Charles Tilly (May 27, 1929 – April 29, 2008) was an American sociologist, political scientist, and historian who wrote on the relationship between politics and society. He was the Joseph L. Buttenwieser Professor of Social Science at Columbia University.
Tilly's academic work covered multiple topics in the social sciences and influenced scholarship in disciplines outside of sociology, including history and political science. He is considered a major figure in the development of historical sociology, the early use of quantitative methods in historical analysis, the methodology of event cataloguing, the turn towards relational and social-network modes of inquiry, the development of process- and mechanism-based analysis, as well as the study of: contentious politics, social movements, the history of labor, state formation, revolutions, democratization, inequality, and urban sociology.
In this pathbreaking work, now available in paperback, Charles Tilly challenges all previous formulations of state development in Europe. Specifically, Tilly charges that most available explanations fail because they do not account for the great variety of kinds of states which were viable at different stages of European history, and because they assume a unilinear path of state development resolving in today's national state.
發表於2024-12-22
Coercion, Capital and European States, A.D.990-1990 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
社會現象不同於自然現象,因為有瞭人的參與。人可以弄清楚自然界的運行規律,卻很難弄清楚由人所組成的社會的運行規律。而這就給各種社會理論提供瞭無限的發揮空間,於是乎,解釋社會發展的理論就多如牛毛,隻要言之成理,不同人們的常識和邏輯嚴重違背,都會有自己的擁護...
評分評魏洪鍾譯《強製、資本和歐洲國傢(公元990-1992年)》 原載於《中國政法大學學報》,作者授權上載 評魏洪鍾譯《強製、資本和歐洲國傢(公元990-1992年)》 張弛 年近八十的查爾斯•梯利是美國哥倫比亞大學特聘的約瑟夫•L•伯騰威澤(The Joseph. Buttenwieser)社會...
評分帶著對劉仲敬“封建製度積纍創造組織資源,大一統消耗組織資源”這一論斷的懷疑,來看tilly對歐洲國傢建設的解釋。Tilly認為國傢能力建設的過程,就是coercion與capital的集中化,通過沒收公民的武器,解散封建製度中各分封領主的武裝,來壟斷暴力,來達到前者,而稅收製度的建...
評分可能翻譯有一些問題,使得我對這本書的理解有些問題。當然,更重要的還是我對西方曆史的欠賬:從這個方麵來說,這是我的問題,不能太多的尋找客觀原因。因為,正如閱讀卡爾·波蘭尼的《大轉型》一樣,曆史的欠賬使得對這一類書籍的閱讀變成瞭走馬觀花。但是,我還是要強調...
圖書標籤: 政治學 曆史社會學 社會學 查爾斯·蒂利 曆史 歐洲 Politics 英文原版
Tilly的研究堪稱該領域的典範,但相比韋伯和福柯的研究,還是顯得單薄。現代國傢要比這個金鐵主義的圖景豐富得多。
評分戰爭與國傢相互塑造,這在三種類型中是不同的,最後演變成national state。韋伯的國傢定義在早期歐洲是不成立的。對於歐洲研究是有意義的。擴展到歐洲外有局限性(中國),比如強調國傢無法通過財政滿足戰爭需要,國傢間的戰爭競爭(state system)。
評分Tilly的研究堪稱該領域的典範,但相比韋伯和福柯的研究,還是顯得單薄。現代國傢要比這個金鐵主義的圖景豐富得多。
評分coercion-intensive, capital-intensive, capitalized coercion, bargaining and struggling, organization, state structures appeared chiefly as a by-product of rulers' efforts to acquire the means of war.
評分PE Core
Coercion, Capital and European States, A.D.990-1990 2024 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載