Elizabeth Perry is Henry Rosovsky Professor of Government at Harvard University and Director of the Harvard-Yenching Institute. She is the author of many books, most recently: Mao's Invisible Hand: The Political Foundations of Adaptive Governance in China and Patrolling the Revolution: Worker Militias, Citizenship and the Modern Chinese State.
How do we explain the surprising trajectory of the Chinese Communist revolution? Why has it taken such a different route from its Russian prototype? An answer, Elizabeth Perry suggests, lies in the Chinese Communists' creative development and deployment of cultural resources - during their revolutionary rise to power and afterwards. Skillful "cultural positioning" and "cultural patronage," on the part of Mao Zedong, his comrades and successors, helped to construct a polity in which a once alien Communist system came to be accepted as familiarly "Chinese." Perry traces this process through a case study of the Anyuan coal mine, a place where Mao and other early leaders of the Chinese Communist Party mobilized an influential labor movement at the beginning of their revolution, and whose history later became a touchstone of "political correctness" in the People's Republic of China. Once known as "China's Little Moscow," Anyuan came over time to symbolize a distinctively Chinese revolutionary tradition. Yet the meanings of that tradition remain highly contested, as contemporary Chinese debate their revolutionary past in search of a new political future.
發表於2024-05-14
Anyuan 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
題目的意思是指李立三最初利用當地習俗傳播革命的觀念,到八十多年後,革命成瞭當地的文化傳統。不深究,可自行體會。 談讀書的大緻感受。 有許多不瞭解的新知識。李立三與安源是我之前從未聽說過的。可能也從側麵說明,經濟化的大趨勢導緻憑藉政治性而聞名的安源某種程度上已...
評分題目的意思是指李立三最初利用當地習俗傳播革命的觀念,到八十多年後,革命成瞭當地的文化傳統。不深究,可自行體會。 談讀書的大緻感受。 有許多不瞭解的新知識。李立三與安源是我之前從未聽說過的。可能也從側麵說明,經濟化的大趨勢導緻憑藉政治性而聞名的安源某種程度上已...
評分這是一本典型的問題主導的研究。裴老師的問題就是“為什麼中共當年能夠扇乎那麼多人死心塌地的鬧革命。” 先生從文化入手,基本論斷是culture/ideology localization。 但是無意之中,還有另一層恐怕也更加重要。李立三能把工人俱樂部搞起來,劉少奇能接著把它變成小莫斯科,核...
評分這是一本典型的問題主導的研究。裴老師的問題就是“為什麼中共當年能夠扇乎那麼多人死心塌地的鬧革命。” 先生從文化入手,基本論斷是culture/ideology localization。 但是無意之中,還有另一層恐怕也更加重要。李立三能把工人俱樂部搞起來,劉少奇能接著把它變成小莫斯科,核...
圖書標籤: 海外中國研究 裴宜理 中國革命 社會運動 毛澤東 曆史 政治學 安源
運用Cultural positioning與Cultural patronage來構建安源煤礦曆史變遷,梳理細緻,兩個概念由於外延太廣,自然都能恰到好處的運用到討論各階段對安源的動員/宣傳/服務政治上麵。但裴宜理對“既有文化資源”的界定,實在過於模糊:既包括瞭作為文化本身的民間秘密會社傳統,又涵蓋瞭作為文化載體的各類錶現形式,但到瞭最後結論部分,又從列文森切入,試圖再理解儒傢與共産主義。具備啓發性,但或許並沒有達到裴所預期的成果。
評分裴宜理教授作品中最喜歡的一部,csc麵試時被問到如何理解ccp在中國的成功,就照這個路子迴答的。
評分用安源透視從革命到改革的各種問題,風格(竟然)頗似史景遷。雖然作者意圖的核心,即CCP的cultural positioning,或宣傳策略與文化傳統的配閤與張力這一點上結論並不十分新穎,但有趣的曆史發掘,無論是李立三與安源地方精英的妥協和博弈,還是建國後宣傳工作中對曆史的重構,仍給人啓發。本書的創作雖齣於作者研究興趣的文化轉嚮,並把大半篇幅用來談論剋裏姆林學的鬥爭,但仍保留瞭前作對工人階級命運的關注。從前者齣發,這是持續不斷你爭我奪的cultural governance;而從後者的角度齣發,這大概是“興百姓苦亡百姓苦”的一個故事。
評分Replete with historical fun facts, but not particularly interests me due to its focus on political leadership itself. Successfully answered the question: why do they worship Mao in contemporary China.
評分講的是中共領導人在革命起始階段如何運用所謂的“傳統”來讓安源工人死心塌地地跟著革命。比如跟青幫頭子聯閤,用三字經教學並注入”人性尊嚴”的論斷,運用宗教儀式,強調領導人的神力以及魅力等等。這種地方化的手段讓中共迅速獲得瞭工人的支持。隻是當革命已經漸入佳境或者完成任務。安源工人便被拋棄瞭。
Anyuan 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載