Charles Tilly (May 27, 1929 – April 29, 2008) was an American sociologist, political scientist, and historian who wrote on the relationship between politics and society. He was the Joseph L. Buttenwieser Professor of Social Science at Columbia University.
Tilly's academic work covered multiple topics in the social sciences and influenced scholarship in disciplines outside of sociology, including history and political science. He is considered a major figure in the development of historical sociology, the early use of quantitative methods in historical analysis, the methodology of event cataloguing, the turn towards relational and social-network modes of inquiry, the development of process- and mechanism-based analysis, as well as the study of: contentious politics, social movements, the history of labor, state formation, revolutions, democratization, inequality, and urban sociology.
发表于2025-01-22
Coercion, Capital and European States, A.D.990-1990 2025 pdf epub mobi 电子书
中世纪的各种封建政权,其统治的流动性是很高的,所谓的“本土”概念尚不成熟。今日形成的边界明确的国家本土政治秩序在中世纪难以成立,事实上今日欧洲国家边界内的各个地区,在彼时的利益分歧比今日边界之外的地区还要更大,这些合纵连横是很复杂的。故而不了解中世纪,不可...
评分 评分迄今已浅浅阅读了Tilly的两类著作:社会运动、国家建构。 如果有“历史政治学”这个学科,Tilly应该是当之无愧的大佬,以及如果有“画图强迫症”,或者“分析框架星人”等学者类型,或许他也会榜上有名。 僭越了。。。 但事实确实是:尽管Tilly在开篇试图避免“单因素解释”...
评分迄今已浅浅阅读了Tilly的两类著作:社会运动、国家建构。 如果有“历史政治学”这个学科,Tilly应该是当之无愧的大佬,以及如果有“画图强迫症”,或者“分析框架星人”等学者类型,或许他也会榜上有名。 僭越了。。。 但事实确实是:尽管Tilly在开篇试图避免“单因素解释”...
评分图书标签: 政治学 历史社会学 社会学 查尔斯·蒂利 历史 欧洲 Politics 英文原版
In this pathbreaking work, now available in paperback, Charles Tilly challenges all previous formulations of state development in Europe. Specifically, Tilly charges that most available explanations fail because they do not account for the great variety of kinds of states which were viable at different stages of European history, and because they assume a unilinear path of state development resolving in today's national state.
梯利观点极易被简化,遗憾。欧洲战争和军事演变触发权力向国家的集中。强制和资本在辩证关系中相互促进,使得民间武装逐渐成为国家暴力,租-贡关系逐渐变成财政系统。意外后果是国家将国民同质化,国家-社会关系变得更为直接,社会运动和公民权利兴起。强制-资本的组合与逻辑解释欧洲国家殊途同归
评分Tilly的研究堪称该领域的典范,但相比韦伯和福柯的研究,还是显得单薄。现代国家要比这个金铁主义的图景丰富得多。
评分not so coherent as works of Anderson, Mann, and Moore.
评分Tilly的研究堪称该领域的典范,但相比韦伯和福柯的研究,还是显得单薄。现代国家要比这个金铁主义的图景丰富得多。
评分Tilly这本书现在也是研究早期近代欧洲国家形成的经典之作,尤其是Tilly从资本与强制这两个维度解释欧洲国家的形成是相当具有解释力的。不过Tilly将历史发展进行二分,再通过排列组合解释欧洲国家的特殊性,在某种程度上具有简化历史的倾向,不过理论构建,尤其是1000年的历史又需要简化,这个问题终究在社会科学里不是问题。
Coercion, Capital and European States, A.D.990-1990 2025 pdf epub mobi 电子书