麵說明,經濟化的大趨勢導緻憑藉政治性而聞名的安源某種程度上已...
圖書標籤: 海外中國研究 裴宜理 中國革命 社會運動 毛澤東 曆史 政治學 安源
Perry的路子還是喜歡的
評分裴宜理似乎對當年中共革命的理想主義色彩抱有一種曖昧的同情,以至於在還原曆史場景的時候,她死活無法把“活該”兩個字對安源的礦工說齣口,但鐵一般的事實證明安源工人就是典型的“天作孽猶可違、自作孽不可活”。不過,隻要裴宜理不戳破他們被共産黨欺騙瞭這一點,裴宜理對中共動員群眾的力量手段與內部權力鬥爭就可以有一個更加踏實的立腳點,不至於在自欺與欺人之間把“活該”與“革命”畫上曆史清算的等號。實在明智。
評分Perry的路子還是喜歡的
評分revolution
評分一本自己翻譯瞭近1/3的書,看起來舒服而不費力。
Anyuan 2025 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載