James Mahoney, Northwestern University, Illinois
James Mahoney is Gordon Fulcher Professor in Decision-Making and Professor of Political Science and Sociology at Northwestern University.
Kathleen Thelen, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Kathleen Thelen is Ford Professor of Political Science at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
发表于2024-11-21
Advances in Comparative-Historical Analysis 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书
图书标签: 比较历史分析 方法论 政治学 比较政治学 比较政治 研究方法 Methodology 社会科学
Against the backdrop of an explosion of interest in new techniques for data collection and theory testing, this volume provides a fresh programmatic statement about comparative-historical analysis. It examines the advances and distinctive contributions that CHA has made to theory generation and the explanation of large-scale outcomes that newer approaches often regard as empirically intractable. An introductory essay locates the sources of CHA's enduring influence in core characteristics that distinguish this approach, such as its attention to process and its commitment to empirically grounded, deep case-based research. Subsequent chapters explore broad research programs inspired by CHA work, new analytic tools for studying temporal processes and institutional dynamics, and recent methodological tools for analyzing sequences and for combining CHA work with other approaches. This volume is essential reading for scholars seeking to learn about the sources of CHA's enduring influence and its contemporary analytical and methodological techniques.
在很长的一段时间里,自己好像层面相当迷CHA领域的研究,后来逐渐失去了兴趣。大概那时候,有可能是数学很糟,日本史又很入迷的样子。听到一些Path Dependence, State Building这样一些很大的名词,自然会觉得很厉害的赶脚。自然,现在也认为这一领域的研究,大概仍旧还有很长很长的成长余地吧。不过,如果说自己真的想在一个技术迅速进步,数据爆发式增长的时代,作为一名社会科学的学生,想要生存下去的话,也许,即便自己不得手,大概必要的数学和统计学或者数据处理的技法仍旧是无可逃避的,自己不得不翻越的障碍。同样,一个人不必认为定性研究是好做的,大多数人,事实上并不掌握这一领域所要求的高度的英文写作力和接近这一领域研究资源和人脉的渠道。嘛,此书还是非常好的,社会科学的学生是要思考大问题的
评分与03年的书相比,这本书显得更为defensive,反映了定性研究方法在米国的弱势地位。这本书在方法上把比较历史分析局限于历史制度主义,议题上搞大杂烩,分析工具也没有多少实质进展。
评分与03年的书相比,这本书显得更为defensive,反映了定性研究方法在米国的弱势地位。这本书在方法上把比较历史分析局限于历史制度主义,议题上搞大杂烩,分析工具也没有多少实质进展。
评分与03年的书相比,这本书显得更为defensive,反映了定性研究方法在米国的弱势地位。这本书在方法上把比较历史分析局限于历史制度主义,议题上搞大杂烩,分析工具也没有多少实质进展。
评分刷了首尾,挺清晰,但还是不懂要怎么搞CHS
Advances in Comparative-Historical Analysis 2024 pdf epub mobi 电子书