薩伯(Peter suber,1951- ),影響甚廣的“開放近用運動”(open Access Movement,提倡在科研文獻發錶的同時,將電子文本在網上公布,以便讀者免費取閱)的發起人。1973年畢業於美國葉爾漢姆學院,1978年獲西北大學哲學博士學位。長期擔任葉爾漢姆學院哲學教授,也講授法律、計算機等其他課程。薩伯從事很多領域的社會活動,兼任SPARC(“學者齣版與學術資源聯盟”)高級研究員和耶魯大學法學院信息社會項目訪問學者等多項職務,還是兩傢網站(openaccessnews和ODenaccessletters)的博客作者。1991年齣版專著《自我修正的悖論》。
Lon Fuller?s Case of the Speluncean Exp/ ~rers is the greatest fictitious legal case of all
time. That is saying a lot, for it has some stiff competition. While its competitors
may outdo it in courtroom drama, character development, or investigative
suspense, none matches it in legal depth or dialectical agility It shows not what
makes some lawyer?s caseload interesting, but what makes law itself interesting. It
would not make a good movie; it is all ?talking heads.? In fact, the parts that
would make a good movie - the events within the cave - are over and done with
by the time Fuller begins his piece. Moreover, these events are not depicted with
cinematic vivacity, but described after the fact with judicial precision and bland-
ness.
Fuller?s live Supreme Court justices tranquilly but rigorously show the
complexity of the facts and the flexibility of legal reasoning. The live opinions
focus on different factual details and legal precedents, and lit them into different
background structures of legal and political principle. By these means Fuller
crystallizes important conflicts of principle and illustrates the major schools of
legal philosophy in his day. Fuller?s case has been called ?a classic in jurispru-
dence,? ? a microcosm of this century?s debates,? and a ?breathtaking intellectual
accomplishment.?*
Although only half a century separates us from the date of Fuller?s essay, the
legal landscape has changed profoundly. I have written nine new judicial opin-
ions on his case, with roughly Fuller?s own objectives in view, hoping to explore
important issues of principle and in the process to bring the depiction of legal
philosophy up to date.
While I would like to depict the major schools of legal philosophy today,
giving each its due, there are a few obstacles that subtly constrain the project.
Suber, Peter. Case of the Speluncean Explorers: Nine New Opinions.
Florence, KY, USA: Routledge, 1998. p ix.
http://site.ebrary.com/lib/cityu/Doc?id=2003075&ppg=9
Copyright ? 1998. Routledge. All rights reserved.
Preface
Introduction 1
Pt. I Lon Fuller's Case of the Speluncean Explorers 5
Opinion of Chief Justice Truepenny 7
Opinion of Justice Foster 10
Opinion of Justice Tatting 15
Opinion of Justice Keen 20
Opinion of Justice Handy 25
Opinion of Justice Tatting 31
Postscript 32
Pt. II Nine New Opinions 33
Opinion of Chief Justice Burnham 35
Opinion of Justice Springham 45
Opinion of Justice Tally 57
Opinion of Justice Hellen 64
Opinion of Justice Trumpet 73
Opinion of Justice Goad 79
Opinion of Justice Frank 89
Opinion of Justice Reckon 91
Opinion of Justice Bond 99
Index 108
發表於2024-05-12
洞穴奇案的十四種判決 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
因為最近考慮刑法正當化事由裏的被害人同意 因此很有必有把洞穴奇案細讀一遍 也有瞭些新的想法。 最基本的立場對持無疑是絕對道德主義vs相對道德主義的分野 我的立場是站在功利主義這一方 當然決定這個立場除瞭道德層麵的取嚮 也有實在法層麵上的問題 例如避免飢餓到底算...
評分這幾天看瞭阿加莎的無人生還,雖然是第一次看但是總覺得似曾相識,一查原來是小時候在九十年代看過一部根據此書改編的電視劇叫綠島。情節是有十個人被以各種的理由被邀請到一個無人的小島上度假,第一天晚上就被留聲機裏麵的聲音宣判十個人翻過這樣那樣的罪殺死過人,接下來...
評分 評分美國著名法學傢富勒先生撰寫的《洞穴奇案》已經成為初入法學門徑的讀者首選的讀物之一。這本書通過精妙的安排,使得讀者能夠領略到法律不一樣的另一麵:對於一般人而言,一個行為無非就是閤法與非法兩種簡單的選擇,隻要學會法律條文自然也就懂瞭如何做齣這個看上去很簡單的判...
圖書標籤: 法律 法學 哲學 法理學 道德 法理 洞穴奇案的十四種判決 美國
可能是我對法理學還不熟悉吧,我覺得討論過來討論過去,隻是在文字上的辯解而已。倒是有幾個比較有意思的點:法律的目的,“故意”,可替代的方法,還有對緊急避險的討論。第十的那裏,標題是忍受不正義好過實施不正義,但我覺得我們應該把作為和不作為放在一個平等的位置上。
評分極力推薦
評分刑法21條的緊急避險很實用啊,法不責人所不能,至於該案不公平的問題,民法領域貌似有一條『契約自由』原則,但畢竟有罪與否還是得取決於那些前提假設條件的,當然,道德幷非構成殺人罪名的依據,同理,民衆意嚮亦非無罪的理由
評分刑法21條的緊急避險很實用啊,法不責人所不能,至於該案不公平的問題,民法領域貌似有一條『契約自由』原則,但畢竟有罪與否還是得取決於那些前提假設條件的,當然,道德幷非構成殺人罪名的依據,同理,民衆意嚮亦非無罪的理由
評分法理學/刑法/邏輯訓練之最佳入門or精研讀本推薦!
洞穴奇案的十四種判決 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載