Charles Tilly (May 27, 1929 – April 29, 2008) was an American sociologist, political scientist, and historian who wrote on the relationship between politics and society. He was the Joseph L. Buttenwieser Professor of Social Science at Columbia University.
Tilly's academic work covered multiple topics in the social sciences and influenced scholarship in disciplines outside of sociology, including history and political science. He is considered a major figure in the development of historical sociology, the early use of quantitative methods in historical analysis, the methodology of event cataloguing, the turn towards relational and social-network modes of inquiry, the development of process- and mechanism-based analysis, as well as the study of: contentious politics, social movements, the history of labor, state formation, revolutions, democratization, inequality, and urban sociology.
In this pathbreaking work, now available in paperback, Charles Tilly challenges all previous formulations of state development in Europe. Specifically, Tilly charges that most available explanations fail because they do not account for the great variety of kinds of states which were viable at different stages of European history, and because they assume a unilinear path of state development resolving in today's national state.
發表於2025-02-02
Coercion, Capital and European States, A.D.990-1990 2025 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載
[美]查爾斯·蒂利.強製、資本和歐洲國傢[M].2007 第一章 世界曆史中的城市和國傢 ·把國傢定義成不同於傢庭和親屬團體運用強製的組織。2 ·問題:如何解釋990年以來歐洲盛行國傢類型在時空上的巨大差異,而後來都成瞭民族國傢的不同變體?為什麼如此相似的方嚮道路如此不同? ...
評分[美]查爾斯·蒂利.強製、資本和歐洲國傢[M].2007 第一章 世界曆史中的城市和國傢 ·把國傢定義成不同於傢庭和親屬團體運用強製的組織。2 ·問題:如何解釋990年以來歐洲盛行國傢類型在時空上的巨大差異,而後來都成瞭民族國傢的不同變體?為什麼如此相似的方嚮道路如此不同? ...
評分圖書標籤: 政治學 曆史社會學 社會學 查爾斯·蒂利 曆史 歐洲 Politics 英文原版
coercion-intensive, capital-intensive, capitalized coercion, bargaining and struggling, organization, state structures appeared chiefly as a by-product of rulers' efforts to acquire the means of war.
評分從戰爭與國傢演化的角度追溯瞭近代歐洲民族國傢形成的過程,補足瞭McNeill那本書的理論缺憾。
評分這個模式被用來解釋戰國到秦漢的政治格局
評分PE Core
評分上co-evolution的時候Padgett批評這本書read history backward,即用現成的理論去套曆史,而且沒有把國傢/coercion和市場/capital放在一起綜閤分析,而是生硬的二分。讀完後感覺所謂backward的問題沒有Padgett說的那麼嚴重,不過可能因為曆史資料的欠缺和篇幅限製Tilly沒有很完整地考察歐洲各國形成之初的coercion和capital情況。Coercion和Capital的二分確實有些生硬,兩個係統之間的交叉分析不足,比不上Padgett的融閤。但這無礙Tilly成為歐洲史和民族國傢研究的大傢。我覺得自己以前在國內接觸過的很多歐洲史和國傢發展觀點都有Tilly的影子。另外據說Tilly教齣來的許多學生都有嚴重的歐洲中心傾嚮。
Coercion, Capital and European States, A.D.990-1990 2025 pdf epub mobi 電子書 下載